Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Andrevan/Proposed decision

Proposed motions
Arbitrators may place proposed motions affecting the case in this section for voting. Typical motions might be to close or dismiss a case without a full decision (a reason should normally be given). Suggestions by the parties or other non-arbitrators for motions or other requests should be placed on the /Workshop page for consideration and discussion.

''Motions require an absolute majority of all active, unrecused arbitrators (same as the final decision). See Arbitration Committee/Procedures.''

Motion to dismiss
1) Because has resigned as an administrator and a bureaucrat, this case is dismissed. Andrevan may not regain either the administrator or bureaucrat permission without passing a new request for adminship and/or bureaucratship.


 * Passed 12 to 0 on 14:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Support:
 * Now that Andrevan has resigned both tools, there is really no reason to continue the case. If there are any other conduct issues they can be handled by the community. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:02, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Given his resignation, this seems appropriate. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:55, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The piece the community couldn't solve was an examination of admin/bureaucrat. That is now moot. ~ Rob 13 Talk 05:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Newyorkbrad (talk) 06:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * WormTT(talk) 06:22, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * This settles everything that actually needed a case. Opabinia regalis (talk) 07:39, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Katietalk 13:34, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Doug Weller talk 14:41, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 *  DGG ( talk ) 14:58, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 01:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Arbitrator by email – Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 17:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Arbitrator by email – Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 23:38, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments from arbitrators:

Proposed temporary injunctions
A temporary injunction is a directive from the Arbitration Committee that parties to the case, or other editors notified of the injunction, do or refrain from doing something while the case is pending. It can also be used to impose temporary sanctions (such as discretionary sanctions) or restrictions on an article or topic. Suggestions by the parties or other non-arbitrators for motions or other requests should be placed on the /Workshop page for consideration and discussion.

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support") 24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed, unless there are at least four votes to implement immediately. See Arbitration Committee/Procedures.

Template
1)

{text of proposed orders}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

=Proposed final decision=

Template
1) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
2) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
3) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
4) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
5) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
6) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
7) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
8) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
9) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
10) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
3) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
4) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
5) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
6) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
7) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
8) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
9) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
10) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
11) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
2) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
3) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
4) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
5) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
6) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
7) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
8) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
9) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
10) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
11) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
12) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
13) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Proposed enforcement

 * Comments:

Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
3) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Template
4) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:


 * Comments:

Implementation notes
''Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.''

These notes were last updated by ***ADD SIGNATURE HERE***; the last edit to this page was on by User:.


 * Proposals with voting still underway (no majority)
 * Principles: All
 * Findings: All
 * Remedies: All
 * Enforcement provisions: Pass by default


 * Proposals which have passed
 * Principles: None, yet
 * Findings: None, yet
 * Remedies: None, yet
 * Enforcement provisions: Pass by default


 * Proposals which cannot pass
 * Principles: None, yet
 * Findings: None, yet
 * Remedies: None, yet
 * Enforcement provisions: Pass by default

Vote
Important: Please ask the case clerk to author the implementation notes before initiating a motion to close, so that the final decision is clear.

''Four net "support" votes (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support") or an absolute majority are needed to close the case. The Clerks will close the case 24 hours after the fourth net support vote has been cast, unless an absolute majority of arbitrators vote to fast-track the close.''


 * Support


 * Oppose


 * Comments