User talk:Zsinj/Archive 8

Renwigg
While I think it's somewhat odd that a new user is making reversions, I don't know if blocking him/her helps. He/she was making good changes. His two reverts (not the four constituting a 3RR violation) were restoring the headings that have been stable for three years. Dposse, however, was the one restoring the POV section headings inserted in the past day during heavy traffic of the article and instigated the revert war with his/her edit summary. 172 | Talk 05:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Block of
Clerk note &bull; In addition to the well-placed username block you gave the user, I would like to inform you that a recent Request for CheckUser revealed this to one of many sockpuppets made by sockpuppeteer. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge  (  Talk to Me  &bull;  Neutrality Project  ) 17:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Facebook
I'm Andrew Phillips, I just requested a join. -- Tawker 08:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Your block of 78-420247rl
78-420247rl, who you blocked, has made an   request on his talk page. Please respond to it.Eli Falk 12:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:DEFCON
Defcon Zero? Huh?

Is Zero... worse than one? Or better than one? (Or is Zero even a real number?) If you're going to use it again, maybe for the colour you should light up all the little boxes instead of blank? I dunno. User:Logical2uTalk 01:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

promised land
I have provided the relevant discussion at the talk page for the promised land article. Until the matter is resolved please refrain from posting the deceptive page which I have deleted. If you have any dispute with the information that I have provided then kindly let me know, don't just re-post the false information or else I will apply to this resource to have you banned and ejected if you are involved in it. This is not to be abused by you as a vehicle for deception and mischief. Your behaviour is frankly attrocious. User:RikridgewayTalk 17 January 2007


 * The article needs to be taken down until the dispute is resolved, as presently it is a massive and damaging deception. I am happy to work through its resolution but it must come down in the meantime.  If you re-post the deceptive article then I will report you to the authorities in the next instance without reverting to you any further and if this resource supports your abusive conduct then I will insist on it being sanctioned by the relevant media authority in its jurisdiction.  I'd suggest you tread carefully.  User:RikridgewayTalk 17 January 2007


 * You will regret that edit you just made. I intend to take this matter to the highest levels of authority for action.  If you think that you are benefitting by posting deception while a dispute is to be resolved then you're grossly mistaken.  They are actions like yours that are mobilising the vast majority of citizens of the world who are tired of these abuses, towards the imminent complete genocide of the jews though you seem to be blind to it.  Open your eyes.  User:RikridgewayTalk 17 January 2007

user caught in autoblock
Please see User_talk:Ajo_Mama for a user that got caught in your autoblock. I don't see any vandalism from this account but have zero experience with unblocking, so didn't want to screw up your username patrol. -- nae'blis 04:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Review of unautoblock request for User:Ajo_Mama
Concerning this autoblock removal request, I looked over the requesting user account and made the unblock of the autoblock. I also left a "final warning" stating that if another such user account is created, the block will stand (maybe next time it should be AO) as it has been over a month and a half since the last block. I just felt like letting you know since you handled the request first. ZsinjTalk 14:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Take a look at Ajo Mama's block log and contribs as well as questions on his own talk pages asking about how to insert server-side code into articles. In my honest opinion, Ajo isn't here to contribute to the encyclopedia -- he's just here to cause grief. See also and  where he admits to being a vandal. Ajo is a serial pest and I encourage you to reblock him. We shouldn't tolerate him anymore. --   Netsnipe  ►  18:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 22nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:56, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Look into this page
Take a look at this page: List_of_drowning_victims. Something about it cries: sucks. --Chibiduo 14:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)