Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/December 2006/Animedude360

Case Filed On: 09:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:



Other Wikipedians this pertains to:



Wikipedia pages this pertains to:



Questions:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
 * Answer:Yes

'''How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)'''
 * Answer: content dispute.

'''What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.'''
 * Answer:disengagement.

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
 * Answer:Resolution

Summary:
There is some debate over the page Human (Dragon Ball). A few users (who may in fact be the same person) have contiunually merged it with Dragon World, without first reaching a consensus on the talk page, or even adressing it there. The page has been reverted twice and when asked to atleast discuss the issue on the talk page before such a radical change, these users ignore this request and re-merge the article. Numerous posts on the talk page of Human (Dragon Ball) suggested that a majority of people see the page a useful within the context of races shown on the show. Not to mention numerous other pages of its kind exists, where a medai deals with human beings who differ from real ones and co-exist with diffrent sentient races. This includes the pages Human (Star Wars), Human (Star Trek) and even Man (Middle-earth). I would like for the above listed users to stop merging the page without concent, so that an actually discussion on wheter it should be merged can take place.

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

AMA Information
Case Status: closed

Advocate Status: The conflict is now calm.
 * Sir james paul