Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/Mercury

Please Note: Comments longer than two short sentences will be moved to the talk page.

Support

 * 1) Fred Bauder 01:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Like those below, I oppose the Durova "witch hunts" and the use of admin tools during the dispute was uncalled for. However, no one deserves a drubbing like this, so I'm giving a Moral support.  Firsfron of Ronchester  03:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Firs ~ Riana ⁂  04:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Nishkid64 (talk) 00:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) AniMate  00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Tim Q. Wells 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Nothing personal, I just do not think he is ready.  spryde  |  talk  00:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Lack of experience with this, shown by the recent Kmweber case This is a Secret account 00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Qst  00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose. Bad faith and disruption on this and related pages. Bishonen | talk 00:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC).
 * 9) Prolog 00:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Actions and demeanor during the Durova issue left much to be desired. RxS 00:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) (ec*3) Not ready yet. -- Jonathan ( T • @ • C ) 00:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Chaz Beckett 00:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Because of recent misuse of admin tools during the Durova incident including semi-protection of the ANI page. Cla68 00:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) --U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 00:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) Oppose. Part of the problem rather than a solution of the issue of undercarpet games. --Irpen 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) W.marsh 00:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]]  Alex ' fus ' co5  02:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs (st47) 00:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) Oppose (my vote explanations) -- Jd2718 00:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) Nufy8 00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) Angus McLellan  (Talk) 00:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) --Duk 00:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 23) Full disclosure: I did not support the Durova witchhunt, but condemned her actions instead. However, Durova did not need an apologist. — Kurykh  00:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) east. 718 at 00:35, December 3, 2007
 * 25) – Gurch (talk) 00:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) Per involvement in the durova witchhunts.   ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 00:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 27)  B LACK K ITE  00:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 28) - auburn pilot   talk  00:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 29) Have concerns.  Grace notes T § 00:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 30) Supported an admin over an innocent victim of their harassment. No. •  Lawrence Cohen  00:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 31) Per editors above regarding Durova witchhunts. Travb (talk) 00:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 32) Oppose —  iride  scent  01:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 33) oppose Extended comments moved to talk page.  Me rk i n s m um  01:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 34) absolutely not.—Random832 01:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 35) GRBerry 01:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 36) Way too much of a blind follower :/ -- krimpet ⟲  01:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 37) Oppose for lots of reasons, e.g. saying "don't troll" to another valued contributor in a good-faith discussion. --Alecmconroy 01:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 38) He protected an AN/I subpage that criticized one of his friends, which of course made the dispute even worse. Kla’quot (talk | contribs) 01:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 39) Recent, obviously inappropriate use of tools. Christopher Parham (talk) 01:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 40) Per above.  Miranda  01:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 41) Core desat 01:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 42) DGG (talk) 02:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 43) Not impressed by answers to questions. -- Rodhullandemu  (please reply here - contribs) 02:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 44) Especially in these situations, clinging to Durova is like clinging to a sinking ship, and it shows in this vote. Mike H. Celebrating three years of being hotter than Paris 02:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 45) Too new, plus poor judgement. Zocky | picture popups 02:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 46) Cryptic 02:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 47) Rebecca 02:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 48) Strongly per Kla’quot. Dihydrogen Monoxide  ♫ 02:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 49) Joe 02:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 50) Sorry, but absolutely not.  — bbatsell   ¿?   ✍  02:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 51) Bob Mellish 03:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 52) Oppose. --InkSplotch 03:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 53)  Hús  ö   nd  03:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 54) -- Cactus.man   &#9997;  03:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 55) GlassCobra 03:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No, sorry. Videmus Omnia Talk  03:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) JayHenry 03:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose Ealdgyth | Talk 03:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose No thanks -Dureo 04:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Viridae Talk  04:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose - perhaps at another time.  Not now. -- Robster2001 04:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Everyking 04:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) —  xaosflux  Talk 04:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Oppose. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 04:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) sNkrSnee |  ¿qué?  04:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Oppose - despicable behavior at the recent Durova ArbCom case. Isarig 04:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)