User talk:Zsinj/Archive 3

Thanks for your support
r ƒa · ɐƒɹ Thank you for supporting me in my request for adminship! It ended with a tally of 39/5/4, and I am now an admin. I'm glad to have earned the trust of the community, and I will make use of it responsibly. Of course, you can let me know of any comments or concerns you have.

With a million articles in front of me, I'd better get mopping.

 r speer  / ɹəəds ɹ  05:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC) 

rvv
Thanks for fixing the Pearl Harbor page (Next time I'll be more careful picking a version to rv to). Ewlyahoocom 17:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Globalization
You cannot revert what I have done. It is extremely balanced. I have made it more readable and I have put everyone point of view in this article. This is not vandalisim. Firmitas 17:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I encourage you to use edit summaries and the Show Preview button. These actiosn will keep Recent Changes free of your multiple, consecutive edits. Thanks. --ZsinjTalk 17:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Roman salute
Roman salute: what looked like vandalism was in fact reversal of another anon's rant with personal attack (right in the article, against wikipedian's accounts) and false edit comments. mikka (t) 21:01, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Fark.com Article
Related pages to this dispute: User talk:Haizum, User talk:tarrant84, Talk:Fark.com --ZsinjTalk

User Tarrant84 is really getting worked up about your reverts. I've been getting angry emails where he threatens to have my IP banned by an admin for one reason or another, which is funny because I haven't actually made any changes to the main article. I can forward you the email I received if you like. Haizum 16:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm a little confused. All I did was express my POV on the discussion page for the sake of consensus; I never actually edited the main article. I'm wondering why Tarrant84 is challenging me directly on this issue when I have made no attempt to stop his edits other than express my disapproval on the talk page. Perhaps he has me confused with another editor? Haizum 17:26, 4 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Yikes. I thought I was allowed to delete my own comments, just not another user's. Sorry about that. Haizum 17:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * It's fine, I just like to preserve the pages as a whole, regardless of content. --ZsinjTalk 17:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I suppose my account of what the Fark experience is like should be partially accepted as valid simply by virtue of the fact that it jives with what the original editor contributed, so well in fact that I was confused as that editor! It would be helpful to get more current and former Fark users to contribute to the discussion so we can remove some of the statements that even I can't support (such as Fark being anti-Jewish). I do believe that much of the timeout and abusive moderator information can be confirmed by other editors. Perhaps Fark will address this in an updated FAQ; we'll have to wait and see. Haizum 18:18, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Polyphasic sleep
Please see WP:NOT. Those dozens of blog links simply do not belong. In general, blog links do not belong on Wikipedia. They fail to meet WP:V. -- 22:43, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * My mistake. Thanks for being on my toes. :-) --ZsinjTalk 22:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
P.S. If you are interested in The Beatles, User:Lar has asked me to tag on a little note advertising the creation of a new Beatles WikiProject that we are currently setting up. Please sign up and help.

RfA/Christopherlin
Thanks for your vote on my RfA. It closed without consensus (22/11/8), but I understand the concerns raised. After I have more experience, I'll likely be up again someday, at which time I hope to have your support. --Christopherlin 17:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Your RfA
I think you'll make a great administrator, given a bit more time. In the highly unlikely event that no one nominates you in three months, please drop me a line. RfA's (IMHO) look better when someone nominates you. Ifnord 18:32, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Bad luck (and this is long overdue), I'd have loved to see you succeed. I'm surprised there was lack of consensus. I guess you'll just have to take your opposition's words on board and keep on plugging away... See you around! <font face="Verdana" color="#FF0000">haz  (user talk)<font color="#00FF00">e 10:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Vary RfA
Hi,

Just to let you know, you appear to have voted twice at this RfA, so I have stricken your second vote for you. It's no problem; I usually forget and do it about once a month myself. :) Do be careful, though!  Best wishes, Xoloz 00:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging: NLD
Thanks for notifying this tag. Actually I did not know about this tag. I was searching but did not find on untagged images page. I think it should be there. Thank you, --08:04, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you once again. I have tagged . Should it be more specified with windows because it is not so clear which operating system is used?  Shyam  ( T / C ) 15:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I am in doubt to tag Image:Class 171-cab.jpg. I have tagged it twice but uploader didn't satisfy with any of the tags. Please suggest me which tag should be used? Shyam  ( T / C ) 16:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * But conditions tel that it can be used for commercial use with the permission of author/creator. I think the suggested tag is not suitable for it. Suggest me further. Shyam  ( T / C ) 16:34, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks Shyam  ( T / C ) 16:45, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Kudos again
Please keep up the good work! We've enjoyed your contributions to the community. -- Samir ∙ <font face="Arial Narrow" color="#000000"> T C 00:46, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * You deserve it! You've done a great job so far.  Cheers -- Samir ∙ [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px|  ]]<font face="Arial Narrow" color="#000000"> T C 01:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user talk page. There are some very grumpy wikipedians out there. &mdash; ApolloCreed (comment) (talk) 19:12, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Ditto. Same grump. :)  Kuru   talk  01:04, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

How can we put forward a reply to you
You sent me a message saying offensively that i had vandalised the encylopedia. I have not done that. I have not put any racist, bullying, wife beating views. Why are you so offensive. And every time i try and reply to you you threaten me again. You sent me a message with no explanation to what you were referring to, ut simply informing me to not vandlaise the encylopedia and then not to put "nonsese" on the encylcopedia. Why can't you see how offensive and bullying that is. I didn't even know you could send messages and then suddenley from out of the blue you send me a threat, with no explanation. You are a bully. I cannot see how i vandalised the thing in any way. But then you send me an e-mail with no explanation, and no chance of reply. I have not done any vandalism yet i am not able to reply to you. You should not be in admin if you take liberites to send people such an abusive and hurtful message without explanation. Will you ban me for answering back. Are you a bully. I should not be banned simply for trying to communicate with you in reply to an ofensive attention seeking message. I have other computers so don't think you can just destroy me. Are you like the type of people who join the police or become security guards just so they can bully people and pretend they have the law on their side. This message is written by Lonympics. This is not vandalism this is the only way i have of replying to you. Who do you think you are. I predict you had a political dissagreement and decided to missuse your power to tell me i had done something wrong. I know bullies often try to become message board moderators so they can bully people on the internet, did you only become an admin on this website so you could bully people you dissagree with. Don't think you can stop me just by bullying me. You seem eager to let people edit you site in a complimentrary ways but not to point out you have been a bully. This is not vandalising your page this is answering back to your bullying. It is not my fault if if other bullies will back your side straight away. I bet admins of wilpedia will back eachiother up like the police do. Tell me which article i had vandalised before you sent me the message. Tell me that. And don't be so offensive. Will i get banned without reply. If i do that just proves my pointa bout you. You were deeply offensive to me and yet expect me to act like three year old being told off, and not answer back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lonympics (talk • contribs)


 * My Reply: User talk:Lonympics. --<b style="color:#22AA00;">Zsinj</b><sup style="color:#888888;">Talk 20:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Contributions of 2nd party before registration:

warnings
I see you're pretty good at finding vandals for me to block, even if they're really obvious, please don't start at the test4 warning, try giving them a test3 before the last warning, warning templates actually work most of the time :). You could also insert template:bv in some cases... -- O bli (Talk) ? 17:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Please Help Us Clean WP from Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath and His Crony
Hamsacharya Dan is back with his usual vandalism. Adityanath, the sysop on watch, is going on a holiday. Please see my Talk Page, Mahavatar Babaji Talk Page, and Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath Talk page to understand the situation that led me to you. We need your help and other sysops whom you might know.

Thank you so much.

No To Frauds 23:31, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Thanks for your particularly encouraging support in my RfA. It passed, with a final tally of 62/0/1. I'm touched by all the kind comments it attracted, and hope I'll be of some use with the new tools. You know where I am if you need to shout at me. Flowerparty ? 15:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Thanks for supporting my RFA. I really appreciated the show of support and all the kind words from so many great Wikipedians. I hope I live up to them! -- Vary | Talk 17:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Nacon kantari  e |t||c|m 23:18, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Thank you for your recent vote on my RFA. While the nomination failed, I was rather expecting it due to the big lapse between registration and recent edits. Anywho, if you have any suggestions as to how I could improve so as to hopefully succeed next time, please let me know! Thanks! &mdash;akghetto talk 07:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Fark.com reversion war
Hi Zsinj! I apologize for the delayed response. I am quite happy with the comprimise we have come to with the Fark.com page. From the beginning, I didn't feel Wiki was the appropriate source to post Fark criticisms, mainly because they are unverifiable. However, everytime we remove it someone uses the Wiki page to voice their personal opinions about the website. Again, your input and perspective is greatly appreciated.tarrant84 22:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)tarrant84

Cannabis edits
Sorry, didn't mean to overwrite your reverts. I didn't have objections to some of that anon user's contributions except for the one statement about an IQ study that was not sourced. Is the current edit OK with you?  OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:18, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me. --<b style="color:#22AA00;">Zsinj</b><sup style="color:#888888;">Talk 03:18, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Thank you for supporting my RFA. I appreciated the show of support and all the kind words. If there's ever anything I can do to help with my new administrator status, please don't hesitate to contact me. --Myles Long 14:25, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

rvv
Hello, whenever I change a page, like fix grammar or spelling or anything, you revert it back and then you warn me "DO NOT DO BLANK EDITS", even though I changed something, it might be hard to see, but look harder next time. =) kudos —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.161.200 (talk • contribs)

thanks for th headz up on [[image:lady falling.gif]]
can't believe it took u guys this long. you'r very thorough w/ all your various CP statuses. 'preciate it. I just put it up for fun once- I'm over it now. thankz. Cool Your Head Down. OscarMeyerPeener. 05:55, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Speedy Delete tags
When you tag an article for deletion, even speedy deletion, as you did with Rising Dissent, please make a corresponding entry on WP:AfD. To do so, all you need to do is click the redlink created by the delete tag (I believe it says something like "you can vote on this here", with the "here" in red. When there is no corresponding entry on AfD, it is very easy for people to remove the tag (which they are not supposed to do before the issue is settled), which is precisely what the author of said article did. I don't know if you care enough to go back and retag it, but I thought I'd at least give you a heads-up for nextime.--Rockero 18:50, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I guess they only need an entry if the speedy deletion is contested--my bad.--Rockero 19:50, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks!
Hi Zsinj! Thank you for supporting my RfA. It passed at 105/1/0, putting me in WP:100 - I'm delighted and surprised! I'm always happy to help out, so if you need anything, please drop me a line. Cheers! ➨ ❝ R E  DVERS ❞ 20:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

(Some) copyedit
Hello. As a member of the Cleanup team, could you please check the article Silvia Corzo? I've translated the info at the Spanish-language article, but my English is not so good. Thank you in advance. --Julián Ortega - drop me a message 21:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! ¡Muchas gracias! --Julián Ortega - drop me a message 19:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Name????
Thanks, I agree that slip ups happen sometimes, and I accept your apology. I, however, did not call you any name whatsoever. I am sorry if you thought I called you any name, but I did not. If you thought the title of my comment (Pig) was a name, it was the title of the article being modified. Please do more research in the future before accusing. Thank you! :) {{Subst:unsigned|Cardsplayer4life}


 * Haha, funny stuff. Again, sorry about the misunderstanding. ;-) (Cardsplayer4life 04:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC))

Please stop tagging these images for speedy deletion
There is a backlog at Category:Images with unknown source, that is well know. Forcing the issue by tagging them all for speedy deletion is not helpful. ×Meegs 16:35, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I replied here. ×Meegs 16:46, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * And again. Thanks for that shortcut, I'll use it more than you know. ×Meegs 16:58, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * By the way, if you've got any throughts on Template talk:No license, please. I suppose I should suggest the same change to the unknown source template. ×Meegs 17:11, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

about Image:San Martin arrives Buenos Aires.jpg
Hi Zsinj, I've uploaded that image from a website. I'll try to contact them to get that kind of info. I uploaded the image when I wasn't that savvy on copyright matters. Afterwards I've restrained myself to pictures I've taken myself and uploaded them at commons. I'll try to find out what kind of copyright this particular image has and put it on speedy deletion myself if I can't reach some kind of agreement with the website, or I'm unable to contact them at all. SpiceMan (会話) 17:37, 25 March 2006 (UTC)