Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/December 2006/Techie guru

Wikipedian filing request:



Other Wikipedians this pertains to:



Wikipedia pages this pertains to:



12:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Questions:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
 * Answer: NO

'''How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)'''
 * Answer: content dispute,personal attact

'''What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.'''
 * Answer: I have made multiple attempts to make contact with Fedia. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Keystroke_logging ( I have 3 comments, requests, suggestions)

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
 * Answer: I would like receive an answer to why I am having an internal link removed by Fedia, he is basically going to articles that I added an Internal link to. I added these links as it was suggested that I find other articles in Wikipedia that were relevant.

Summary:
Hello: I seem to be having a problem with Fedia, I have made several attempts to make contact with this user. He is going to various pages that I have added internal links to another article and removing them. I am trying to be very fair with his reasoning, but it does get a little frustrating to see that Fedia has a pattern of removing links from specific articles. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Keystroke_logging). Fedia states he is removing commercial links (specifically SpectorSoft) because it is a commercial link, yet at the same time he removes an internal link he deems commercial, he continues to leave keylogger.org as an example keylogger site. While I can understand that, I find it odd that he will remove my internal link, but leave that affiliate web site on the article. Additionally, I do not understand why I am getting reccomendations to do specific things, i follow the suggestions to find relevant internal links and Fedia continues to remove the internal links. I would like to have someone please try and find a solution to this as I have spent a great deal of time writing that article, but I have also started to add relevant content to other articles. Thank you. Techie guru 12:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Discussion:
'''Hello. Would you mind if we discuss your dispute on your talk page?'''
 * Has not answered yet.


 * That would be fine, and I have aslo responded on my talk page, thank you.

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

AMA Information
Case Status: open

Advocate Status:
 * Bushcarrot
 * I can't budget my time for this case. My apologies. Happy Holidays! Bushc a rrot ( Talk·Desk ) 23:26, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * OK - in future, it's best to put cases you can't take right now into the "new" category, unless you wish to take it up later :). For now, I'm going to re-open the case. Mart inp23 18:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Accepting case; Anthony cfc  [ T &bull; C] 01:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)