Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/December 2006/roger the red

Case Filed On: 02:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:



Other Wikipedians this pertains to:



Wikipedia pages this pertains to:


 * American Mutoscope and Biograph Company

Questions:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
 * Answer: Yes

'''How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)'''
 * Answer: Policy violation. I am attempting to post "Cite sources" and "Dispute" notices on an article so other editors may investigate the verifiable sources, and possibly shed new light and add sources. I have been censored and "Controlled" with anything that I post to a point of censorship which is against Wikipedia policies. This is not the first time I have been "Censored" by this member. The last incident this evening was when one of the editors (Also a member of the "Arbitration" committee) interogated me on what souces I wanted to cite and why. This suggests that I give this person all the information as to censor what this editor wants to include or not. the notices were put up for the other editors as described in the "Talk" page. Please review this and enforce your policies. I was going to give up on Wikipedia, but it seems these "Tactics" need to be addressed and corrected. Please look at the article, the discussion pages, my talk page, all of it. Thank you.

'''What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.'''
 * Answer:I was told it would do me "No good" since I was wrong and to "Deal with it". This is the kind of tactics that are being used.

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
 * Answer: Enforce Wikipedia policy, and rescend this editor's arbitration committee involvement.
 * Clarification: I am an admin but not a member of the Arbitration Committee. -Will Beback · † · 01:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Summary:

 * is banned and no longer edits wikipedia.

Discussion:
This dispute appears centered on this edit:. -Will Beback · † · 05:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

AMA Information
Case Status: closed

Advocate Status:
 * I take this case, as my first. - Tutmosis  00:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)