User talk:Zune4ever

Your submission at Articles for creation: Comics Gaming Magazine (August 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Comics Gaming Magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Comics Gaming Magazine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Comics_Gaming_Magazine Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Comics_Gaming_Magazine reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:17, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Comics Gaming Magazine (September 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by IceWelder were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Comics Gaming Magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Comics Gaming Magazine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Comics_Gaming_Magazine Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:IceWelder&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Comics_Gaming_Magazine reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

IceWelder &#91; &#9993; &#93; 09:20, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

About Draft:Comics Gaming Magazine
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Comics Gaming Magazine a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into C&G Magazine. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 23:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, I did not know this was how it was supposed to be done, I am happy to delete everything here, I just noticed I had the complete wrong name of the submission so was trying to correct the mistake. Zune4ever (talk) 23:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * For the future, how to I delete the old page and make a new one to avoid this sort of issue. Thanks so much for the help! Zune4ever (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * For the future, when you move a draft to the mainspace, add the template to the article and the article can be reviewed by another user. If you'd simply like to move an article, you can use the process outlined at WP:MOVE. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 23:54, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help! I will ensure to do that going forward! Still learning here, but want to do my best! Zune4ever (talk) 23:58, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Not a problem! Feel free to reach out to me on my talk page if you have any questions. Happy editing! — Mikehawk10 (talk) 00:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It is a great help! I will make sure to be more diligent moving forward to not run into these issues! Thanks again! Zune4ever (talk) 00:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

New message from Mikehawk10
— Mikehawk10 (talk) 00:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

American English and British English
I notice that you are making a lot of edits on typos and grammar. Please keep in mind the differences between American English and British English. Check to see which English an article uses before making an edit. For example, your edit to The Humans (film) because you changed the spelling of a word from American English and British English (the article is tagged with using American English). Please check before editing. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the note, I will check and make sure to be aware of that going forward. Zune4ever (talk) 03:32, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Shakti Singh (actor)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Widr (talk) 20:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * I simply changed the grammar that was a bit awkward on that post. If you feel this state works better, that is fine. I just want to make the grammar, punctuation, spelling and overall structure as good as possible. Zune4ever (talk) 20:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I just saw the edit you meant, that is my browser causing an issue, I did not intend that issue to slip though, thank you for reverting it! Zune4ever (talk) 21:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of TechRaptor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TechRaptor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/TechRaptor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GamerPro64 05:16, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must: GeneralNotability (talk) 23:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
 * State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
 * Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
 * I saw the comment you removed. Here's my question: why is the version of TechRaptor you created extremely similar to a draft made internally by an undisclosed paid editing company? GeneralNotability (talk) 23:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @GeneralNotability I based most of my notes on the site, and details from articles on the site. I read the site and tried to make my edits based on what I found by the site. I saw the article was taken down for not being notible so figured I would let it go.

even though I read it, I figured it was just not up to scratch. I had no idea it had a draft or something from some paid company, but if they were doing that, I had no idea, and very much do not think that is acceptable.

thank you for bringing this to my attention, and I am truly frustrated this sort of thing happens. thanks for reaching out and asking to clarify, that was very kind of you. I am sure managing bans and such is not easy, so giving me a chance to talk is very appreciated! Zune4ever (talk) 02:48, 19 February 2022 (UTC)


 * @GeneralNotability I should also note I am very embarrassed my edits where so close to the articles and info on the sites, that is one of the first rules in writing, and it is disctaceful to take too much from a source. Zune4ever (talk) 04:40, 19 February 2022 (UTC)