User talk:Zylongaming0

Welcome!
Hello, Zylongaming0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Jim1138 (talk) 16:06, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

June 2013
Hello, I'm Amaury. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Český svaz orientačních sportů, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 14:38, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ajax file manager. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 15:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to ROF Pembrey, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Mot only did you provide no source, but your edit is contradicted by numerous sources that I have seen, one of which I have added to the article. If you have other reliable sources that support your change, then please state what those sources are. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:02, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Acclaim Games. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 16:06, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Zylongaming0", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or accounts that are shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our Conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 16:06, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Strange edit
Can you please explain what the purpose of your edit to Phyllocnistis cirrhophanes was? While most of your unhelpful edits might be considered to be the result of lack of understanding of how Wikipedia works, lack of competence in English, and other excusable causes, it is really difficult to see this one as anything other than vandalism. I will, however, be very happy if you can give a better explanation. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing, and using Wikipedia for spam. It is abundantly clear that your ten completely nonsensical edits were just made to get autoconfirmed, so that you could post spam links to a semi-protected article, complete with a deliberately misleading edit summary that pretended you were doing something totally different from what you were really doing. Posting spam to Wikipedia is unacceptable, and using such blatant dishonest methods to do so makes it even worse. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)