User talk:Zxy224

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I don't think I accused you of fabrication. Following its tagging for another editor, I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.Although you gave references, many were low quality, such as blogs, affiliated, or just reporting your press releases, like the Campaign ones
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include:  the company's well-known creative strength has led to cutting-edge and innovative business solutions... has become FCB Inferno’s most famous work to date... This campaign motivates women to exercise with confidence and to push through the fear of judgement... These empowering adverts...&mdash; and so on
 * Why is This Girl Can bolded contra MoS?
 * Why do you have an awards section, but no criticisms?


 * it's all boasting about what the company does, little about the company itself other than a location. How many employees? Turnover? Profits?
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

If you want the deleted text posted to a user page for you to improve, let me know Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

I was the editor who originally tagged FCB Inferno. It broke every single advertising-related rule in the book with regards to Wikipedia and needs thorough revision before it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. We're not picking on you, but we see articles along the same lines all the time. First of all, a good way to establish notability is to ask yourself, would an existing article have a genuine reason to link to my page? If the answer is no, it's likely your company's page doesn't belong on Wikipedia. I see it does, however as a child company of FCB with one notable project, do you not think it would be better-served being merged into the main FCB page? You might want to drop a note on its talk page to see if it would be worth adding (it's likely it would be well recieved there). Secondly, you need to write in a neutral tone: it sounded to me like you were writing to promote the company (like you would on its own Web site) rather than to provide information about it. User:Jimfbleak has provided plenty of examples above of where you went wrong there. His other points are also exactly correct. Feel free to get in touch if you would like some help revising it. ☭ cmn  ☭ ( ❝❞ /✍ ) 15:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)