Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/October 2006/Pez1103

Wikipedian filing request:



Other Wikipedians this pertains to:



Wikipedia pages this pertains to:



Questions:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
 * Answer:

'''How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)'''
 * Answer: I THINK THAT THE ARTICLE IS VERY BIASED. HERD OF SWINE OPERATES AN ANTIMORGELLON WEBSITE AND IS USING WIKIPEDIA TO FURTHER HIS AGENDA.  I WOULD LIKE A BALANCED ARTICLE THAT REPRESENTS BOTH SIDES OF THE ISSUE.  IT IS CURRENTLY UNKNOWN WHETHER MORGELLONS IS PHYISCAL DISEASE -- THE CDC IS INVESTIGATING.  THE ARTICLE CURRENTLY IMPLIES THAT IT IS A MENTAL ILLNESS.

'''What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.'''
 * Answer:DISCUSSION PAGE

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
 * Answer: I WANT A UNBIASED ARTICLE

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

AMA Information
Case Status: closed

I don't think this is something AMA deals with. The answer to question "What do you expect to get from Advocacy?", I WANT A UNBIASED ARTICLE, is unrelated to the role AMA advocates fill. / Fred-Chess 11:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. This request is a bit inappropriate. Since we are going to be bringing up a case rejection process at the next AMA meeting, for now I'm going to list this case as "Under Investigation". אמר Steve Caruso  ( desk / AMA )  17:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Closing this case primarily due to advocee inactivity (no edits since November 9). If needs be, feel free to open another request. Mart inp23  18:37, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed case. SilkTork 01:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Advocate Status:
 * None assigned.