User talk:Zta

Stafford
Stafford hasn't been drafted yet and he's only agreed to terms on the contract, not actually signed it. Be patient.► Chris Nelson Holla! 04:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:YkaTW4821257-01.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:YkaTW4821257-01.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Bergeron
Where did you see that the Falcons released him? And when updating the roster templates can you update the date and count if needed. And instead of saying "Haynes signed, Bergeron released" in your edit summary can you use something like "RB Verron Haynes signed, WR Troy Bergeron released". Thanks.-- Giants27 T/  C  21:13, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks.-- Giants27 T/  C  21:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. mhking (talk) 02:48, 16 May 2009 (UTC)


 * When he becomes notable, then an article would be warranted. But at this point, he would be classified as a non-notable individual. --mhking (talk) 03:13, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Queretaro.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Queretaro.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 23:46, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Linking and copyrights
When adding links to material on an external site, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here 05:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The second external link you added about McNair back in the day is owned by NFL.com and not Baltimore Ravens so you can't link to Baltimore Ravens site for it. If you can find it on NFL.com or any other NFL owned site, you can link to it. Thanks. - ALLST✰R ▼ echo wuz here 05:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Selvish Capers
An editor has nominated Selvish Capers, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Giants27 ( c  |  s ) 15:07, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Darian Stewart
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Airplaneman talk 20:32, 23 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm really sorry. I tagged the wrong page. Sorry. Regards, Airplaneman  talk 20:34, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Victor Marté
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Victor Marté. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Tyler Lorenzen
I have nominated Tyler Lorenzen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Tyler Lorenzen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Giants27 ( c  |  s ) 21:59, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Bradon Godfrey
I have nominated Bradon Godfrey, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Bradon Godfrey. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Giants27 ( c  |  s ) 22:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I undid your closure of the AfD because contrary to what you said I didn't withdraw the nom (as of now) and plus you're closure had a taste of WP:COI as you're the article creator.-- Giants 27 ( c  |  s ) 22:47, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Michael Moore (wide receiver)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Michael Moore (wide receiver). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Michael Moore (wide receiver). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jeff Wolfert
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jeff Wolfert. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Jeff Wolfert. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

PROD tags
Stop adding this to pages that clearly are notable. Do a little research. Dont be bitter because most of the pages you created were deleted.--Yankees10 01:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Related to that:
 * if you place a PROD tag on a page, please use the wikicode  instead of copy&pasting an expanded prod template from another article, otherwise the date timestamp will be incorrect
 * if a PROD is contested, the next step would be a deletion discussion. It's no longer eligible for a proposed deletion if it was contested once.
 * Thank you, Amalthea  17:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Khalil Jones
A tag has been placed on Khalil Jones, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Giants 27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 22:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Khalil Jones
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Khalil Jones. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Khalil Jones (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Zta! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Víctor Marté -

Articles for deletion nomination of Britton Colquitt
I have nominated Britton Colquitt, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Britton Colquitt. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. PackerMania (talk) 21:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Colin Peek
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Colin Peek. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Colin Peek. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File:User-zta.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:User-zta.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Celtic F.C. task force
Hello, you have a userbox which suggests you are a fan of Celtic F.C. I am hoping to start up a task force for Celtic at WikiProject Football. If you are interested please reply here. Thanks. Adam4267 (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Category:California Redwoods players
Category:California Redwoods players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 08:37, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ryan Wing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Wing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ryan Wing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 23:33, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Doug Dutch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doug Dutch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Doug Dutch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cbl62 (talk) 19:27, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Ladi Ajiboye for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ladi Ajiboye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ladi Ajiboye until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cbl62 (talk) 05:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Falcons Pro Football Hall of Famers
Template:Falcons Pro Football Hall of Famers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. RoyalsLife 18:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)