Wikipedia:Administrator review/Salvio giuliano


 * The following discussion is closed. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Another editor suggested I could profit from an Administrator Review and I liked the idea of receiving feedback on my admin actions; so, here I am. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:14, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for participating here. I think that it always reflects well on anyone who does so. And in your case, I've definitely seen you around a lot, and everything I've seen has looked spot-on to me. I cannot think of anything where I would object to what I've seen you do. --Tryptofish (talk) 15:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * After checking all of your admin logs, I just found that what you said on my talk page, you don't really go for media, Giving users file mover rights is like working with media. But that is just an opinion.    Ebe 123   (+) $talk Contribs$ 18:48, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * In the very recent day or so, you unblocked someone and got a lot of blowback for doing so. Two suggestions: (1) keeping in mind how ArbCom recently addressed the so-called second mover advantage, you probably should have been slower to make the unblock, especially considering the lack of clear support at ANI, and (2) about that emoticon, this was one of those places where humor doesn't play well on the Internet (and don't I know that!). --Tryptofish (talk) 20:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Salvio was particularly helpful regarding a matter I approached him about; took the time to explain and encourage me. I felt very positive about the whole interaction and wouldn't hesitate to approach him again in the future. This for me in the pinnacle of what an admin and ArbCom should be. Mkdw talk 06:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have had interactions with Salvio on a number of occasions over a year or so, and have always found him to be balanced, firm and fair. Keep it up. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 00:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * We interacted twice. The first time I was impressed how boldly you talked to a blocking admin about unblocking in a difficult case. The second time (now as arb) I was surprised how firmly you defended the overly simple concept that banning a single editor would solve a problem, while I still believe that bringing a few selected projects in line with the majority of Wikipedia as shown here would be the more promising approach. For how long should classical composers and their works not be available for DBpedia because some authors of their articles get arb support for owning them, while authors of other articles are restricted to not have their articles as they wish? Kafkaesque comes to mind. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:35, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * For fairness (I asked another admin on review the same question): what do you see in this diff? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:22, 6 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.