Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/September 2006/tiggertrouble

Wikipedian filing request:



Other Wikipedians this pertains to:



Wikipedia pages this pertains to:



Questions:
Have you read the AMA FAQ?
 * Answer:Yes

'''How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)'''
 * Answer:policy violation

'''What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.'''
 * Answer:None. Others have given some warnings to some of the IPs used but it looks like they have various IPs. User talk:88.108.51.238 User talk:88.108.51.191 User talk:88.111.129.102

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
 * Answer:What to do/Who I should talk to or help discussing the matter with the individual who is making a number of changes to certain pages inappropriately

Summary:
I believe an individual who is sometimes logged in as Theradioguy but usually on IPs 88.108.*.* continues to change gender references on articles including phat pants inappropriately. Any references to girls will be changed to "someone", any nonspecific reference such as rave or raver will be changed to male rave or male. Other articles they continue to make the same changes to include hoodies, baggy jeans, baseball cap, sagging (fashion), and others. External links that have been added to phat pants as proof that guys and girls wear phat pants have been either deleted entirely or had just the word girls removed. Links to other articles on these pages get the same treatment. They have also been editing questionably on articles such as rape, violence against women, brassiere, etc. The edits they make are usually full of spelling and punctuation mistakes and other typos, often quite a few in a row. The edit summaries they list are often different from the changes they have actually made.

Followup:
When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
 * Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
 * Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
 * Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
 * Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
 * Answer:

AMA Information
Case Status: closed

Advocate Status: Accepted Addhoc 20:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC)