Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/Alexia Death

Please Note: Extended comments may be moved to the talk page.

Support

 * 1) --U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 01:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Strong support for an intelligent and perceptive candidate that telepathy is not enough when it comes to deliberations.  W. Frank talk ✉  13:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Sure. Acalamari 21:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --Docg 00:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Support.Biophys 14:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Moral support. You do have some very good ideas and intelligent answers to the questions, and I hope you stick around and turn things around for the better. However, I do tend to agree with Seraphimblade (#56) below. Grand  master  ka  02:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Support I agree with Grandmasterka, you have intelligent answers for questions and can well do the job of arbcom. pruthvi (talk) 18:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support I don't care if people say you're too new. We need more people in ArbCom who actually think creatively and constructively rather than joining the country club. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 18:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Support. Dealing with the root of the issues is essential. --Sugaar (talk) 00:58, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Part of the problem rather than the solution I think. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 00:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  spryde  |  talk  00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  B LACK K ITE  00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose. Massive history of block-shopping at ANI and IRC against content opponents alone is more than enough. --Irpen 00:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Icestorm815 00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Tim Q. Wells 00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Chaz Beckett 00:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Oppose Awfully new. Has experienced WP largely as a disputant. (my fuller vote explanations) -- Jd2718 00:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Too new This is a Secret account 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Nufy8 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Nishkid64 (talk) 00:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Hell no.   ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Not enough experience.  Snowolf  How can I help? 00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 15)  — master sonT - C 00:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) – Gurch (talk) 00:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) east. 718 at 00:34, December 3, 2007
 * 18)  Mr.  Z- man  00:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) - auburn pilot   talk  00:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) No. - Jehochman  Talk 00:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) Nick 00:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) Prolog 00:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 23) ~ Riana ⁂  00:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) —   iride  scent  00:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 25) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose -- Avi 01:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Oppose  Miranda  01:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 27) Core desat  01:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 28)  M2Ys4U ( talk ) 01:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 29) Cryptic 01:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 30) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] Alex ' fus ' co5  02:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 31) Stephen 02:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 32) Mike H. Celebrating three years of being hotter than Paris 02:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 33) Too new.Zocky | picture popups 02:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 34) Too new. Rebecca 02:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 35) Oppose Thatcher131 02:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 36)  Hús  ö  nd 02:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 37) Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 02:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 38)  M er cury    03:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 39) Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 40) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] KTC 03:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 41) Sorry. Videmus Omnia  Talk  03:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 42) Oppose -Dureo 03:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 43) Oppose. Mbisanz 03:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 44) --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - &lt;*&gt; 04:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 45) JayHenry 04:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 46) —  xaosflux  Talk 04:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 47)  Spebi  04:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 48) RyanGerbil10 (Говорить!) 05:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 49)  ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 05:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 50)  T M F Let's Go Mets - Stats 06:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 51) Sjakkalle  (Check!)  06:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 52) - Crockspot 07:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 53) Davewild 08:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 54) Sorry. —  Nearly Headless Nick   {C}  08:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 55) Arbitrators should not have rulings against them. DrKiernan 08:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 56) By the time you're at ArbCom, you've already been told what's unacceptable, and chosen to ignore it over and over. Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 57) Nope. --Folantin 09:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 58) Shem(talk) 09:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 59) --Mcginnly | Natter 09:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 60) I'm having a hard time assuming good faith in this nomination. All participants in ethnic feuds have no chance to receive my support. Max S em(Han shot first!) 10:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 61) Oppose: A partisan who has not shown the ability to rise above the fray, and rising above one's own feelings is the single qualification for ArbCom.  Geogre 10:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 62) Oppose John Vandenberg 11:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 63) I consider adminship a basic requirement to run for ArbCom. Stifle (talk) 11:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 64) Adminship is not a basic requirement of mine but experience is and 6 months is far too less to be judged on..maybe the next elections..-- Cometstyles 12:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 65) Oppose, though note that the statement includes some painfully accurate observations. Splash - tk 12:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 66) Lack of experience, recent inactivity and behavioural concerns. the wub "?!"  13:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 67) Oppose Xoloz 13:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 68) Oppose on experience. Sarah 14:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC) Addit: having read this, if there "are more rewarding projects calling out to [you]" I strongly recommend withdrawing and not wasting our or your own time. Sarah 14:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 69) Oppose. Previous sanctions by Arbcom pretty much rule out serving on the Committee. — Gavia immer (talk) 16:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 70) Ral315 — (Voting) 16:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Avruch Talk 17:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Avruch does not have suffrage --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs (st47) 22:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) - Philippe &#124; Talk 18:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Pi 18:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC) Unfortunately i think that with only 6 months of editing and no adminship i am concerned about your experience, but maybe in the future :)
 * 3) Oppose Ripberger 20:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 21:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose - I don't know, but I'm just not convinced you really have the necessary experience and all that. Sorry. -- Schneelocke 21:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose as per Schneelocke, and most of the others on this list.  Mindraker 21:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) —Ruud 22:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose. Experience. Kaldari 22:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) --Malcolmxl5 22:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Oppose. Unfamiliar with this candidate. --Pleasantville 22:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Oppose Only six months of experience. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 22:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Oppose FlowerpotmaN &middot;(t) 23:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Oppose Shot info 23:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Too new, may be great sometime in the future. WjBscribe 23:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) Oppose Last I heard from candidate was "There are more rewarding projects calling out to me and my time is limited". While I appreciate openness, I need to see some willingness to commitment. Moreover, I'm somewhat miffed that the candidate couldn't make eir mind up before hundreds of people are forced to make an informed decision. &mdash; Sebastian 00:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) Oppose. Sorry, much too new ×Meegs 01:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) Oppose, not enough experience -- Imperator3733 01:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) oppose inexperienced.  Me rk i n s m um  02:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) Greg Jones II 02:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) Enuja  (talk) 03:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) CO GDEN  03:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) Oppose. Jonathunder 04:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 23) Dekimasuよ!  05:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) Oppose due to three criteria of mine: not an admin; not experienced enough; have negative editorial experience with her Alex Bakharev 07:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 25)  DarkFalls  talk 07:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) Heart probably in the right place (that is to say, I'm certain the user wants to be an arbitrator for the right reasons rather than the wrong ones), but a combination of inexperience and the ArbCom ruling against her is concerning enough to oppose. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * OpposeArbCom ruling  Travtim (Talk) 15:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC) (ineligible to vote Tim! 19:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC))
 * 1) oppose Pete.Hurd 18:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) You do have arbcom experience. Unfortunately it's the wrong kind of experience. Wizardman  18:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Nope Xdenizen (talk) 23:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Michael Snow (talk) 23:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose. Viriditas 02:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Weakly opposing all but the 10 candidates I'd explicitly like to see on Arbcom to double the power of my vote. -- M P er el 04:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Alexia Death has engaged in a variety of disruptive behavior, including sustained edit-warring as well as incivility, personal attacks, and assumptions of bad faith Sasha Callahan 04:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) I must say that a brief examination of the candidate and of her answers to (certain, at least, of) the questions leave me a good bit less inclined to oppose than first I was when I saw Alexia on the candidate list, but there remain some significant concerns.  Joe 05:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Van Tucky  talk 05:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Agree with DrKiernan. Dihydrogen Monoxide  ♫ 06:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Oppose Professor marginalia (talk) 07:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Oppose. Wetman (talk) 08:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Oppose padraig
 * 14) Oppose Kyaa the Catlord (talk) 11:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) Oppose docboat (talk) 14:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) Mailer Diablo (talk) 14:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) Oppose The Islander 15:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose Skyclown
 * Vote indented, user do not have suffrage.  Snowolf How can I help? 16:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) GRBerry 17:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Sweetfirsttouch (talk) 17:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Lack of a detailed answer to NPOV/SPOV question, as well as concerns raised above. Skinwalker (talk) 18:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose as she has already adopted the current ArbCom's pace of work in answering the questions asked of her.  Paul Beardsell (talk) 22:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose - The arbcom is evil, so any candidate who chooses to participate in it in any manner shows poor judgment. Gentgeen (talk) 03:27, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose. Dreadstar  †  04:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose failed to answer several questions, including one very important to me. SashaNein (talk) 04:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose, just too new for this kind of thing. Homestarmy (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Changing my vote to Oppose per concerns of block shopping. Sorry :-( Nobody of Consequence (talk) 18:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Law Lord (talk) 22:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redstarsldr (talk) 02:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC) To much personal ideas about this issue.
 * User does not have suffrage Nick (talk) 02:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose, per Requests for arbitration/Digwuren. Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 07:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)