User talk:Zppix/2016/May

Please comment on Talk:Bernie Sanders
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bernie Sanders. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:David Irving
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David Irving. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Alex1977-1 (SPI)
Thanks for opening up the SPI for Alex1977-1. They are now currently blocked. 208.54.5.166 (talk) 00:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem you can think my pal  for blocking... If you need anything let me know.. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 00:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

A Quick Favor... (SPI)
Hi again,

I guess IP's can't open SPI's (unless I'm doing it wrong...). It seems as though is a sock account of. Can you check this one out please? Thanks! 208.54.5.166 (talk) 01:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Already did it --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 01:55, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.5.166 (talk) 01:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Please add evidence and stuff to it please... Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 01:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm working on it... 208.54.5.166 (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Just FYI, I just created my new account here: RoMind (talk) (Just so you aren't surprised by seeing a new editor on the SPI case, if need be)... K Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk)

Please comment on Talk:Ted Cruz
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ted Cruz. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

James David Manning
It's important to highlight that Manning's "homophobia" is in fact largely directed at transsexuals, not gays. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.212.75.121 (talk) 14:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy declined
Hey,

I've just declined the speedy you put on DMACK as I believe it does assert a credible claim of significance, supplying tires to WRC. Also, I think a previous version of the article asserts notability too, we should probably look at bringing that back rather than just deleting it.

 &#91; stwalkerster &#124; talk &#93;  18:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * hey we have concesus for the speedy deletion on IRC however.

Please comment on Talk:Trump: The Art of the Deal
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trump: The Art of the Deal. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Copyedit of Fertility factor
Thanks for copy-editing of Fertility factor (demography)! Please let me know, or note at its DYK nomination page, when you think it can proceed in regard to grammar and general writing. Mikael Häggström (talk) 09:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have completed the copy-edit, please mark it as ✅ at WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Vladimir Solovyov (philosopher)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vladimir Solovyov (philosopher). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Deepak Chopra
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Deepak Chopra. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Georgiy Starostin
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Georgiy Starostin. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Calvineehk
Sorry, but while I think you may have a point, I can't block for this user name: it's garbled and there's no edits made yet. If they start editing, report to AIV please, or at the SPI. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Peyton Manning
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peyton Manning. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marisa Lankester
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marisa Lankester. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

U.S. Route 23 in Georgia
I noticed that when you moved my proposed article on U.S. Route 23 in Georgia the draft tag included a warning that the article already exists. In it's present form it's actually a redirect to U.S. Route 23. I hope that this redirect won't be misinterpreted as an excuse to delete the proposed article. I have other articles I've wanted to work on but haven't been able to finish, so hopefully, those will be left alone by your bot until further notice. -User:DanTD (talk) 14:48, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Ill Look into it if the article is a redirect I will leave a note on your draft and/or Put a note on the redirect.... Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:58, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. In the meantime, since you cited it as an AfC submission, do you know of any other people besides me who are seeking the creation of the article? -User:DanTD (talk) 15:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No Edit: I'm willing to help.Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Since I finally added the page, perhaps we should delete this draft for deletion. -User:DanTD (talk) 01:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Hold on --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

A recent comment...
Hey Zppix, how are you doing? Just quick note about something I found while I was looking through new speedy requests - is a bit WP:BITEy, don't you think? Please remember not to scare the newbies off, because they might become useful contributors if we gently guide them rather than snapping at them. :) As a side note, I've seen a few of your requested deletions have been declined recently - might be worth refreshing your memory on WP:CSD if you get chance :D  &#91; stwalkerster &#124; talk &#93;  20:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I didnt mean to come off that way, I'm just fed up with people that come to wikipedia to vandalise or promote... on top of that my life has been a bit stressful. Thanks however Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lindsay Lohan
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lindsay Lohan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jack Ruby
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jack Ruby. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Avoiding dangerous climate change
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Avoiding dangerous climate change. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Peyton Manning
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peyton Manning. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Human sexuality
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Human sexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:History of IBM CKD Controllers
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of IBM CKD Controllers. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Please be careful!
and don't force other editors spend time fixing your "improvements" Johnbod (talk) 04:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Misguided deletion
You deleted a well-researched page for L'Oreal Paris. You also never went back to the talk page in the speedy deletion area to see the article author had left a clear defense of the article. I believe that you have mishandled this process and you do not understand how this company works. L'oreal Paris is comparable to Garnier and Maybelline. It is the exact same level. You would not suggest Wikipedia delete Garnier, would you? So why delete L'Oreal Paris? It is clear as day that L'Oreal Paris is a sub-company just like Garnier: http://www.loreal.com/brand/consumer RLS (talk) 01:56, 28 March 2016 (UTC) I did not delete it im not an admin i just suggested it to be deleted. Please read wp:civility Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Dover Corporation
Hello: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Dover Corporation has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kim Davis (county clerk)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kim Davis (county clerk). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment.
Hi Zppix

Thanks for taking out time and letting me know that article needs cleanup. I'd be glad to do the needful, please let me know if there's something in particular you want me to take care of. Thank you once again. ThisMr (talk) 20:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment.
Hi Zppix

Thank you for taking out time to review the article again.

1. I will further fix the over-sectioning. It did look a little odd to me too but I needed a third party view. Thanks for pointing it out.

2. I am also going to further improvise on the tone to make it more NPOV.

3. The article cites 4 different, reliable publishers, top national newspapers in India:

1. Times of India (www.timesofindia.com) 2. Hindustan Times (www.hindustantimes.com) 3. The Tribune (www.tribuneindia.com) 4. Daily Post (www.dailypost.in)

I will fix point 1 and 2 and resubmit the article for your kind review. If, in the meantime you notice something else, please do let me know. This is my first time posting an article on Wikipedia and I'm thankful to you for all the learning.

Regards ThisMr (talk) 18:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


 * , please me when you submit it for review and ill look into it. Also you need more then newspapers if possible Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


 * , I have made the changes. Please review and share your valuable feedback. Appreciate it in advance. Thank you!

Please comment on Talk:Jennifer Lawrence
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jennifer Lawrence. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Dallas County Voters League
Hi Zppix. Regarding the reason why the article was not accepted seems odd. I want to create a stub or start article, not a polished article. According to Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment a stub is "A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category." The definition for a start is "An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete. It might or might not cite adequate reliable sources. "  Isn't greater adherence to Manual of Style seems over-the-top for a low level article? Mitchumch (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, I treat the MOS as a editing guideline, if you feel like I'm in error you can submit it again and ask another reviewer to review it nicely. However I'm not going to sit and argue about whom is right. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't realize my inquiry was shouting. I was trying to better understand your position.  I will seek a second opinion.  Thanks.  Mitchumch (talk) 19:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Wasn't I linked that just as a point that me "shouting" or implying im in the right is not what I want to do Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Symbol opinion vote.svg Comment: I am wondering why there is a 2 in the article title will await reply before accepting or denying. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Zppix. You left a question (above) re. a page submission for Ashwini Bhat. There should NOT be a "2" after her name. She isn't like Queen Elizabeth II. But now that you've called my attention to it, I find I can't figure out how to remove it. I'm the slowest loris on the internet. Thanks for yr eye. Forthgone (talk) 21:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

07:45:03, 9 April 2016 review of submission by Hkpt10
Hello, You just rejected the second submission for wikipedia page "Geeta Mehta" saying the page already exists but the one your link refers to is GITA MEHTA....thats a different name..note the spelling of the name "Gita" and "Geeta". I had resubmitted the page after correcting for referencing and citations so please take another look if meets wikipedia guidelines. Will re-submit. ThanksHkpt10 (talk) 07:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC) Hkpt10 (talk) 07:45, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Request on 16:12:32, 9 April 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Pierce Canterbury
Hi, Zppix, Thank you for reviewing the draft for the Missouri Country Music Hall of Fame, and too, for your input. Good suggestion, which I have implemented.

Were there any other recommendations I need to consider before requesting another review?

Thank you,Pierce Canterbury (talk) 16:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Pierce Canterbury (talk) 16:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Request on 03:19:42, 11 April 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Katyc2010
Hi! You've just reviewed an article submitted by me and your comment stated that there was no reflist. I had in fact included 10 references but perhaps forgot to put an explicit heading. Can you please help me with this?

Katyc2010 (talk) 03:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Ill add it for you. --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:39, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of living Medal of Honor recipients
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of living Medal of Honor recipients. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Remarks on Niraj Goel
MR goel was kidnapped by Gulraaj singh sidhu and his gangster accomolices and now they are using wikipedia to defame mr Goel. All remarks put by them are defamotary and not true. We are editing to make it correct Clonealgo (talk) 19:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your RfA
Hi Zppix. I have closed your RfA per the snowball clause. Please take some time to familiarize yourself with the RfA advice page, as well as all other Wikipedia policies. You can do almost as much without the tools as you can do with them, and I encourage you to work to the point where you're experienced enough to run for RfA or MEDCOM. Until then, thank you for your contributions, and happy editing! Kharkiv07 ( T ) 19:02, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Jack Baird
Don't try correct his wikipedia when I am right — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.103.184.187 (talk) 10:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Please read Shouting things loudly does not make them true Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Please be careful
On this diff. I might have been a bit too eager to report User:Steve likes it silly with Twinkle, but please be careful to distinguish which user is actually the vandalism-only account. &mdash; Andy W. (talk · contrib) 18:45, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok what does this happen to do with me? --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Seems like you (probably) misclicked or mistyped and reported a long-time, productive editor (that would be Andy) as a vandalism-only-account on AIV, and he's understandably a bit confused and upset about it. Andy has had several impostors recently; maybe you were trying to report one of them? Cheers, ansh 666 23:45, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Probably I cannot keep track of why I report people... I report 15 plus people daily on average Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Laura Branigan
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Laura Branigan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

AIV reports - please be careful
Hi Zppix, many thanks for being so vigilant on reporting IPs to AIV, but please check they've been sufficiently warned before reporting. For example, of the two you've just reported, one hasn't yet received a final warning, and the other hadn't edited since the final warning was received. Thanks! Mike1901 (talk) 14:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Widr didn't have a problem blocking him.Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC) P.S. also ill get u a diff one min

Question
Thank you for your answer about the 'redirect' question. Much appreciated. If I may one more question: How can I add the name "Tomáš Raček" to the section "Slovak Film Actors" and "Slovak Male Actors" which is at the bottom of a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomáš_Raček ? Or, can someone do it for me? But I still would like to now how to do it. Thank you so much in advance! Jan Babocky (talk) 22:48, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Consider joining our help irc & create a new section when posting on talk pages. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 22:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Time Person of the Year. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

00:10:59, 3 May 2016 review of submission by AllieF16
Hi, Zppix: You recently declined my article on WiredRed and said that I must edit my section headings in order that the article be accepted. Would you please explain to me what it is I need to do to the section headings in order that they be accepted? Thank you very much. Allie Farrell.
 * Read Sectioning section of The Manual of StyleⓏⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ted Cruz
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ted Cruz. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I recently submitted an article to Wikipedia, which you declined due to its subject headings. Would you please tell me how to fix them so that I can do so and re-submit? I'm not sure what's wrong with them. Thank you very much. AllieF16 (talk) 13:51, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Allie read the section above Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:56, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Warning templates
Thanks for your message. I do already use the templates. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 13:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I just wanted to remind you no harm done :) Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:04, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem. I'm a little curious as to what prompted you to mention it though? Eagleash (talk) 13:24, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Here is a timeline:
 * 13:55:39 182.178.63.37: vand
 * 13:56:28 Eagleash: RV V

At this point in time the next thing to expect would be to see a uw on the IP talk page from Eagleash. But Zppix "beats" them to it and posts
 * 13:56:43 their own Welcome-ql message using Twinkle, and a few seconds later
 * 13:56:58 Zppix: uw-vandalism1 using Twinkle

Then Zppix goes and warns Eagleash:
 * 13:57:50 Zppix: Uw-warn using Twinkle

Before Eagleash has had the time to warn IP:
 * 13:57:56 Eagleash: uw-vandalism2

Several things go wrong here, Zppix. The only logical assumption is, you were both trying to revert the vandalism in Henry Cavill. It happens all the time that another editor "beats" you to a revert. In such a case, Zppix, you never go and post a warning on the vandals talk page. You leave that to the editor who actually reverted. Got it? It's not whack-a-mole. Furthermore, if you feel the need to post a welcome message, a blant, generic message like your own Welcome-ql is not the obvious choice, Welcome-warning would have been a better choice.

It gets ridiculous when you then go and post a Uw-warn on ' talk page. What were you thinking? Sam Sailor Talk! 14:15, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * no need to bite me. Also please Assume good faith. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

PS. I also resolved this it was a miscommunication... there was no harm done on anyone's part.


 * . It's OK I didn't take it as a 'warning' just a heads up as it were. But, thanks anyway. ;) Eagleash (talk) 14:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Zppix: In a collaborative environment it is important to listen and learn from mistakes. If you keep arguing, if you keep citing BITE and AGF every time someone tries to help you, you will find it harder to become a better editor. Do you recognize what you did wrong here?

You currently have 188 non-automated edits to main space. You could try to sign up at WP:NPP and get guidance, although 500 edits to mainspace is mentioned. Another option is Counter-Vandalism Unit. How does that sound?

What are your interests? Could I help you get started with some old-school gnoming in an area you like? Sam Sailor Talk! 14:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm in CVU Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand, but I don't require it, it was a misunderstanding, no-one was harmed even Eagleash didn't take it as an warning. Closing this discussion, now please drop it. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Copyedit
Hello Zppix, thank you for your copyedit efforts on Landcruisin'; however, you didn't change anything on the prose, which was what I wanted to be improved. Was this intentional? Thank you. pedro home | talk  16:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Prism yes it was intentional however I'm not sure on what you wanted when it comes to changing the prose.
 * I thought a different editor could help improve the flow of the prose and improve the article. pedro home | talk  16:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'll recopy edit if you wish.

More GA review problems
I just took a look at your Talk:Sylvester (singer)/GA1 review. This article has been waiting since January 1 for a review, and you failed it in under ten minutes. More, the reasons you gave did not match the actual GA criteria. Let's take a look at these:
 * 1A: you have not reviewed this. Why not?
 * 1B: Lead is way too long. Needs more sectioning. According to WP:LEAD, part of 1b of the GA criteria, a lead section for an article of over 30,000 prose characters should be three or four paragraphs. (No lead should ever be more than four paragraphs.) So it is the proper number of paragraphs. It should summarize the rest of the article, which it does. So long as the material also appears in the body and doesn't involve quotes or controversial statements, the lead does not need sourcing so long as the body is adequately sourced.
 * 2A: Majority of article doesn't contain sources/in-line citations. Aside from the lead (see 1B for why they aren't necessary there), all of the paragraphs have at least two sources and most of them more (except for one paragraph that has a single source at the end). You'll have to be more specific about which statements need sourcing that doesn't have any.
 * 2B: you failed this; it is up to you to give examples of which sources you deem to be unreliable
 * 3B: this usually refers to the body of the article rather than the lead. Still, if you think the lead includes information that doesn't need duplication from the body, please give examples of what you think should be cut

Articles should rarely be failed right off the bat if they're fixable within a reasonable period of time, usually within seven days. This one certainly seems to be. Yet you failed it immediately, contrary to the guidelines.

Under the circumstances, you should reopen the review (I can adjust the article talk page, or you could revert the change from GA nominee to FailedGA templates), revise it in light of what I've noted above, and give the nominator a chance to work on the issues. If you plan to continue making GA reviews, I strongly urge you to get a mentor to help guide you, and also not to immediately pass or fail any review without getting input from another GA regular; it will be a while before you get up to speed. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Good Article Reassessment of Square Enix
Square Enix, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:53, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Understand completly
Hi Zppix, I understand and that is perfectly understandable. Wikipedia can be an unusual place sometimes. Don't worry. If you are willing to learn, then that is half the battle. I suggest starting with creating content. Find your favorite articles about topics that interest you, find books, magazines, and web articles—the reliable sources—about that topic, then improve those articles, citing and referring to the reliable sources. After awhile, you'll become good at it and learn Policies and guidelines along the way, and will feel more confident reviewing other's work. Let me know if you ever have questions. Best, —Prhartcom ♥ 14:12, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Please take a look at my major contribs section on my userpage

AfC notification: Draft:Flashback Records has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Flashback Records. Thanks! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Louisa de Rothschild
Hello Zppix. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Louisa de Rothschild, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. Sam Sailor Talk! 19:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem, A7 isn't my strongest suit. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Please refrain from any further New Page Patrolling for the time being. Sam Sailor Talk! 19:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Reason? Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Because it takes knowledge of policies and guidelines, something that can be attained through training at WP:NPP. What is your strongest suit? Sam Sailor Talk! 20:06, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Review of Draft:Flashback Records
Draft:Flashback Records was declined with the reason it exists in main space, and the user told to go and expand it. Flashback Records does exist as a title, but it is not an article, it is a disambiguation page. I have reverted the review and removed the template message from the editor's talk page. When the AFC helper script reports the title exists, always make sure to open it and check contents. Sam Sailor Talk! 16:29, 13 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Dear Zppix. Could you please provide a policy based explanation of (a), (b) , and (c) your subsequent move of Flashback Records to Flashback Records (Disambiguation) and the G6 tagging of the former? Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 17:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I moved it so I could get flashback records into the main space the disambig was in the way of a primary topic article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zppix (talk • contribs) 14:28, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know what you did, I was curious as to what policies and guidelines motivated you. The draft is not ready for main space. Please revert yourself. Sam Sailor Talk! 18:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Trying to remain civil here but to be fair it seems as if your WikiStalking me and commenting on everything I do... you're the only person whom has every questioned my AFC reviewing capabilities Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Keeping your two recent WP:SNOW-closed nominations for AfD Articles for deletion/Detlef Seif and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soldier of Fortune II: Double Helix in mind, I think it is obvious that your grasp on WP:N and its WP:SNGs leave something to be desired, and that's not good for working at AfC. But since you have reviewed Draft:Flashback Records and deemed it notable for main space under WP:CORPDEPTH, please start sourcing it. If you need any help, do not hesitate to call upon me. Regards, Sam Sailor Talk! 18:20, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Zppix, I agree fully with Sam Sailor - you may find the flowchart at WP:AFCR helpful (and please read this if you're going to do any more AfC reviews). The article failed on at least one of these points at the time of approval (in the process of fixing now - but it was a blatant copyvio), and should really have been fixed whilst still in draft, or bounced back to get the user requesting the review to make the changes. Mike1901 (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok... I ran copyvio detector and got a .4% match so I ignored it but appartently you got different results... Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:19, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The References section had direct quotes under each link - I didn't use an automated tool here. You need to be versed in Wikipedia policy before running AfC reviews - not just run through a set of automated tools. I know Sam Sailor has offered their help - I'm more than happy to help too if you need any assistance. (though Sam is much more experienced with AfC, so would probably be my first port of call!) Mike1901 (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Rvision 720541277 had a violation possibility of 55%. Mike1901 took care of it. Sam Sailor Talk! 20:29, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * My apologizes Sam, I realize now that I was being quite rude... Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jamal Mammadxanov
I did not create this page myself, and I explained perfectly clearly why I was removing the speedy deletion tag, so it is your action that is against policy, not mine. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:42, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Regardless... unless you state a valid reason weather in the edit summary or talk page you may not remove CSD (speedy deletion) templates.Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but where did you get that from?! Anyone, except the creator, can remove CSD tags for any reason if they disagree with it. Mike1901 (talk) 20:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (after edit conflict) Thank you, Mike, and Zppix, I very clearly did provide a valid reason in my edit summary. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Oops mike you're correct I misinterpreted the policy my fault Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

PS: everyone makes mistakes
 * They do, that's very true - I've certainly made a few! :-) Just be careful, and check before you act if you're unsure on policy. Mike1901 (talk) 20:50, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

I redacted the warning if I misinterpret anymore polcies such as this feel free to hit me with a bag of trouts Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I think that just one trout will be plenty. As you say, everyone makes mistakes - I think I even made one myself once. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:58, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Lol, ok... I'm going to archive this now if all parties are okay with that (before we get to far off topic :D)Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

PS. sinebot is not autosigning me for some reason even though I have the template to autosine me :(
 * It'll be along in a bit I expect - always good practice to manually sign though, 4 tildes doesnt take long to type :-) Mike1901 (talk) 21:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I usually do manually sign but I'm in a bad habit of forgetting too.. mainly on my user talk usually...Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Controversy Keiko Fujimori
Dear Zppix, the articles cited as references in the section were from April 4th. On May 6th the database of Mossack Fonseca was put online https://offshoreleaks.icij.org/ and this proved that Yoshiyama was not a client of Mossack as cited in the old article on April 4th. So, those lines should be removed because from April 4th until May 6th new information was released. Thank you for your attention. Marcopolo20102010 (talk) 23:09, 19 May 2016 (UTC)


 * You didn't cite that however.. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 23:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Dear Zppix, this is the link. Marcopolo20102010 (talk) 22:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

The Nineties Source
Hello Zppix, I just added a source from Variety but I don't know if I added it right. Can you go to the The Eighties page and see if I added the source in the right place? I am new here and don't fully know how to add a link. Thank you and have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.195.202.12 (talk) 23:34, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Fly all ways airlines
Hi zppix, I see you reverted an edit between Barbados and Georgetown with Fly All Ways, if you check the arrival and departure for both airports the airline is part of the list also, so do you have a valid reason why u revert the edit? The airline fly between the three destinations Monday's, Wednesday's and Friday's, you can check out the arrivals/departures for tomorrow before anymore unproven edits Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.80.54.171 (talk) 00:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stanley Milgram
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stanley Milgram. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Random
Somebody added something random to the page & i changed it back. Please stop spamming me. Thank you. Pizzaandchips11 (talk) 17:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Sorry, if I mistakenly reverted you huggle glitched out on me and crashed it may have processed an edit I didn't intend to... Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Emma Watson
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emma Watson. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)