User talk:Zzhou1991

BR Coffee
Zzhou1991, please review the wp:Reliable Source link. Basically the LAlaw site doesn't appear to meet the RS standards. While court records would be reasonable proof that the lawsuit was filed, the issue is if the lawsuit is important enough to include in the topic. At minimum Wikipedia says that such content needs to be discussed by 3rd party "reliable sources". Also, per wp:ONUS even if a RS discusses the material it may not be considered DUE for inclusion. For instance, if a lawsuit was filed, and then dismissed we might decide that isn't important since it ultimately had little to no impact on the company (other than a small hit to the bottom line).

As a side note, I see all of your edits use the "minor edit" tag (Help:Minor_edit). Relative to the total article, the inclusion of a single lawsuit may be a minor aspect of the topic but that's not what the tag is for. The minor tag is meant for things like correcting spelling or punctuations errors. Hope that helps. Springee (talk) 21:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please take your proposed Black Rifle Coffee edits to the article's talk page. Springee (talk) 18:48, 2 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Per WP:Notability, "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". The sources Mercury News and Yahoo are secondary and verifiable by nature. Both citations have "significant coverage" to the topic. The nature of the topic is the same as the 2021 Salon article reported BRCC was trying to draw a line from the far-right. Zzhou1991 (talk) 19:34, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Black Rifle Coffee Company for edit warring to restore contentious disputed content to the article. The article talk page is available to you to discuss changes.. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ponyo bons mots 19:43, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Zzhou1991 (talk) 20:12, 2 November 2022 (UTC)