User talk:Zppix/2016/October

17:42:34, 30 September 2016 review of submission by 162.245.21.61
Hi Zppix, I'm confused by your response to my request for specifics User_talk:Zppix/Archive_1 on achieving neutral point of view in the article on Credible.

In pointing you to the Wikipedia entry on neutral point of view I was trying to give you some specific examples of my understanding of how to achieve a neutral point of view, so you could point out any concerns you have with the article. As I mentioned, the article has gone through extensive revisions based on comments by previous reviewers.

I asked for specifics on what issues you think are unresolved. Your reply -- that "Wikipedia can not be used as a reference/source" -- doesn't help me improve the article.

The article itself does not use Wikipedia as a reference or source. I only cited Wikipedia in my request for help from you, as a starting point for discussion.

162.245.21.61 (talk) 17:42, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Page review
Hi, Zppix

Thanks for the barnstar. I should take some of my old ones out of mothballs.

You may be interested to know, that in the old, old days of Wikipedia a user named Maveric (sp?) personally reviewed every single edit to every Wikipedia page - for an extended period - until it finally became too much for him as editing volume began to pick up. --Uncle Ed (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * wow cool --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 17:15, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jules Feiffer
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jules Feiffer. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

User:BeatrixZ/sandbox
That isn't my article. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Huh, possible AFCH error? ? --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:49, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes. Why would I have created an article in someone else's sandbox?  (I am sure that there are reasons, but not honest reasons.)  I just moved an article from the sandbox into draft space, and now something thinks that it is my article.  I don't really care.  In any case, it needs G13-ing.  Robert McClenon (talk) 21:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, don't use the page move function on a submission use a script such as Draftify. --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I always use the page move function on submissions, and only very rarely does it do anything weird. What is Draftify?  Robert McClenon (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Draftify can be found here. --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:AlMaghrib Institute
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:AlMaghrib Institute. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Re: greater toronto multiple alarm association.
Please define "reliable" sources. The artivle was declined despitere ferences from local newspapers, municipal documents and references from the annual report of a fire department. Livelongandprosper2015 (talk) 23:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:RS --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 15:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Adoption request
Hi,

As you can see by my talk page, Swister Twister had accepted alot of my articles. I had talked to him before in IRc and now that he retired, he referred me to you to review my own articles when i submit them. Is this possible?

Pyrusca (talk) 19:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure!! Just let me know! --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 20:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I was looking at the de-stub thing for Africa. The prizes didn't seem worth it..... Its alot of effort and there will be the uber competitive. Pyrusca (talk) 23:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Young_Electrophysiologists
Hi, Zppix. Thank you for your review of "Young_Electrophysiologists" draft. Its was declined second time although the content and referencing were significantly improved to comply with "notability" requirements. References include well-known sources independent of the subject. Would you please kindly tell me what exactly needs to be improved for this article to be published? Is it possible to ask someone more experienced to contribute to the article? Thanks for your help. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armatura (talk • contribs) 20:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Young_Electrophysiologists
Hi, Zppix. Thank you for your review of "Young_Electrophysiologists" draft. Its was declined second time although the content and referencing were significantly improved to comply with "notability" requirements. References include well-known sources independent of the subject. Would you please kindly tell me what exactly needs to be improved for this article to be published? Is it possible to ask someone more experienced to contribute to the article? Thanks for your help. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armatura (talk • contribs) 20:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:James Watson
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James Watson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Review Dr. Adib Farhadi Wiki
Dear Zppix, Please see the resubmitted Wiki for Dr. Adib Farhadi based on your comments. I have incorporated substantial referencing based on wiki guidelines from reliable sources. Hoping this meets your standards. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usfstudentacct (talk • contribs) 16:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

16:34:44, 21 October 2016 review of submission by Usfstudentacct
Dear Zppix Please see the resubmitted Wiki for Dr. Adib Farhadi based on your comments. I have incorporated substantial referencing based on wiki guidelines from reliable sources. Hoping this meets your standards. Thank you

Please comment on Talk:Dinesh D'Souza
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dinesh D'Souza. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dinesh D'Souza
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dinesh D'Souza. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)