Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote/Flcelloguy

Statement
Hello! The Arbitration Committee, the final step in our dispute resolution process, is a critical and integral part of Wikipedia, and I humbly offer myself as a candidate for these elections. I’ve been here since May 2005, and was promoted to admin in August of that year. My contributions to Wikipedia (currently at 14,000 edits, although I give little value to edit counts) span a breadth of topics: from writing and contributing to the encyclopedia to helping newcomers to performing administrative tasks, I’ve always been dedicated to this wonderful project.

I’ve also had significant experience in our dispute resolution processes. I’ve been a member of the Mediation Committee, one of the key steps prior to arbitration, since September 2005 and am now one of the longest-serving active mediators. Seeing disputes firsthand and attempting to mediate the cases has provided me with invaluable experience, and will allow me to serve as Arbitrator more efficiently and with more judgment. I’ve also followed the activities of the Arbitration Committee closely, providing evidence in several cases. I also wrote the entire series about the Arbitration Committee and the elections for the Wikipedia Signpost’s series on the January 2006 ArbCom elections; articles covered everything from the history of the ArbCom, criticism of the committee, reform attempts, to duties and requirements of ArbCom members. During the series I also interviewed most of the ArbCom members. Conducting these interviews, along with researching and writing the series, has provided me with a keen and unique perspective about the ArbCom.

My experience is not limited to dispute resolution, though. I’ve nominated several featured articles and pictures, and created and improved countless others. I’ve also served the community in other capacities: I’ve written nearly 100 articles for the Signpost since August 2005, am on the OTRS team, am a Meta admin, and also am on the Communication Committee’s Internal Subcommittee, responsible for being a liaison for the community to the Foundation and vice versa. I’ve always been of the community, and will always be for the community.

My platform is simple: I will always listen closely to everyone, carefully consider all the options, and do whatever is best for the encyclopedia. Ultimately, the duty of the ArbCom is to improve the encyclopedia, and I will always keep that priority first.

It has been a great honor and privilege serving the community, and I look forward to continuing to serve.

Flcelloguy (A note? ) 22:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Questions

Support

 * 1) Support Jd2718 00:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) --Spangineerws (háblame)  00:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) -- Majorly  00:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Nufy8 00:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Ral315 (talk) (my votes) 00:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 00:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) maclean 00:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) bainer (talk) 00:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Coredesat  00:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * BhaiSaab talk 00:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * This user is banned. --Srikeit 08:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Hello32020 00:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Strong Support. Tito xd (?!?) 00:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Jaranda wat's sup 01:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Thatcher131 01:15, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 01:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) KPbIC 02:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) pschemp | talk 02:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 9)  ßott  e  siηi  (talk) 02:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) —Mi ra  02:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Support, although it will be sad to lose you from MedCom. ^ demon [omg plz] 02:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Rebecca 03:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Warofdreams talk 03:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) Support Flcelloguy works hard as co-organizer of edit counter; good sense of humor (remember story - dyslexic brother thought user name was Fellatio guy)--Hokeman 03:51, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Support Fine judgment; excellent, well-rounded wiki-career. Xoloz 04:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) Serpent&#39;s Choice 04:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) THB 04:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) Ter e nce Ong 04:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) —AySz88\^ - ^  04:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 20) Peta 04:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 21) Support. Peace. --Nielswik(talk) 04:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 22) Dylan Lake (t·c) 05:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 23) Support. alteripse 05:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 24) Srikeit 05:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 25) Support Buck  ets  ofg  05:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 26) ATren 05:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 27) User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 05:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 28) semper fi —  Moe  05:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 29) Support --Riley 06:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 30) Without reservation.  Joe 06:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 31) GizzaChat  &#169; 06:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 32) Aminz 06:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 33) Aksi_great (talk) 07:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 34) Tawker 07:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 35) Support -- Mytwocents 07:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 36) Support. Record of sound judgement. Good for the Arbcom duties. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 37) Another Wikipedian 07:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Support excellent candidate! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alkivar (talk • contribs) 07:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Double vote ? Sandy (Talk) 17:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Support Davewild 08:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Support Dr Debug (Talk) 08:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) cj | talk 09:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Weakly. – Chacor 09:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) AmiDaniel (talk) 10:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) --Sugaar 10:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) --MariusM 12:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) -- May the Force be with you!  Shr e shth91 12:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Support Charles Matthews 12:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Support. Good work on the  Freestylefrappe case. &mdash;Viriditas | Talk 12:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Support. Crum375 13:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 12)  Shyam  ( T / C ) 13:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) --Mcginnly | Natter 13:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) Christopher Parham (talk) 13:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Support --CBD 13:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) Support Andrew Lenahan - St<FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT> 14:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) Support (based on answers to my questions) Anomo 14:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) --<font color="#CD2626">§hanel  14:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) Support -- MightyWarrior 15:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 20) *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 15:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 21) Support ~ Amalas   rawr =^_^=  16:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 22) ➨  ЯEDVERS  16:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 23) Support. Flcelloguy is very dedicated to Wikipedia, extremely attentive to what others have to say, and he always tries to work towards consensus. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 24) good work on Medcab... i'd trust flcelloguy to judge whats best for wiki.  <font color="#FA8605">ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 16:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 25) Support -- need more like him. <font color="#0082B8">=Nichalp  <font color="#0082B8">«Talk»=  17:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 26) Support --mh 17:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 27) --Conti|&#9993; 17:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 28) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 18:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 29) The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 30) Support, though please cut the unnecessary words in your statement. Being "humble" never sounds quite right typed, in my opinion. Regards, &mdash;Cel es tianpower háblame 20:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 31) Support --Duke of Duchess Street 20:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 32) Support --Zleitzen 21:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 33) Support - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 34) Support - Nihiltres 23:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 35) Support --CComMack (t–c) 23:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 36) Probably the easiest support vote I've ever cast. Absolutely qualified. <font color="#DF0001">Matt Yeager  <font size="3" color="#B46611">♫  <font color="#00AA88">(<font color="#00AA88">Talk? ) 23:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 37) Gurch 23:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 38) Indeed. --Alf <sup style="color:green;">melmac  23:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 39) Support RFerreira 23:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 40) Michael Snow 23:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 41) Support --Howrealisreal 23:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 42) Support. JYolkowski // talk 00:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 43) Support for a candidate whose credentials, experience, and dedication should make him a fine arbitrator. Newyorkbrad 01:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 44) Support --Yarnalgo 01:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 45) Support TSO1D 01:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 46) Support, though I hate to wish ArbCom on anyone. --humblefool&reg; 02:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 47) Support —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-05 02:09Z 
 * 48) Support Yamaguchi先生 02:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 49) Support. Intelligent decision maker. Thanks for the welcome years ago! <b style="color:#000000;">Royal</b><b style="color:#FFCC00;">broil</b>T : C 02:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 50) Support ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 51) riana_dzasta 03:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 52) -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 03:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 53) Support —JeremyA 03:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 54) Support Everything looks good, deserved 100%. // I c e d K o l a  ( Contribs ) 04:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 55) Support --hydnjo talk 04:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 56) Strong support – Will make an excellent arbiter. – ClockworkSoul 07:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 57) Snowball support' - Obviously a strong candidate. --Wo o ty Woot? contribs 07:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 58) Support--ragesoss 09:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 59) Support ×Meegs 10:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 60) Support --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 11:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 61) Support ST47 Talk 11:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 62) Support Jpeob 11:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 63) Support. —Serein 11:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 64) robchurch | talk 12:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 65) -- Nataly a 12:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 66) Jon Harald Søby 12:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 67) &mdash; Nightst  a  llion  (?) 13:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 68) Support. flowersofnight (talk) 14:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 69) Support. --Muchness 15:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 70) Support Excellent "mission statement" -Drdisque 15:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 71) Support.--Isotope23 15:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 72) Support. - Taxman Talk 15:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 73) Strong Support - While I've "seen the name around", my first experience with him was following the Board elections on Requests for comments/Board Election 2006. From what I saw there, I have little doubt that Flcelloguy will be a positive, thoughtful, and truly helpful member of the Arbitration committee. - jc37 16:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 74) Support. Impressive breadth of experience, from editing to administration and serving on the Mediation Committee. &mdash;Goh wz 18:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 75) Support.--Scimitar 19:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 76) Support – Quadell (talk) (random) 19:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 77) Support. --Fang Aili talk 19:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 78) Support  --Connel MacKenzie -  wikt 20:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 79) Don't burn yourself out. Andre (talk) 22:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 80) Support  Nish kid 64  01:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 81) Support --Makgraf 03:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 82) Support extensively experienced.-- danntm T C 04:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 83) Support. —Lantoka ( talk 04:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 84) -- Run<font color="#339900">e  Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; 04:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 85) Support -- EdJohnston 04:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 86) Max<font size="+1">S em 09:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 87) Kusma (討論) 13:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 88) Support. --Merlinme 13:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 89) Support per bandwagon. Besides, a very impressive candidate. Metamagician3000 13:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 90) Support -- Schnee (cheeks clone) 13:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 91) Support. Blank<font color="#F88017">Verse 15:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 92) Support Fred Bauder 15:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 93) Support Spartaz 17:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 94) Support Superb candidate with tons of mediation experience ▪◦▪ ≡Ѕirex98≡   20:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 95) Support Alexj2002 21:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 96) Support EdwinHJ | Talk 21:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 97) Support. Good editor, lots of experience. --Danaman5 21:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 98) &there4; here&hellip;&spades; 21:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 99) Convincing amount of work and activities Okino 23:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 100) In my opinion, the best neutral cadidate out here! -- Kim van der Linde at venus 01:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 101) Well, duh. Daveydw ee b ( chat/review! ) 01:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 102) Support.  All of my observations of this user's behavior have been positive. --Elonka 06:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 103) Support. One of the good guys. 06:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC) gK
 * 104) Support. Must TC 11:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 105) Support he would be excellent in this role. James086Talk 11:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 106) Support. -- Cactus.man  &#9997;  12:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 107) Chris 14:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 108) Support definitely. Deb 17:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 109) --<font color="#f4a460 ">Birgitte§β ʈ  <font color="#778899">Talk  17:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 110) Support ... Kenosis 18:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 111) Mackensen (talk) 19:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 112) Support Pascal.Tesson 22:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 113) Support Cpuwhiz11 23:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 114) Support Voted against me last election. Don't know why. Don't care. Excellent candidate. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:27, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 115) - crz crztalk 00:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 116) AdelaMae (talk - contribs) 01:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 117) Support - Gnetwerker 07:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 118) Support - JoeSmack Talk 08:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 119) Support -- Randall Bart 08:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 120) Support Experienced, thorough, no dirty laundry Alan.ca 10:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 121) Support Dragomiloff 13:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 122) appears to have great track record.-- Andeh 13:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 123) Support Kristod (talk)  14:35, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 124) Support D  dc  c  15:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 125) BanyanTree 18:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 126) Support Demonstrates experience and an interest in dispute resolution. Alan Pascoe 23:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 127) Support - Experienced, energetic. Definitely one of the better candidates. Torinir ( Ding my phone  My support calls   E-Support Options  ) 23:46, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 128) Support E104421 02:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 129) Shagmaestro 11:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 130) Support. enochlau (talk) 12:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 131) Support. --- Deville (Talk) 19:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 132) Support--<font color="Green">E <font color="Blue">va  <font color="Red">b <font color="Red">d  22:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 133) Support.  Extraordinary candidate. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 00:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 134) Support. <font style="background: black" face="Courier" color="#FFFFFF"> Grue  09:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 135) Support - Robmods 13:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 136) M a rtinp23 15:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 137) Pile-on support Stifle (talk) 15:28, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 138) at the risk of joining the bandwagon, Support. FiggyBee 18:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 139) Tra (Talk) 22:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 140) Support Brian | (Talk) 22:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 141) Support. I looked for a reason to oppose and couldn't find one. I looked really hard. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 23:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 142) Support. A decent and kind editor. -- Thesocialistesq/M.Lesocialiste 23:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 143) Jwrosenzweig 00:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 144)  Donald Albury  01:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 145) Support. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  05:43, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 146) Support. He knows what he's doing. --TinMan 06:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 147) Support Pete.Hurd 06:39, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 148) Support &mdash;Perceval 06:43, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 149) Delta Tango • Talk 07:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 150) Support, obviously. Vizjim 13:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 151) Support. -- Gphoto talk  14:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 152) Support. &mdash;Theo  (Talk) 15:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 153) I defer to the masses at this point. --<font color="#ff66ff">Cyde Weys  19:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 154) Support. A.M.962 19:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 155) Support. -- Capsgm2002 21:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 156) Support.  bibliomaniac 1  5  01:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 157) support Krupo 04:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 158) Merovingian ※ Talk 07:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 159) Support -- Longhair\talk 08:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 160) Support and, I guess, congratulations. <FONT STYLE="verdana" COLOR="#000000">Dei</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF3300">zio</FONT> talk 15:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 161) Support. Jonathunder 16:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 162) Support. revised vote comment, mistook for one better known to me. Both worthy of the task. //<B>Fra</B> nkB  21:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 163) Support GRBerry 23:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 164) Sarah Ewart 23:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 165) Saravask 02:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 166) Support. Dedicated to the project, no apparent civility issues, simple platform. Works for me.  Firsfron of Ronchester  04:27, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 167) Support Yes, hell yes! Oskar 19:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 168) Support Wetman 23:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 169) Support Lost Kiwi (talk)00:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 170) Neutralitytalk 00:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 171) Support the cello guy, and wish you good luck. - <font color="#004161">Introvert • <font color="#004161">~  03:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 172) Support 210<font color="#0000C0" face="Comic Sans MS">physicq  (<font color="#0000C0">c ) 04:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 173)  r speer  / ɹəəds ɹ  10:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 174) Support. the wub "?!"  12:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 175) Guettarda 15:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 176) Support -- what more can I say? -- <font color="Blue">Chris Lester <font color="Blue">talk  18:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 177) Support. Hall Monitor 18:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 178) Support Thanks for your past and future contributions. \/\/slack  ( talk ) 23:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 179) Support, great amount of experience in all the right places. All answers were satisfactory. <font color="Green">Voretus <font color="Purple">talk 15:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 180) Support, in spite of his recent oppose vote. :) Bastiq ▼ e demandez 17:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 181) Support. --Túrelio 22:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 182) Support  Sophia  22:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 183) Support. RyanG e rbil10 (Упражнение В!) 23:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 184) Support. Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 185) Support.. Note: This page is 30 kilobytes long, good luck, Flcelloguy. A music lover can't be bad. -- DLL .. T 11:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 186) Support - Objective and trustworthy. Ian ¹³  /t  12:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 187) Support You are destined for greatness (well, you already are, but, you're destined for more). Make that 31 kilobytes ;-) --<font face="Jokewood"> K yo cat  ¿Quíeres hablar? 16:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 188) —Centrx→talk &bull; 22:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 189) Strong Support, exactly what this user should be doing. &mdash;Xyrael / 22:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 190) Strong Support, this fella always took to FAC process seriously. I'm sure he'll be the same on the Arbitration committee. --Jayzel 00:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 191) Support easy one to decide Krich (talk) 03:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 192) Support --WinHunter (talk) 04:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 193) Support (Good overall impression. I had planned to do some more research today which was prevented by an emergency in our area.) 04:39, 17 December 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SebastianHelm (talk • contribs).
 * 194) Samir धर्म 08:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 195) Derex 10:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 196) Support NoSeptember  14:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 197) Support --Charlesknight 14:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 198) Support, well rounded, has the desire and ability to put in what this would take. — <font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"> xaosflux  <font color="#00FF00">Talk 16:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 199) Support, Huldra 17:48, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 200) Support, good judgement and experience. Gimmetrow 20:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 201) Support. —Locke Cole • t • c 21:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 202) Support 172 | Talk 21:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 203) Excellent work. theProject 22:58, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 204) Support. I'd be very happy to see this editor on the ArbCom. -Will Beback · † · 23:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 205) Support - my vote comments. Carcharoth 23:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 206) Support On character. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 23:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Oppose
- crz crztalk 00:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose --Van helsing 09:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


 * 1) Oppose, there seems pressure to jump on the bandwagon to support, but I'm not impressed by this candidate. HGB 07:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * To be honest all the candidates that I've looked at answer questions similarly. Which doesn't really surprise me, the only things that ideal for the candidate is to have good intentions and an open mind other then that it's pretty hard to screw this up.Mike92591 20:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose, too many support votes. Guettarda 15:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose cadidate seems to miss the nuances associated with NPOV, in particular, that in science-related articles NPOV can be gamed to create a less-reliable encyclopedia. Answer to the question regarding SPOV took an article-by-article stance on the subject rather than addressing the more particular question of whether science-related articles should be tied to the scientific consensus on the matter. Such an oversight is a feature that concerns me for someone seeking to be an arbitrator. --ScienceApologist 16:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)