User talk:Zulcaif Ahmad

May 2013
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Costus because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 13:00, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality / purity of zam zam water
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Quality / purity of zam zam water, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.maqfirat.com/2011/10/japanese-scientists-research-on-zam-zam.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 14:02, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Quality / purity of zam zam water
Hello Zulcaif Ahmad,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Quality / purity of zam zam water for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Falkirks (talk) 14:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Don't write about yourself
Consider this your only warning: Please don't promote yourself or your works on Wikipedia.

See What Wikipedia is not, Conflict of interest, and Identifying reliable sources regarding policies and guidelines that you have violated with your edits. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)