Wikipedia:Ambassadors/Research/Article quality/Priority 2

Post

 * Reviewer 1

Reviewer:

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 5
 * Sourcing: 3
 * Neutrality: 2
 * Readability: 1
 * Formatting: 1
 * Illustrations: 1

Total: 13 –p joe f (talk • contribs) 09:44, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Reviewer 2

Reviewer: Graeme Bartlett (talk)

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 6.2
 * Sourcing: 4
 * Neutrality: 2
 * Readability: 2
 * Formatting: 1.5
 * Illustrations: 0.5

Total: 16.2
 * Only a small addition was made here, but quality of formatting was lower than the exiting content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:32, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Reviewer 3

Reviewer: Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 21:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 5
 * Sourcing: 4
 * Neutrality: 2
 * Readability: 2
 * Formatting: 1
 * Illustrations: 1

Total: 15 Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 21:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Pre

 * Reviewer 1

Reviewer:

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 2
 * Sourcing: 4
 * Neutrality: 2
 * Readability: 1
 * Formatting: 1
 * Illustrations: 0

Total: 10 –p joe f (talk • contribs) 09:50, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Reviewer 2

Reviewer: Mattsenate (talk) 01:14, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 3
 * Sourcing: 2
 * Neutrality: 3
 * Readability: 3
 * Formatting: 2
 * Illustrations: 0

Total: 13


 * Reviewer 3

Reviewer: Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 21:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 3
 * Sourcing: 4
 * Neutrality: 3
 * Readability: 3
 * Formatting: 2
 * Illustrations: 0

Total: 15 Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 21:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Post

 * Reviewer 1

Reviewer:

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 4
 * Sourcing: 3
 * Neutrality: 2
 * Readability: 1
 * Formatting: 1
 * Illustrations: 0

Total: 11 –p joe f (talk • contribs) 09:50, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Reviewer 2

Reviewer: Mattsenate (talk) 02:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 4
 * Sourcing: 2
 * Neutrality: 2
 * Readability: 1
 * Formatting: 1
 * Illustrations: 0

Total: 10


 * Reviewer 3

Reviewer: Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 22:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 4
 * Sourcing:3
 * Neutrality: 2
 * Readability: 1
 * Formatting: 1
 * Illustrations: 0

Total: 11 Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 22:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Comment: (I'd really like to give this .5; 1 feels too generous, but 0 is too harsh.) about formatting Lfcampos (talk) 23:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Pre

 * Reviewer 1

Reviewer:

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 4
 * Sourcing: 3
 * Neutrality: 2
 * Readability: 1
 * Formatting: 1
 * Illustrations: 0

Total: 11 –p joe f (talk • contribs) 09:50, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Reviewer 2

Reviewer: Mattsenate (talk) 02:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 5
 * Sourcing: 2
 * Neutrality: 2
 * Readability: 2
 * Formatting: 2
 * Illustrations: 0

Total: 13


 * Reviewer 3

Reviewer: AIR corn (talk) 10:11, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 4
 * Sourcing: 2
 * Neutrality: 2
 * Readability: 2
 * Formatting: 2
 * Illustrations: 0

Total: 12

Pre

 * Reviewer 1

Reviewer:

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 5
 * Sourcing: 2
 * Neutrality: 2
 * Readability: 1
 * Formatting: 2
 * Illustrations: 1

Total: 13 –p joe f (talk • contribs) 11:58, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Reviewer 2

Reviewer: Dcoetzee 01:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 3
 * Sourcing: 1
 * Neutrality: 2
 * Readability: 3
 * Formatting: 2
 * Illustrations: 1

Total: 12


 * Reviewer 3

Reviewer: Graeme Bartlett (talk)

Scores:
 * Comprehensiveness: 4
 * Sourcing:1
 * Neutrality:2
 * Readability:2
 * Formatting: 1
 * Illustrations:0.5

Total:10.5