User talk:Zulmabm

Speedy deletion of Edificio Panamericano
A tag has been placed on Edificio Panamericano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paragon12321 (talk) 05:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. The article that you edited has notability guidelines for the addition of birthdays and deaths to the list. Refer to WP:DOY for details on what are acceptable entries in Wikicalendar articles. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:12, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Old speedy deletion
Hi Zulmabm, the speedy deletion of Edificio Panamericano seems to be an old issue. Since the article survived then, no "hangon" tag is needed any more at present, so I remove it. Thank you for the reference. Hoverfish Talk 10:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Escuela Brazil
Hi Zulmabm, I understand you are interested in architecture and in Escuela Brazil in particular. However, giving so many external links to picasa albums and blogs is not very acceptable in wikipedia. At best I could help you place some text in the article, which explains the points you are trying to make with the external links and we could try to support it with some references. What do you say? You can answer in Spanish if it is easier for you. Hoverfish Talk 02:04, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Estimado Hoverfish. Las referencias a blog y a albunes picasa es de las pocas maneras que encontré para mostrar material relevante de esta institución que estuvo a punto de desaparecer (no existir). Agradezco si puedes ayudarme en esta situación con algún ejemplo concreto. Zulmabm Talk 03:31, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Gracias por tu colaboración y enseñanza! Zulmabm Talk 14:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

In the same way, we can mention in a paragraph about the 1972 vandalism and place the links to the newspaper articles as references. One thing that would be good is to also mention the year(s) that the annex and the gym were constructed. Also I am not sure if the El Pais newspaper article is currently under copyright. Do you know this? The Diario and La Mañana have been closed, so photocopies of their articles should be Public Domain. I ask because I can upload all these photocopies in a separate category in Commons and we can link to them with a standard link box, like this one below my signature. Thank you too for your help in developing the article. Hoverfish Talk 19:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

I also see something that is not explained well. Did the "Salones Provisorios" become the actual gym, or are they part of the annexed building on the side of the old one? Hoverfish Talk 19:25, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)