Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/January 2007/

Case Filed On: 14:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:



Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/January 2007/dwaink

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:



Wikipedia pages this pertains to:'


 * Kelsang Gyatso
 * talk:Kelsang Gyatso

Questions:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?

YesDwaink 23:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

'''How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)'''

I firmly believe the article(as it stands) opens wiki to possible libel/slander charges. Because the article slanders(negative light), by mentioning the political attacks and the disengagement by the Dali Lama from formerly acceptable Shugden practioners, especially since one of them that remain seperated from him, was one of his own teachers(HH's teacher also).I wish there to be no controversy on Kelsang's page, but if i am forced to live with it, then the other, equally valid side, of this arguement must be added in the same level of wiki as the charges lay. I don't think HH will stand for that long and perhaps we Buddhist can get back to practicing our paths rather than be forced into deeper public inspection of this "political" dirty laundry, and remove the negative light from this mans Wiki page. Dwaink 23:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

'''What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.'''

just wiki my name....dwainkDwaink 23:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

Full balance to this article, by removal of charges of controversy or addition of the answers'responses to these charges at the same wiki level as the charges are made. Dwaink 23:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

Dwaink 23:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

AMA Information
Case Status: NEW

Advocate Status:
 * None assigned.