User talk:Zuludawn99

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. --IllaZilla (talk) 09:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --IllaZilla (talk) 09:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion of Randy Watson
A tag has been placed on Randy Watson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. 9Nak (talk) 09:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The article is still unverifiable because non of the sources meet the criteria. Good sources are reliable, independent and non-trivial:
 * 1) Walmart, the High Cost of Low Prices Parts 1-11, comments on youtube.
 * This appears to be a copyright violation. That breaks the law, and thus we shouldn't link to it.
 * 1) Personal interview with Randy Watson 12/14/08
 * Other users can't check you did the personal interview or if they did, they can't check what was actually said. Since they have no indication who you are, they can't trust you as an authorative source.
 * 1) The Randy Watson Experience
 * This reference doesn't have enough information for other people to look it up.
 * 1) myspace.com/rwatson62
 * This isn't a reliable source. Anyone can make a myspace page. Fans of Doctor Who were recently warned about fake social network profiles for the main actors of the show. There is no way for the reader to establish that the subject actually created it.- Mgm|(talk) 12:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Note
Please stop inserting personal opinions into articles, like you did at Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem and The Reaping. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 01:02, 1 January 2010 (UTC)