User talk:Zppix/2016/December

Please comment on Talk:Lee Harvey Oswald
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lee Harvey Oswald. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Myth of Mental Illness
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Myth of Mental Illness. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter #2
Hello ,


 * Please help reduce the New Page backlog 

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.


 * Getting the tools we need

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
 * Improve the tools: Vote here.
 * Reduce your review load: Vote here

Ready for Review
Hi there! As per your request in IRC, here's my article ready for review. Thanks in advance! Draft:Ronald_Bert_Smith,_Jr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewmutt (talk • contribs) 01:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Scarlett Johansson
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Scarlett Johansson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Denial of speedy deletion of Russell P. Hughes
Hey, I denied the speedy you put on Russell P. Hughes for CSD G12. Looking at the copy violation report, I only see basic terms that match. Nothing really stands out as a blatant violation. There are some similarities, but this being written about the same subject, I think that will tend to happen.  { MordeKyle }  &#9762; 23:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * thanks Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 23:52, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Suparwono
What is the reason you declined the article submission of Suparwono? 180.246.181.135 (talk) 09:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Latarmá River
Thanks for reviewing my work, but please slow down with the templating. You put tags on Latarmá River one minute after I created it (it is a translation from the es-article). If you had stopped to look at my edit history, you'd have seen that I created another article on a Spanish river yesterday and that it looked fine after 30 minutes of work. Or you might have looked at my edit history over the last 9 years and seen that after 113,000+ edits, and 4,200+ new articles, I don't leave articles in poor form. I mention all this as I'm concerned that newer editors might get discouraged if the same thing were to happen a minute after they create an article. Cheers, --Rosiestep (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I tagged as a reminder only, I meant 0 harm. --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 23:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Review of Vsuality Systems
Hi, Thanks for your review of my page on Visuality Systems. For notability of this page, I believe there are sufficient number of sources from diverse perspectives that indicate that the topic is noteworthy. Still I would be glad if you could indicate what is missing, required or where improvements are needed so as to make the page comply with publication guidelines.

Thanks, Amitwikia (talk) 14:52, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * or mind looking at this? Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 16:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * , the article assets (or at least implies) that the firm developed the Server Message Block] protocol. It did not. The protocol was developed at IBM long before the company was founded. Nor is it, as the article implies, the only supplier. Rather, I suspect the company is one of the dozens of  firms that supply software that use the protcol, aa the article itself does go on to say in section 2.  Nor is it the inventor or only supplier of the Samba implementation .  The references are either the companies own press releases piublished on various sites, or mere notices, on totally generic to the program.  DGG ( talk ) 21:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

question
why is this page OK to be on Wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crnogorska_komercijalna_banka) and the one i created isn't? What am i missing here? Naz081 (talk) 05:59, 21 December 2016 (UTC) =

Need specifics -- what is "advertisement-toned"?
Hi Zppix, thank you for weighing in again on the draft article for creation on Credible. After your previous rejection of the piece, you declined to address a request for specifics on how to better achieve neutral point of view in the article. Nevertheless, substantive edits were made to the piece based on Wikipedia guidelines and it was resubmitted in the hopes that another editor would give it a closer reading and provide useful feedback. Your latest rejection, which states that the article "Still appears advertisement-toned," once again leaves anyone wishing to improve the article guessing. It would be helpful if you could at least point out which sections of the article are not written in a neutral point of view. 162.245.21.61 (talk) 01:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:NOTADVERT for more information on how to remove advertisement toned content. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 19:38, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Zppix. I am familiar with that detailed and clear guidance (see our previous discussion). The article has been written to "maintain a neutral point of view," in "an objective and unbiased style" that is "free of puffery." It is supported by multiple independent, third-party sources (The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, NBC Nightly News, CNBC, Inc., Bloomberg News, Fortune, CNN Money, U.S. News and World Report). I am asking you to point out any specific examples of language that you consider to be "advertisement-toned content" in the draft. You are using a subjective term and applying it to the entire article. Your feedback does not seem to be provided in the spirit of helping to improve the article. 162.245.21.61 (talk) 18:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas


Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. --Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Death of JonBenét Ramsey
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Death of JonBenét Ramsey. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

really curious
Hi, you reviewed my submission of WeCare Solar and referred me to the guidelines for nonprofits:

Organizations are usually notable if they meet both of the following standards: The scope of their activities is national or international in scale. The organization has received significant coverage in multiple[2] reliable sources that are independent of the organization.

We work in 30 countries, so clearly meet the first criterion. In the submission, I cited coverage from the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, BBC, Reuters, CNN and the United Nations. I really don't know what more one could do. We are saving the lives of mothers in childbirth in the countries with the worst maternal mortality rates in the world, and doing it with sustainable energy. What could be more global, or more significant?

Any guidance would be appreciated. Thank you. Robinpeggy (talk) 22:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)robinpeggy
 * , could probably help you, but before you start working on making it follow WP:NORG's guidelines i suggest making it sound a lot more less WP:ADVERTy. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 22:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)