User talk:Zrlram

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Ronz 22:13, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

License tagging for Image:AfterGlow Example.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:AfterGlow Example.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 22:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

re:Raffael Marty
A tag has been placed on Raffael Marty, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Ronz 22:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Afterglow (Data Visualization tool), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Ronz 22:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Afterglow was deleted per above reasons, namely "advert - non-notable, sole editor appears to be developer of AfterGlow, no references given". Please see WP:AUTO and WP:V. Tyrenius 01:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Diving into Wikipedia
Hi Zrlram. I read your comments on my talk page, and looked through your other edits. As I said on my talk page, the biggest problem is that you're writing articles about yourself and your program. As Tyrenius mentions above, you should read WP:AUTO (a guideline against writing autobiographies) and WP:V (official policy stating "Articles should contain only material that has been published by reliable sources."). You might also want to read Conflict of interest which discusses possible conflicts of interest when contributing to Wikipedia.

Also, the link you added to Security Information Management System is inappropriate in part because it is to the main page of a commercial site. I've removed the link. You may want to read through WP:EL and WP:SPAM which are the relevant guidelines concerning such links.

It's a lot to read, but I hope you will. I'll be happy to answer further questions, or find someone who can answer them for you. --Ronz 03:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


 * If you have knowledge of the computer world, I suggest you make useful contributions to other articles to get the hang of things. You can prepare an article on yourself, if you wish, in a sub page with proper verification, preferably with notes and references as in WP:CITE, then get feedback from neutral editor(s), as to whether they will post it. To start subpage called Draft, click User:Zrlram/Draft. Tyrenius 03:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  MrOllie (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)