User talk:Zzuuzz/Archive 12

sorry
it was for the purposes of a joke which went too far. i was going to change it back though, honest! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.165.142 (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

barnstar
THis is for reverting vandalism. Barnstargurl (talk) 19:22, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

vandalism
im sorry for vandalizing. -User:LBHS Cheerleader aka Barnstargurl (talk) 19:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank you for your prompt response to 204.14.12.84's vandalism!--Finalnight (talk) 17:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

What personal opinion?
Could you clarify what you had in mind when you deleted my contribution? --Vladko (talk) 19:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My mistake and apologies - I removed the wrong bit. I have since corrected myself. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Rollback request
Hi there. I'm interested in the ability to rollback. Please consider me as an option for having rollback ability. Thanks. Casull (talk) 11:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for granting rollback abilities. I'll wield the my newfound power with responsibility. Casull (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Please block 71.3.65.46
71.3.65.46 appears to be a sockpuppet of User:LBHS Cheerleader and needs to be blocked. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 02:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Rugrats characters
An editor has nominated List of Rugrats characters, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Asia
Hi Zzuuzz, there seems to be a user removing Georgia from the Asia page for unknown reasons, as well as the main map. Would you be able to keep an eye on it if possible? The user name is LEITBE. Lee Valdæs (talk) 06:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Penis vandalism
why did you undo my edits? that wasnt very nice! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Judge Damien French (talk • contribs) 15:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Tor Nodes
I see you blocked those Tor Exit Nodes already, but I did post them at WP:OP anyway. Momusufan (talk) 20:56, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Stupid
Another editor has added the  template to the article Stupid, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Garethlikesballsinhisface
I see from the edit history of Usernames_for_administrator_attention that you blocked the above user name for being offensive. No block notice appears on the user's talk page, and I was just curious why no notice. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 17:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Mainly because he knows why the username was blocked, both in an obvious sense, and through the templated block message. I could have left a block message on the talk page, but this would only be for the benefit of those who didn't check the block log, and would only otherwise generate a page which would have to be deleted in a month anyway. Sometimes I do, sometimes not... -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Scott A. Brown
Do you know who this Scott Brown guy the IP was talking about is?--CyberGhostface (talk) 23:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * A vandal spammed the same message to dozens of user talk pages using open proxies in the last few hours (see my blocking log). It's probably a long story, but this history may give some insight. You should ignore it. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

User talk:209.252.101.90
Hi, I know I might be a bit biased, but that IP address vandalized my talk page, and I propose that the block be either indefinite or made longer ( 1 ). – The  Obento   Musubi  17:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you know when a different user will be using the IP address, or whether this user will be using another IP address? -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

why
did you delete my comment to user 81.168.90.24‎?? it was perfectly fine, expecially seeing as it is my son who i was sending that particular comment to. --Thomyeeha (talk) 16:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Spam link
Is it possible to blacklist this governwhore.com [full url removed]? It's being added to pages related to Ashley Alexandra Dupre. I reverted a users edits at NY Confidential that had the aforementioned link. Momusufan (talk) 19:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Doesn't look very encyclopaedic does it. As it has only happened once I'll keep an eye on it, with a view to blacklisting it if it continues. There is also a request currently in at WT:WPSPAM which I'll keep an eye on. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism by 172.xxx
Hi. It appears that an AOL (as you said) is using multiple IPs to vandalise Wikipedia pages in a similar manner. Should they be blocked/reported to AIV on sight because it's probably the same user? Should all pages vandalised by these IPs be semiprotected (wow all this happened less than 10 minutes ago)? Thanks. ~ A H  1 (TCU) 23:11, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Block on sight, and semi-protect where possible. The IPs have a duration between about 30 seconds and 3 hours (as they choose). -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for taking care of the vandalism on my user page! Kurt Weber ( Go Colts! ) 01:08, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. -- zzuuzz (talk) 01:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

121.90.87.26
It's an IP changing block evader. See and. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 14:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeed. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

81.145.242.24
It's a soft block, so users can still create accounts from that one ip address, no range block was done afaict. I did a longer block because this was the second bock this month alone, and there is a long string of warning over the last two months. I'll leave it up to your discretion, feel free to shorten if you like. Dreadstar †  01:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, if it's reallocated every 24 hours, that one IP address certainly seems to have an affinity for being allocated to vandals; looks like about six different vandals in the past 30 days alone. Maybe it's a cursed IP address!  Dreadstar  †  01:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh..don't tempt me...;) Dreadstar †  01:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
For reverting vandalism to my user page. --John (talk) 05:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem! -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Stop Blocking the Bangor Grammar School Changes
Every Change I made was 100% true. The Banter Bus Club does exist and so does James Edwards. He has given Permission for his name to be used! The Rules say that anything that violates copyright or is not varifiable is subject to deletion as is anything that is deemed to be bullying or lible. Both of these changes are None of the above. I would appreciate you telling me your reasons for deletion, and why are Bangor Grammar School Pupils not allowed to edit articles relating to their school so long as they are non malicious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Lady Princess Duchess (talk • contribs)
 * Please take a look at the other policies. For example, "just notable for being in existance" requires a verifiable independent reliable source. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. They've been at it for a while and they appear to be stemming from here, not to mention all these. Rudget . 15:01, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sexual predator
An editor has nominated Sexual predator, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Chinese British
I believe the renaming of the article was the correct thing, but when I tried moving British Chinese to Chinese British, a message came up saying that it was already a page, and that is why I had to move it by myself. Apologise if this has created confusion, but Chinese British is definately the correct term - the UK's National Statistics which conducted the 2001 Census states the ethnic group as 'Chinese or Chinese British', British Chinese means Chinese people of British descent, which is completely missleading - see aslo Chinese American, Chinese Canadian, Chinese Australian etc. I would appreciate it if you reverted it back, thanks Stevvvv4444 (talk) 13:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The correct title is the one which is most common, as has been pointed out in the naming conventions. The is undoubtedly British Chinese, by a long way. The correct procedure for renaming it is to gain consensus through the requested moves procedure, though I have to say I think you are unlikely to get your way. -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Cascade protection
Please see my response before someone uploads a giant penis picture into Commons. Could be any second... 65.213.184.1 (talk) 13:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

removal of cosmetic dentistry link?
Hello, can you clarify why you removed my link please? The linked site is a definitive guide to cometic dentistry and supported by professional dental practitioners from around the world. It is supported by ads but that is only to help cover bandwidth bills. It is also of significantly higher quality from a content perspective than others sites you have left linked on that page? What is your rationale please? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.32.66.54 (talk) 14:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi. I don't really see what distinguishes this site from the thousands of other made for adsense sites that get spammed to dentistry articles. Is the BDA involved? Is the site recommended by reliable news or academic sources as a trusty source of neutral information? Who says that this site is definitive, apart from its owners, the web design company, and those receiving revenue from its adverts? Sites that are being promoted by those who have an interest in promoting them are generally not linked to. See WP:EL for more information on the detail of Wikipedia's guidelines. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

re:autobiography
I wasn't trying to be uncivil, my understanding was that while NPOV biographies written by an uninvolved third party were acceptable if the subject is notable, autobiograhies on the other hand were not. In addition to being a COI, WP:BLP makes it clear that biographical information must be neutral, independent, and verifiable. I felt that this one in paticular read like a resume. Twinkle always leaves the same "form template" whenever something is tagged under CSD, normally these work fine, but the spam G11 template was not appropriate in this case, next time I'll uncheck the box and write my own comment on the person's talk page. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 21:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you, that seems reasonable. You'll notice the comments about 'vanity' at the AfD. With real people it is always best to delete their article without offending them. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for getting rid of the vandalism on my userpage. I really appreciate it. Happy editing! Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 14:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC) 

Thingg &#8853; &#8855; has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
 * You're welcome! -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Goatse
You know the image that I put on people's user pages (AKA Goatse)? Am I allowed to put it on my user page? Please don't block me for trying to talk to you. 86.29.133.181 (talk) 16:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It would probably be treated as vandalism and you would probably be blocked again, not least for evading your current block. -- zzuuzz (talk) 16:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * oops. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

popups
I am having issues with Popups. I use IE and have Rollback, however I can't seem to get it to use correctly. Any suggestions?  D u s t i talk to me 17:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems to be working now? -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Reverting
Do all of AkhtaBot's edits in the template space need reverting per the AN discussion?  MBisanz  talk 18:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No not all. Only the additions in the template namespace which are outside of the noinclude should either be reverted or placed within the noinclude section. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Recent Block
You recently place a block on 24.39.182.101. This is my school, thank you for finally blocking it, the school has received enough "last warnings". However, can you do this without erasing the entire talk page? If you feel a response is needed, please do so on my talk page. Thanks --Omnipotence407 (talk) 01:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle story arcs
Due to Mister Senseless's inappropriate non-admin closure of this AfD, the second article that was part of the AfD, List of Tsubasa: Reservoir Chronicle Episode From The Manga, has been left in total limbo. Should it be renominated on its own or can it just be deleted as a housekeeping task as it was a duplicate of the other article, which was deleted through redirection. Or does the whole AfD need to be reopened? Collectonian (talk) 06:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Deleted per AfD. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) Collectonian (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey
I didn't get your response to my question in the hi article because someone vandalized the talk page.Mooncrest (talk) 21:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Forrest J. Ackerman
Hello. I really want to know why you made that edit swipe.

Really. You personal friends with him? Jeeze. I have sat with him for dinner. I have met him three times now that I think of it. I would not be here today without his inspiring words he gave me.

So. I want to know why did edit it out? Kinda silly to do that. An explanation is wanted. I wouldn't edit your contribution. Thanks, Electric Japan (talk) 04:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Hello. The edit before mine was made by an open proxy vandalbot. It duplicated several existing paragraphs (25 I believe), resulting in two infoboxes, two photos, and so on. And so I reverted it. Then Orangemike came along and reverted my edit, then realised his mistake and restored my edit. I believe all is now well, but if you are not content with the changes that have occurred since your last edit to the article, then you should speak to Orangemike. Let me know if I can help further. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I will try it again. I had no idea this kind of stuff happened on this site. Just providing useful info. on Ackerman.

Thanks. Electric Japan (talk) 12:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Stick around :) -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Block
Could you please block User:64.230.42.169. For vandalizing both our pages. Thanks, Gaia Octavia Agrippa T | C 12:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That one already blocked, and the one below. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * thanks. This is really annoying though, being targeted by vandals. Gaia Octavia Agrippa T | C 12:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Would you be interested in semi-protection for your userpages? -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:43, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, I am new to wikipedia, would you be so kind as to help me meet some of the other users here? Thank you so much! 64.230.40.70 (talk) 12:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Not vandalising and contributing constructively would be a good start. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Internets
Hello, this is Mr Jarvis, has my son been here vandalizing wikipedia again? 64.230.93.27 (talk) 12:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm having a blast, you? 64.230.43.229 (talk) 12:42, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Bed time
Well, I'm tired, so bed time!

You might as well unblock the other IPs I had, since the chances of me getting them again when I reconnect are very very slim (dynamically assigned). Maybe put that "Bell Sympatico Shared IP" template on them, I remember seeing one once. You did good reverting and blocking, you were getting pretty fast! Anyhow, ttyl! 64.230.40.25 (talk) 12:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Blanking
Hi Zzuuzz. I was just wondering why you blanked the talk page of [ real name removed as a courtesy ]. She's been blocked for self-promotion, harassment, and abuse of IPsocks. I was planning on restoring the block notice and sockmaster tag, but I wanted to see what your thinking on the subject was first. Best, -- B figura (talk) 23:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see it's up on ANI. N/m -- B figura (talk) 23:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello, yes I blanked it as a human courtesy, and as the content does not help improve the encyclopaedia. I would hope that will be respected. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My concern here is that this makes it easier for her to resume self-promotion at some point, and makes it harder to keep track of IP socks. While I understand the courtesy argument, the fact that she's repeatedly violated policy, then lied about doing so (as FT2 elaborates on) makes me disinclined to trust her. That said though, I'm content to leave it as is, unless she resumes self-promotion (or other sorts of disruption). Best, -- B figura (talk) 23:15, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The sock tag did not in fact have any further information, and additionally, using an IP address is not exactly socking in the traditional sense. However I understand your concerns, and it is safe to say that this is dependent on no further disruption. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. (I was under a misapprehension about the sockmaster tag, thanks for clearing that up). And on another note, should the ANI post and this one in the sandbox be taken as a request to vanish? I'd leave some information about the right to vanish on her talk page, but I have a feeling that if it came from me, it might bias her thoughts somewhat. Cheers, -- B figura (talk) 23:23, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I have implemented her right to vanish for her. I think we can take the WP:AN post as a request to vanish, and in blanking the talk page I retained the CAT:TEMP, which will result in a total vanish anyway in about a month. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

about vandalism
vandalism is defined as deliberate destruction of or damage to public or private property wikipedia web pages are no ones property therefore i am not vandalising Teknoviking07 (talk) 11:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has its own definition. Are you suggesting your edit was intentionally accurate? -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Why does wikipedia get to have its own definition. I only accept my definitions from the dictionary because Wikipedia can't be trusted. So whatever your definition is must be a lie. Therefore I did not vandalise -- Teknoviking07 (talk) 12:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That is not relevant. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure it is. If I didn't vandalise anything, I didn't do anything wrong -- Teknoviking07 (talk) 12:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Vandalism. It is sensible not to test the limits of this policy. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Wiki means my opinion is of equal importance to yours. I think i should be able to contribute to the vandalism policy -- Teknoviking07 (talk) 12:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You are welcome to propose changes on the policy's talk page. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * So you agree my opinion is of equal importance. Why cant i make changes to the grammar page when i feel the need? --- Teknoviking07 (talk) 12:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Are you suggesting your edit was intentionally accurate? -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It was in my mind --- Teknoviking07 (talk) 12:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Then you should watch out for the blocking policy instead. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I disagree with the blocking policy because wikipedia admins are biased against my opinions. Blocking is just your way of oppressing the weak within the collaborative online encyclopedia community. We need a broader range of views from the community. I should be made an admin --- Teknoviking07 (talk) 12:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That may be so. And it's not a dictionary :) -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:49, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't say dictionary --- Teknoviking07 (talk) 12:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * OK. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You edited what i said back to frame me. Yet another example of oppression --- Teknoviking07 (talk) 12:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Pangbourne College
Hi, this wasnt intendded to be vandalism, I was trying to replace a referenced link as to former pupuils, that I have now done, but I think I made an error first time round. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hootertime27 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

wp:op


 ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Hi. I would just like to say thanks for all the active blocking of my reports on wp:op. I hope that this will now become one of my "projects" on Wikipedia. Again thanks. p.s. i just added 8 more that you can check ^^.  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 14:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

An office joke
My co-worker sent me the following message this morning: "You did it again Jas. Just go to Wikipedia, look up "moron," and paste my photo there, will ya?" The intent was to change it back immediately after she saw it, but you were quicker on the draw. NCFR (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: WP:OP archiving
-- Cobi(t 01:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar!
In going through the whole page, your comment explained the actual issue, something that everyone else seemed to only refer to tangently. That, and with no WP:BITE : ) - Nicely done. - jc37 18:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it's taken a lot of practice :/ If only the solution could be so straightforward. -- zzuuzz (talk) 00:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
For reverting all those Social Network > Emo changes. I wonder why someone would go to all that trouble to make the changes in the first place. Any wisdom? Bellagio99 (talk) 00:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The motivation of a vandal? Who knows. Their final edit before blocking may give some insight. -- zzuuzz (talk) 00:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Aha
Another fan of cookery :) Feel free to log it under mine (if you haven't) Thanks -- Herby  talk thyme 13:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done I caught those on the 11th and 12th along with some of the domains you added, again open proxies, and I found a sock too. -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Good news & thanks. I've just run them through Eagle's linksearch & they seem to be only targeting en wp for now, cheers -- Herby  talk thyme 13:51, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

IP Vandal

 * Thank you for blocking the user who vandalized my talk page. I appreciate this very much. ♥ Shapiros10  Wuz  Here ♥ 01:00, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

mTAB
i realize all the content i inserted should go under mTAB.. but i don't see any of it there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.124.51.254 (talk) 18:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Your edits were reverted after you were seen to inexplicably remove some of your additions. Using an Edit summary would help with this problem. You should still add independent references for the information. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, i have been trying to create a page for the software mTAB. It still says i haven't cited any sources, but i have added one now. Just wanted to know when the notification will be gone from the page. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by K8nmodha (talk • contribs) 18:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello. The notice at the top refers to Notability. The article needs some work to reach this standard. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:49, 25 April 2008 (UTC)