Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/November 2006/YCTorah

Wikipedian filing request:



Other Wikipedians this pertains to:



Wikipedia pages this pertains to:



Questions:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
 * Answer: Yes

'''How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)'''
 * Answer: Unfair basis of rejecting reliable postings from reliable sources from THE SOURCE, and not an outside party

'''What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.'''
 * Answer: Responded back to her through USER TALK

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
 * Answer: I want to post factual information about our school without having it constantly rejected on an invalid basis.

Summary:
Please see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:YCTorah Who should I email to get answers to basic questions such as: - How one proves that he/she is a reliable source? - What types of information will they accept for the encyclopedia? If we want similar information posted as on entries for other educational institutions such as University of Judaism for example? All we are trying to achieve, is correct representation of our institution and the important work it does in educating open Modern Orthodox clergy. This user is preventing me, the school, from doing so.

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

AMA Information
Case Status: closed

No further contact on case from petitioner. DPeterson talk 11:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC) Advocate Status: DPeterson talk 12:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)