Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Candidate statements/FT2

FT2

 * {| width="70%" style="border:darkgrey solid 1px;font-size:90%"


 * Registered: July 2004;
 * Admin: January 2007 (prior rfa withdrawn at 80%, June 2006);
 * OTRS: September 2007;
 * Real life info: 40 ± 2 years old. Working with secure, sensitive information (VP level); and mentoring;(disclosure info)
 * Wiki contribution areas: See user page.
 * }
 * }


 * Hi. I'm User:FT2. I've been quietly working on our more difficult cases and helping other administrators and users  since 2004/05:


 * I've written around 100 substantive articles (list), and authored the stable wordings/structure of many of our core policy and project pages (list).


 * I undertook my first full mediation case and presented my first substantial arbcom evidence  in November 2004, my first full arbcom case in December 2004, followed by involvement in another in January 2005, and a further two warriors later that year, with repeated experience since. Since 2004 and moreso since adminship, I've consistently managed difficult disputes, more virulent warriors, closure of heated or difficult AFDs, further arbcom cases, and problems needing exceptional insight and communication. Throughout, I've continued participating regularly at arbcom.


 * In this arena, I've not only gained respect, but also been commended for some of the best decisions and dispute resolutions in the history of the project: - "possibly the wordiest, best thought through AFD close in the history of the project", and "probably the most comprehensive and balanced dispute resolution I've ever read on Wikipedia" . Even in heated disputes, I am routinely considered fair ... even by those I've declined , who initially disagreed -- and by more than one I've warned or blocked.


 * Behind the scenes, I also do a lot of "second opinion" and escalation/resolution work, in-depth allegation/dispute checking, and drafting analyses and dispute summaries that gain respect even in tough cases . I'm able to say 'no' and explain the reasons, non-provokable , fair to difficult editors, and evidence-centered in presenting concerns about administrator and arbcom decisions when necessary . I spot important privacy/security issues others might miss , and reconsider my stance if needed.


 * For further details, please ask.


 * Arbcom is our way to endorse a panel of trusted and experienced users, to decide our most divisive or exceptional matters. The Committee must therefore 1/ be responsive (major cases often deteriorate rapidly), 2/ earn exceptional respect for its decisions (unlike all other communal decisions, the invitation "anyone can edit" does not apply), 3/ act transparently and with clarity, and 4/ be answerable to the community, not the other way round.


 * As an administrator, I have been community focussed and a problem-solver, accessible and supportive. As an arbitrator (if appointed) I give my commitment to absolute integrity; to be accountable; to be approachable; and to be fair, insightful and effective.


 * FT2 (Talk 05:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Questions for the candidate
 * Support or Oppose this candidate
 * Support or Oppose this candidate


 * I was too late (Bad internet connection) but I enthusiastically support this candidate. --Blue Tie (talk) 00:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)