Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/November 2006/Felipec

Wikipedian filing request:



Other Wikipedians this pertains to:



Wikipedia pages this pertains to:



Questions:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
 * Answer: Yes

'''How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)'''
 * Answer: I would say content dispute. User:Timeshifter is continiously defending content that is biased, and reverting back deletions, (example). He even stated that I'm vandalizing, so maybe it's personal attack too, or policy violation (not assuming good-faith).

'''What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.'''
 * Answer: I've talked a lot with User:Timeshifter, disengaged for a while, and conducted (unsuccessfully) a survey.

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
 * Answer: Get help regarding the best direction in order to improve the article.

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

AMA Information
Case Status: open

Advocate Status:
 * Walton monarchist89 volunteered to take the case.