Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/January 2007/jgisler596

Case Filed On: 18:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Case Closed On: 00:24, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:



Other Wikipedians this pertains to:



Wikipedia pages this pertains to:



Questions:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
 * Answer: Yes I have

'''How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)'''
 * Answer: This is a conten dispute, the user keeps changing the content to slanderous material, and we keep changing it back. This needs to stop.

'''What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.'''
 * Answer: We have been just checking the article a few times a day and changing it back or removing the incorrect edits.

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
 * Answer: I would like to know how to stop this users from posting incorrect material that is untrue, along with a way to monitor changes.

Summary:
User:Jgisler596 has repeatedly blanked the National Institute on Media and the Family article and replaced its contents with copyvio'd material from. J. Gisler had not attempted any sort of dispute resolution nor outlined any content dispute prior to this request for assistance. The first communication from Gisler that I received was a note telling me to stop editing the article in question.ˉˉanetode╦╩ 21:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Discussion:
I close this case as per there is nothing to discuss between jgisler596 & Anetode. Cocoaguy 従って contribstalk 00:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

AMA Information
Case Status: closed

Advocate Status:
 * None assigned.