Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004/Candidate statements/Endorsements/Everyking

Support

 * Endorse. I like the cut of his jib (matey). -- Cecropia | explains it all ® 07:01, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Strong support. One of our best and most prolific editors. 172 07:32, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. Hardworking editor who appreciates other hardworking editors. Very Verily  10:07, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. El_C 17:52, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Strongly support. Shorne 02:52, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. He deserves this. MattSal 02:18, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * Support - Xed 22:31, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Support.  &mdash;Lowellian (talk)   10:31, Dec 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * Strongly support. Though I hate bureaucracy, he is the only person for whom I did vote. --Rrjanbiah 07:43, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Support.  &larr;Humus sapiens&larr;Talk 10:37, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

 * Strongly Oppose. His response to three separate users opposing his reverts to an article: "i'll revert you till doomsday". Not even fit to be admin IMO. Not ArbCom material.
 * Add violating the 3rr to that as well. Reene (&#12522;&#12491;) 10:45, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. seems unsuitable to be an admin as well. edit warring not to argue a point but simply to keep his version of an article without justifying. removed from the article without reason. See Autobiography (album). --Hemanshu 15:43, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * oppose I agree his behaviour seems unsuitable for an admin as well. Read Talk:Autobiography_(album) and especially Talk:Autobiography_%28album%29/Archive1 and Votes_for_deletion/Autobiography_album_design and Votes_for_deletion/La_La for details, e.g. "Your opinion has been registered, but nothing will come of it as long as I'm watching this article." or "I'd really hate to see you do all that work for nothing." IMHO the edits that others made or suggested were entirely reasonable and nowhere near "trashing the article" as he described. Finally I would say that in most of his comments on this subject he actually shows all the classic signs of a troll! - Drstuey 23:05, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Sjc 08:02, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)