User talk:Zzrbiker

License tagging for Image:X28.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:X28.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:N110-1925.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:N110-1925.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:H220-Newport.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:H220-Newport.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 12:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:J556 at museum.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:J556 at museum.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 15:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

VR Locos
G'day I found your series of loco articles and wanted to help develop them further, the template seemed the most logical starting point. I've been pondering what to do with the diesel fleet as it is a bit of a mixed bag, with most being modified off the shelf products. My own view was to write specific VR articles and at a minimum link back to the parent products, as in most cases there were significant differences that make the VR versions unique in their own right.

I've spent most of the evening looking at how to deliniate the whole lot. My best thought was to leave the steam group as is, and then sub-divide the diesels into the VR group and include the A class, the N class and the P class in seperate, but linked, articles. The template can then be modified to list VR steam, VR railcars, VR diesels, post VR diesels and post VR railcars, which brings us right up to the the V'Locity sets. In the steam group I was planning to add a separate section for the Na and G locos.

I've also added the template to the bottom of the last section of each article, which in some cases is Preservation, in one case in Modelling and another Other Liveries. Is there a case for settling on a standardised format for all the pages and the template going at the bottom after them? Jaxsonjo 12:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Shostakovitch infobox
Actually, part of my thinking was that it was too broad, and misleading. Shostakovitch a Romantic? Well, yes, but a Romantic in the same sense as Weber or Verdi? Well, no: the infobox is misleading. Part of many reasons why these boxes for composer articles are not needed. Cheers, Moreschi Talk 19:29, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Zzrbiker/Victorian Railways L class (electric)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Zzrbiker/Victorian Railways L class (electric), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Zzrbiker/Victorian Railways L class (electric) fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: This is obviously an erroneous duplicate of Victorian Railways L class electric, but no point converting to redirect To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Zzrbiker/Victorian Railways L class (electric), please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Zzrbiker/Victorian Railways L class (electric) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Trains portal DYK items
Thanks for suggesting so many DYK items for Portal:Trains. Since I'm on vacation until August 5, my internet connectivity is somewhat curtailed (the hotel I'm in this week charges $13/day to connect; I'll be in a different city next week, so I may be more active then). Would you be able to update the portal DYK section with one of these suggestions per day if I don't get to it by mid-morning? I've updated today's entry and I've already got the selected article and pictures set up for the next two weeks, and I've also got the archive page ready for August 1. AdThanksVance. Slambo 42 (unprivileged login of Slambo) - T 15:52, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Way cool, thanks! Yes, there is a lot of copy/paste.  I typically open the candidates page in one tab, the edit link for the DYK section in a second tab and the archive page in a third tab.  I then copy the oldest suggestion that covers a region not already listed in the section to the top of the section (I also check the links and verify that the suggested image is under a free license, and put the date that I added it there in an HTML comment), remove the bottom item from the section, and copy the whole thing to the current archive page.  The main archive page will automatically display the current month's archive, so I just hit the edit link for the month section there and add the new entry to the top with a

after the HTML comment. Then I update the article's talk page to put the appropriate date in the portaldykdate parameter of the TrainsWikiProject banner, and I remove the suggestion from the candidates list. It usually takes me somewhere between 10-20 minutes per day depending on the number of links (since I check all of them as well as the image). I don't think anyone will really notice if it's updated in the evening or in the morning, and I have missed a few days in the past (when a day is skipped, I put it in the HTML comments too).
 * Now that the NMRA convention has actually begun, there's plenty for me to see and do (and way too many models for me to spend my money on). Slambo 42 (unprivileged login of Slambo) - T 01:20, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help while I was out on vacation. I'm back now and getting in to wading through about a thousand photos that I took, many of which will appear on commons soon. Slambo (Speak) 10:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:WCRlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WCRlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Australia newsletter
WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 22:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC).

WikiProject Australia newsletter
WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 22:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC).

Harold Winthrop Clapp
Nice work on the article! By the way I've been digging up bits and pieces on gauge standardisation in Australia - it probably fits into a renamed Australian broad gauge. Wongm (talk) 11:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem, I seem to have got into the habit of looking through DYK nominations for articles where in pu from the Gazette would help, he looked like a fairly likely candidate for an honour, so I looke dhim up, and for once the search pulled him straight up which doesn't always happen. If you're looking for confirmation of similar info in future, the search page is here, and because the indexing is sometimes a bit off, I've been creating a list at User:David Underdown/Honours collating all the honours lists, so if you know the year an honours was awarded, you can look them up fairly quickly there.  The London Gazette is the definitive source for all British Honours, military decorations and so on, whether awarded to British or Commonwealth citizens.   David Underdown (talk) 13:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:LNER 4472 Seymour 1988.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LNER 4472 Seymour 1988.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Nice work
Hi, nice to see someone else with an interest in Victorian railway history. The same goes for you image contributions - my shots only go back to the mid 2000s so it is good to see the gap between that and the pre-1950s public domain images filled.

I've been seeding a number of Operation Phoenix (railway) links about the place - the State Library has a stack of 1950s VR flyers about it, and I just got around to taking notes from them the other day, so the beginnings of that article should be up soon. Wongm (talk) 12:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Operation Phoenix is done now, I photographed the brochures, and since they are pre 195x (PD cutoff) I will clean them up and upload some of the photos from them. You wouldn't have any New Deal related photos by any chance for that article? Wongm (talk) 06:47, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Your POV
Thank you for telling me your point-of-view. I imagine that it is fairly obvious to you that I have a different point of view, and I don't agree with most of your POV.

"You then effectively reverted the edit by inserting the same information." No. I didn't. I chose those words very carefully. If you re-read them, you will see that although the data is similar, the information is different.

"Contrary to your assertion that "an indicative statement is better than no data at all", WP:V makes it quite clear that unreferenced, speculative information should be removed." "WP:V makes it quite clear that unreferenced, speculative information should be removed". Agreed. However, that statement is in no way contrary to my assertion that "an indicative statement is better than no data at all". If my edit was "speculative" (and unreferenced), then yes, it should be removed. But it isn't. It's just unreferenced. And when I find a precise reference, it will be neither speculative nor unreferenced.

"Do you have any verifiable sources which back up your edit?" Yes. (I am now looking for a precise reference.)

"If not, please do not re-insert information which was an educated guess at best and was rightly removed from the article." I actually agree with this sentence. However, as I do know of a verifiable source, the "If not" does not apply in this case.

In the fullness of time I will have that specific citation. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Loco articles
In cases where there were multiple steam locos with the same class letter, then using the date of introduction seems like a much better way to disambiguate them then calling them '1st' or '2nd' like what I did for Phoenix Foundry.

Another possible thing to do is split out the Rail_transport_in_Victoria section, and discuss how the Victorian Railways locomotives fleet evolved. Either a section in Victorian Railways or a new page like Victorian Railways locomotives or Victorian Railways rollingstock. Wongm (talk) 01:31, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008
The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:57, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:C1locomotive.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:C1locomotive.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 21:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:X36.JPG
File:X36.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:X 36 locomotive.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:58, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Tambo Parlor Car.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Tambo Parlor Car.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:59, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 06:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Filter exemption
Hi Zzrbiker, I made a change to the filter (I will spare you the technical details) which should allow that email-address-like image in posts now. Sorry about that, again, and thanks for reporting the problem. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 20:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Canada should convert from to
Currently in Canada, trains cannot run as fast as either in India or Russia due to standard gauge and non-electrified and single-track and wind, snow and grade. Canadian National Railways, Canadian Pacific Railways, VIA Rail and BC Rail should convert from to  and double-track and electrification 25kV AC 60Hz. 121.102.47.215 (talk) 11:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Not sure what this apparent bit of soapbox/original research is doing on my talk page. Zzrbiker (talk) 13:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

WP Trains in the Signpost
"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Trains for a Signpost article to be published this month. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 19:23, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:R707SpiritofProgress.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:R707SpiritofProgress.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 02:51, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

RfC:Infobox Road proposal
WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.


 * Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 22:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Victorian Railways C class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Herald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:J503vr.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:J503vr.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Spirit of Progress 1953.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Spirit of Progress 1953.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:20, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Vrmap47vgr.png
Thank you for uploading File:Vrmap47vgr.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Steam locomotive X 32, circa 1950.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Steam locomotive X 32, circa 1950.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:AA class locomotive.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:AA class locomotive.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:41, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 18 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Victorian Railways X class page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=695763972 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F695763972%7CVictorian Railways X class%5D%5D Ask for help])

VR R class
It’s always nice to be brought into a bunfight that you have nothing to do with. As you seemed unwilling or unable to take any of these changes on board, I have added about 30 or so one by one. No none were major, but clearly there was scope for enhancement. The purpose of the expanded infobox which I pinched from another article was to allow some of these to be filled with additional information I have. But as I have lost interest in doing so, probably no longer of any real benefit. I was going to do so to a number of similar articles, but quite frankly can’t be bothered given the high likelihood of them being reversed. Haven’t done Wiki for a number of years, seems the lunacy which drove me away in the first place remains. 115.186.199.190 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:55, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

File:B class at Ballarat.jpg
G'day Zzrbiker, I notice that File:B class at Ballarat.jpg, which you uploaded, does not have any source information, or a date of publication. In order to satisfy copyright requirements this information is required to prove why it is in the public domain. Are you able to add this information to the file description page? Thank you for your time. Regards. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Model railway section in VR pages
Hey,

Noted your thread re the T class page. Cenovoice has been blocked from Wiki for sockpuppeting, but before that he managed to remove my model railway contributions on a number of pages.

I've changed the format of the P Class entry so its less disruptive to the flow of the page, and I've added a similar text-only history for the S Class page. But given the range of manufacturers and variants for the X and T locos, I think those pages should probably stay as-is for now. T Class is fairly succinct given the level of detail, and the table is useful for comparing releases across brands. X Class really should be cleaned up, but given the plethora of manufacturers I haven't yet decided how to do it.

Anothersignalman (talk) 15:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

File:SoP70s.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SoP70s.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 17:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)