Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Cases/2013

This is an archive of the results of all cases completed by the Arbitration Committee in 2013.


 * More recently-closed cases on top

=2013= 12 cases.

December

 * Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ottoman Empire–Turkey naming dispute closed 23 December 2013 (AN Notice)
 * is indefinitely prohibited from changing 'Turkey' or 'Turkish' to 'Ottoman' on any article.
 * 's topic ban from "editing any article relating to Turkish military history in and predating World War I" is suspended and will be unsuspended (and the prohibition will take effect) if any uninvolved administrator blocks RoslynSKP for misconduct relating to Turkish military history. If the block is reversed or repealed by any of the usual community channels of appeal, the topic ban will lapse back into suspension.
 * RoslynSKP is prohibited from making any more than one revert on any one page in any 72-hour period.
 * For a period of one year, RoslynSKP is prohibited from adding maintenance tags, such as, to any article or section of an article without first raising her concern on the talkpage and obtaining the agreement of at least one other editor that the tag is appropriate.
 * is reminded to avoid edit warring, and to use dispute resolution to assist in resolving disputes.

November

 * Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ebionites 3 closed 4 November 2013 (AN Notice)
 * and are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with each other (subject to the ordinary exceptions).
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to Ebionites, broadly construed.
 * requested removal of his administrator rights on 1 November 2013, while these arbitration proceedings were in progress (log of removal). John Carter may regain these rights only through a new request for adminship.

October

 * Arbitration/Requests/Case/Manning naming dispute closed 11 October 2013 (AN Notice)
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed.
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to any transgender topic or individual, broadly construed. He is also topic banned from all pages (including biographies) related to leaks of classified information, broadly construed.
 * is admonished for acting in a manner incompatible with the community's expectations of administrators (see ).
 * is indefinitely prohibited from using his administrator permissions (i) on pages relating to transgender people or issues and (ii) in situations involving such pages. This restriction may be first appealed after six months have elapsed, and every six months thereafter.
 * The standard discretionary sanctions adopted in Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sexology for (among other things) "all articles dealing with transgender issues" remain in force. For the avoidance of doubt, these discretionary sanctions apply to any dispute regarding the proper article title, pronoun usage, or other manner of referring to any individual known to be or self-identifying as transgender, including but not limited to Chelsea/Bradley Manning. Any sanctions imposed should be logged at the Sexology case, not this one.
 * All editors, especially those whose behavior was subject to a finding in this case, are reminded to maintain decorum and civility when engaged in discussions on Wikipedia, and to avoid commentary that demeans any other person, intentionally or not.

September

 * Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes closed 11 September 2013 (AN Notice)
 * is indefinitely banned from adding, or discussing the addition or removal of, infoboxes.
 * is admonished to behave with the level of professionalism expected of an administrator.
 * is indefinitely restricted from: adding or deleting infoboxes; restoring an infobox that has been deleted; or making more than two comments in discussing the inclusion or exclusion of an infobox on a given article. They may participate in wider policy discussions regarding infoboxes with no restriction, and include infoboxes in new articles which they create.
 * is admonished for treating Wikipedia as if it were a battleground and advised to better conduct themselves.
 * is reminded to conduct himself in a civil manner.
 * All editors are reminded to maintain decorum and civility when engaged in discussions about infoboxes, and to avoid turning discussions about a single article's infobox into a discussion about infoboxes in general.
 * The Arbitration Committee recommends that a well-publicized community discussion be held to address whether to adopt a policy or guideline addressing what factors should weigh in favor of or against including an infobox in a given article.


 * Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tea Party movement closed 5 September 2013 ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=571611461#Wikipedia:Arbitration.2FRequests.2FCase.2FTea_Party_movement_closed AN notice])
 * Pages related to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed, are placed under discretionary sanctions. This sanction supersedes the existing community sanctions.
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed to the Arbitration Committee after no less than six months have passed from the closing of this case.
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed to the Arbitration Committee after no less than six months have passed from the closing of this case.
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed to the Arbitration Committee after no less than six months have passed from the closing of this case.
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed to the Arbitration Committee after no less than six months have passed from the closing of this case.
 * is indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, anywhere on Wikipedia (subject to the ordinary exceptions).
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed to the Arbitration Committee after no less than six months have passed from the closing of this case.
 * The current community sanctions are lifted.
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed to the Arbitration Committee after no less than six months have passed from the closing of this case.
 * is topic-banned from all pages relating to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed. This topic ban will expire after six months from the date this case is closed on.
 * is indefinitely topic-banned from all pages relating to the Tea Party movement, broadly construed. This restriction may be appealed to the Arbitration Committee after no less than six months have passed from the closing of this case.
 * and are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with, or commenting on, each other anywhere on Wikipedia (subject to the ordinary exceptions).

August

 * Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kiefer.Wolfowitz and Ironholds closed 14 August 2013 ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=568425511#Wikipedia:Arbitration.2FRequests.2FCase.2FKiefer.Wolfowitz_and_Ironholds_closed AN notice])
 * For conduct unbecoming an administrator, and for bringing the project into disrepute, Ironholds is desysopped and may regain the tools via a request for adminship.
 * For his history of incivility, which includes logging out to engage in vandalism and to make personal attacks on other editors on other Wikimedia projects, Ironholds is strongly admonished.
 * For numerous violations of Wikipedia's norms and policies, Kiefer.Wolfowitz is indefinitely banned from the English Language Wikipedia. He may request reconsideration of the ban twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every six months thereafter.

July

 * Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and politics closed 26 July 2013 (AN notice)
 * Apostle12 is indefinitely prohibited from editing any page relating to "race and politics", broadly construed.
 * Apostle12 is directed to inform the Arbitration Committee if he returns to editing the English Wikipedia using any account.
 * Apostle12 (and all of his accounts, if he has created one or more others at that time) may be indefinitely blocked by any uninvolved administrator if he violates these prohibitions.

June

 * Arbitration/Requests/Case/Argentine History closed - Decided 23 June 2013 (AN notice) 
 * Cambalachero is banned indefinitely from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the history of Latin America, broadly construed across all namespaces.
 * MarshalN20 is banned indefinitely from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the history of Latin America, broadly construed across all namespaces.
 * Lecen is reminded to conduct himself in accordance with Wikipedia's behavioral guidelines.

April

 * Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sexology closed - Decided 25 April 2013 (AN notice) 
 * Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all articles dealing with transgender issues and paraphilia classification (e.g., hebephilia).
 * Jokestress and James Cantor are banned from interacting with each other, commenting on and/or commenting about each other including their professional lives, works and on-wiki activities. This applies to all namespaces, but excludes dispute resolution that explicitly relates to both parties.
 * Jokestress is indefinitely banned from the topic of human sexuality, including biographical articles.

March

 * Arbitration/Requests/Case/SchuminWeb closed - Decided 27 March 2013 (AN notice) 
 * SchuminWeb's administrative permissions are removed after a three month suspension of the case, which is therefore closed.


 * Arbitration/Requests/Case/Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) closed - Decided 13 March 2013 (AN notice) 
 * Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) is strongly admonished for creating multiple copyright violations throughout Wikipedia and failing to adhere to the project's expected standards and policies with regards to non-free content. He is warned that continued violations of this nature are likely to result in an indefinite block from editing.
 * The Committee acknowledges that Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )'s community-placed topic ban on article creations was a valid and apparently successful attempt to curb his text-based copyright violations, and further recognizes that this sanction has been violated a number of times. This topic ban will remain in place and is assumed under the Arbitration Committee's authority. After at least six months have elapsed, Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) may appeal to the Committee to have the topic ban lifted in full; in order for appeals of this remedy to be considered, he shall be required to submit evidence of substantial work on his part towards resolving the Contributor Copyright Investigations filed against him, most particularly the one focused on his text contributions.
 * Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) is indefinitely prohibited from uploading images or other media files to the English Wikipedia. The Arbitration Committee notes that media files can be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons, a project which is outside the jurisdiction of this Committee. Should Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) upload a copyright-violating image to the Wikimedia Commons and subsequently make use of that image on the English Wikipedia in any namespace, he may be subject to Arbitration Enforcement as if the image were uploaded directly to the English Wikipedia in violation of this remedy. This shall apply retroactively to all images currently uploaded by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) to the Wikimedia Commons at the time this remedy is enacted, but shall not apply retroactively to any uses on the English Wikipedia in existence at the time this case closes.
 * Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) is prohibited from linking as a reference any external site to which he has contributed. He may provide such links on the talk pages of articles, so they may be reviewed by other editors for acceptance according to applicable Wikipedia guidelines and policies; if accepted, another editor may add these links as desired.


 * Arbitration/Requests/Case/Doncram closed - Decided 12 March 2013 (AN notice) 
 * Doncram is placed under a general probation indefinitely. Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions if, despite being warned, Doncram repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any normal editorial process or any expected standards of behavior and decorum. These sanctions may include blocks, page or topic bans, instructions to refrain from a particular behavior, or any other sanction that the administrator deems appropriate. Sanctions imposed under this remedy may be appealed as if they were discretionary sanctions. Doncram may not appeal this restriction for one year and is limited to an appeal once every six months thereafter.
 * Doncram is indefinitely restricted from creating new pages, except for redirects, in article space. He may create new content pages in his user space, at Articles for Creation, in a sandbox area within a WikiProject's area, or in similar areas outside of article space. Such pages may only be moved to article space by other users after review. This restriction may be appealed to the Committee after one year.
 * For edit warring with Doncram, SarekOfVulcan is strongly admonished to behave with the level of professionalism expected of an administrator.
 * SarekOfVulcan and Doncram are indefinitely prohibited from interacting with each other (subject to the ordinary exceptions).
 * The question of how substantive the content of a stub must be before it can legitimately be introduced to the mainspace as a stand-alone article cannot be decided by the Arbitration Committee. If the project is to avoid the stub guideline becoming a recurring problem in the future, we suggest to the community that this question may need to be decided through a deliberate attempt at conducting focussed, structured discussions in the usual way.