User talk:Zubenzenubi

Personal Analysis
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Paul Cyr 15:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Three Revert Rule
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Paul Cyr 22:19, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
Ok, now that you've had 3 established users reverting your edits and you refusing to discuss the issue, it is now becoming vandalism. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Paul Cyr 14:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Paul Cyr 02:39, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Personal Attacks
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Paul Cyr 00:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Disruption
Given that every one of your Windows related edits have been against consensus, I stongly suggest you discuss your changes on the talk page first before you find yourself in an WP:RFC or worse. (Oh and BTW, thanks for referring to things you do not understand once again. That statement was not an oxymoron. Here's the link.) Paul Cyr 04:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppetry - You and Octanis
I suspect you are Octanis, so I will be lodging a checkuser request on you both shortly. The innocent have nothing to fear! Snappy (talk) 07:54, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * User Snappy makes sweeping allegations and accusations in contravention of civilised editing.

Where has Zubenzenubi contributed inaccurate information or unsubstantiated edits?. Wikipedia is not the preserve of a few, but open to all with accurate information to relay even if it collides with the viewpoint of others.

The checkuser policy states ; ''The tool should not be used for political control; to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. ''

Please justify your assertions in the above context. Zubenzenubi (talk) 02:22, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * When you were looking at the Checkuser policy, did you read this: Grounds for checking - The tool is to be used to fight vandalism, to check for sockpuppet activity, to limit disruption or potential disruption of any Wikimedia project, and to investigate legitimate concerns of bad faith editing. (my bolding)
 * Zubenzenubi's edits total less than 100 in a 2 year period. The 1st edit Zubenzenubi makes to Brian Cowen is to revert the very same edit that Octanis was pushing. That is certainly suspicious. Since Zubenzenubi is a known sockpuppett (using IP addresses), I am concerned that this may be an abuse of wikipedia policy of editing under different usernames. To this end, I will be lodging a check user request in order to allay my concerns. I also fail to see how I am abusing checkuser policy before I even make a request. Unless of course you are trying to bully me into not making the request, because perhaps you have something to hide? If you are innocent then checkuser will prove it. Snappy (talk) 09:04, 14 May 2009 (UTC)