User talk:Zuzanna Jablonska

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arsenale Institute (December 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arsenale Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Arsenale_Institute Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hoary&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Arsenale_Institute reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 06:32, 9 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much! I'll look into it. I think your comment was very helpful - I am trying to find better sources and edit the article in line with your guidance. Once again, thank you for this recommendation Zuzanna Jablonska (talk) 01:41, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arsenale Institute for Politics of Representation has been accepted
 Arsenale Institute for Politics of Representation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Arsenale_Institute_for_Politics_of_Representation help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   08:26, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

To wit: sources were invented and/or falsely represented. For this article: Ben Broos never wrote such an article and it's not in the Yale 1998 book. For this edit, three of the links do not go to articles about Harrison, or they are simply dead links, and a search of those websites revealed nothing like it. Pinging, User:GrigioGrey. Drmies (talk) 14:18, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

More: in Florian Süssmayr, the Saatchi link is dead, and I can't find any mention of Süssmayr on the Saatchi website. The MOMA link goes to an event for a different artist. He is never mentioned anywhere as having worked with Iggy Pop. Etc. Drmies (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I also reverted your edits to the Constance Mayer article, bringing it back to the lastest good version of the article here, because there were a number of edits that were not credible: bare and fake urls (for some reason also wrapped in nowiki code) for information that did not appear to be correct. I don't mean to pile on, but I do want to document the unusual activity.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pomona Zipser (April 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pomona Zipser and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Pomona_Zipser Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drmies&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pomona_Zipser reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

{unblock|reason=Your reason here=Dear Yamala, Here's a link to the book you mentioned in the WorldCat catalogue. I want to emphasize that the incorrect citations were the result of my lack of experience with this situation format rather than my imagination. The article I cited is in the first chapter ('I. CONSTRUCTING VERMEER') on page 19.

https://www.worldcat.org/title/vermeer-studies/oclc/40462569}
 * That... seems to prove you invented the source, no? "From Maria Thins to Catharina Bolnes: The Inheritance of Vermeer's Pictures" does not appear there. Yes, there's a section from Ben Broos, but not what you are specifically claiming. --Yamla (talk) 12:20, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

, User:GrigioGrey,, what do you make of all this? Zuzanna Jablonska, how did Iggy Pop get into this? That 2016 reference from Punknews.org ("Iggy Pop and German Artist Florian Süssmayr collaborate on Gardenia video," Punknews.org, April 19, 2016) does not exist, and searching for Süssmayr's name on Punknews.org delivers not a single hit. , it's things like that which make me think that claimed lack of competence in citing is a ruse. Drmies (talk) 16:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I am confused. I appreciate that Zuzanna Jablonska regrets the improper edits... but am having a hard time wrapping my head around how falsifying sources is a newbie mistake, citation formatting issue, etc.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)