Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/Ryan Postlethwaite


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.  No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Please Note: Extended comments may be moved to the talk page.

Support

 * 1) Kurykh  00:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) This is a Secret account 00:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Damn! I'm third!&mdash;  trey  (wiki) 00:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  Kwsn   (Ni!)  00:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  Daniel  00:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Qst 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Rschen7754 (T C) 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Icestorm815 00:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) &mdash; Coren (talk) 00:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Woodym555 00:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) AniMate  00:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 12)  B LACK K ITE  00:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Kei lana  00:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Support--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) As an observer of your excellent work, without hesitation. Monsieurdl 00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 16)  Cbrown1023    talk   00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) Anthøny  00:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) -- (Review Me) R Parlate Contribs@ 00:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) Kittybrewster  &#9742;  00:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) – Gurch (talk) 00:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) From what I've seen, support. - Rjd0060 00:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) Ariel ♥ Gold  00:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 23) good judgement, etc, support.—Random832 00:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) I am concerned about the statement in Durova's RFC, but do not see this as problematic.  Grace notes T § 00:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 25) Good editor, will make good arbitrator Mbisanz 00:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) —  Rlevse  •  Talk  • 00:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 27) --Stephen 00:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 28) - auburn pilot  talk  00:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 29) Captain  <font color="red" face="Papyrus">panda  01:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 30)  sh  &curren;  y  01:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 31) Stardust8212 01:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 32)  bibliomaniac 1  5  02:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 33) --Charitwo talk 02:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 34) <font color="Blue">Alex '<font color="Red">fus '<font color="Green">co5  02:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 35) B 02:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 36) <font color="#4169E1">W<font color="#191970">ODU P  02:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 37) Yes. --<font color="7F007F">Rodhullandemu  (please reply here - contribs) 02:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 38) &lt;<tt> DREAMAFTER </tt>&gt; &lt; TALK &gt; 02:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 39) I strongly support this nomination: Ryan has been an excellent admin, and I believe he will do great as an arbitrator. Acalamari 02:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 40) - Jehochman  Talk 03:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 41) I'd built up a generally poor impression of Ryan, so was very pleasantly surprised by his cogent answers to questioning. &mdash;Cryptic 03:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 42) · <font face="Times New Roman">AndonicO Talk 03:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 43) Absolutely. GlassCobra 03:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 44) Aboutmovies 03:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 45) <font style="color: #082567">Hús  ö <font style="color: #082567">nd  03:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 46) Videmus Omnia  Talk  03:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 47) Strong Support -- Cobi(t 04:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 48) Pharaoh of the Wizards 04:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 49)  <font color="Black">J- <font color="Red">ſtan  TalkContribs 04:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 50)  Spebi  06:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 51) <font color="#CC0018">T <font color="#0000C0">M F Let's Go Mets - Stats 06:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 52) Support -- R OGER D AVIES   talk 06:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 53) a very reasonable person. --Jack Merridew 06:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 54) Reasonable. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 07:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 55) - Crockspot 07:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 56) <font color="BA55D3">Lara <font color="00CED1">❤ <font color="FF1493">Love  08:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 57)  Jmlk  1  7  08:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 58) Bah.."Humans make mistakes" and if we don't, then we aren't humans and this elections is a farce..-- Cometstyles 10:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 59) -- lucasbfr talk 11:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 60) --Vassyana 11:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 61) Support Committed user. PeaceNT 14:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 62) Jeffpw 15:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 63) Possesses the qualities necessary to fulfil this position. Orderinchaos 15:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 64) Mango juice talk 15:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 65) [[Image:Yes check.svg|15px]] Support Porcupine (prickle me! · contribs · status) 16:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 66) RFARB is the last step in dispute resolution, candidate has lots of dispute resolution experience which is important for this role. Decisions and opinions certainly not excessively off-track, in my opinion. GDonato (talk) 16:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 67) Opposers are too quick to generalise. &mdash; Rudget contributions 17:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 68) --MONGO 17:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 69) Support - Absolutely. - Philippe &#124; Talk 18:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 70) Davewild 19:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 71) Support - One of the least bad candidates. I often disagree with him, but he is generally civil and tactful and has the interests of Wikipedia at heart. WaltonOne 19:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 72) Strong Support Friendly user who is qualified to run for ArbCom. NHRHS2010  talk  20:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 73) Oldelpaso 20:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 74) Smokizzy (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 75) Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 20:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 76) --Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 21:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 77) Support - sure, sounds good. -- Schneelocke 22:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 78) WjBscribe 23:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 79) Support. <font face="Comic Sans"> Corvus cornix  talk  23:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 80) Nice, simple statement with several links to experience. Statement at Durova's RfC was well intended, and I'm sure the candidate lerned from the experience. &mdash; Sebastian 23:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 81) Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 00:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 82) Support. Thanks, SqueakBox 00:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 83) βcommand 01:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 84) Support Greg Jones II 02:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 85) @pple complain 03:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 86) --<font face="Futura">A. B. (talk) 03:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 87) Support I don't always agree with Ryan, but I respect his dedication to the project. Raymond Arritt 04:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 88) Support --DHeyward 06:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 89) Support JPG-GR 06:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 90) — Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 06:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose per his comment at Durova's RfC. His views expressed at Miskin ArbCom are similarly alarming. --Irpen 00:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * convenience link. —Random832 00:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) weak oppose --W.marsh 00:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Nishkid64 (talk) 00:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) <small style="background:#fff;border:#ff8c00 1px solid;color:#000;padding:0px 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap">east<big style="color:#090">. 718 at 00:29, December 3, 2007
 * 4) Extremely regretful oppose. Good admin, but I don't think he's quite right for ArbCom, at least not yet. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Nufy8 00:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Not yet. futurebird 00:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Doesn't appear to understand the seriousness and gravity of Durova's recent actions and the mind-set that led to them . Cla68 00:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Strong oppose as per Durova comments. Travb (talk) 00:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Oppose per durova RFC comments.  <font color="#FA8605">ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 00:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Oppose, sorry. Tim Q. Wells 00:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) <font face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica"><font color="#2A8B31">Ρх₥α 00:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Ryan's a good admin but his opinions about controversial issues sometimes puzzle me. Chick Bowen 01:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Weak oppose - IMO Ryan's pretty together - and anyone WR hates that much can't be all bad - but seems to make a few too many weird calls.<font face="Trebuchet MS"> — <font color="#E45E05">iride <font color="#C1118C">scent  01:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Not at this time.  R. Baley 01:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) GRBerry 01:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) Not yet, sorry.  Miranda  01:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 17)  SQL <sup style="color:#999">Query me!  01:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) Oppose, not yet. --Core<font color="#457541">desat 02:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) Mike H. Celebrating three years of being hotter than Paris 02:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) Hardworking and productive, but I don't believe he is ready for a leadership role. Christopher Parham (talk) 02:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) Too new. Zocky | picture popups 02:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) Oppose Thatcher131 02:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 23)  krimpet  ⟲  02:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) Weak oppose. Maybe next year. Rebecca 02:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 25) Oppose (my fuller vote explanations) -- Jd2718 02:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) Painfully. Ryan, you have my strongest support, but that Durova thing was just appalling in my eyes.  Sorry mate, <font color=#12A434>Dihydrogen Monoxide  ♫ 03:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 27) &rArr; <font face="Euclid Fraktur"> SWAT  Jester    Son of the Defender  03:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 28) Oppose - Dureo 03:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 29)  M er cury    03:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 30) Oppose - too new; Durova incident; not ready for a leadership role.Frank Pais 03:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 31) I don't anticipate having any qualms supporting next year, but right now I don't feel comfortable doing so. — bbatsell   ¿?   ✍  03:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 32) Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 33) 2 months ago I would have supported. Sorry Ryan. Viridae Talk  04:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 34) ~ Riana ⁂  04:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 35) Everyking 04:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 36) JayHenry 04:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 37) not this time --Duk 04:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 38) Bob Mellish 05:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 39) I dorftrottel I talk I 05:34, December 3, 2007
 * 40) —Mira 05:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 41) I however would like to take a moment to praise this editor's other work on Wikipedia. RyanGerbil10 (Говорить!) 05:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 42) Insufficient experience in important areas of wiki-existence.  Dragons flight 06:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 43) Sjakkalle  (Check!)  07:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 44) Good admin, but not ready yet, Durova RfC was cause for concern.--Bigtimepeace | talk |  contribs 07:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 45) SchmuckyTheCat
 * 46) Inexperienced. —  Nearly Headless Nick   {C}  09:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 47) Needs more experience. Shem(talk) 10:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 48) Doesn't seem able to distinguish the letter from the spirit of 'the rules'. --Mcginnly | Natter 10:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 49) No thanks. Drama and process wonkery.  Neil   ☎  10:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 50) Although a strong admin. Eusebeus 11:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 51) Per Neil. Stifle (talk) 12:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 52) Splash - tk 13:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 53) Oppose Very good fellow, but I question his judgment on many finer points of policy. Xoloz 14:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 54) Addhoc 14:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 55) Oppose (Caniago 15:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC))
 * 56) <b style="color:#6666FF;">Spike Wilbury</b> <b style="color:#000000;">♫</b>  talk  16:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 57) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] KTC 16:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 58) Ral315 — (Voting) 17:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 59) -- Cactus.man   &#9997;  17:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 60) Oppose Edivorce 18:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 61) Oppose <font color="#008080">Avruch Talk 18:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 62) Oppose The badlydrawnjeff proposals were onesided and severe; the Miskin proposals far too mild. Both tended to encourage disruptive bullies. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 63) Spartaz Humbug! 19:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 64) Good chap, but just a little dubious. Moreschi If you've written a quality article... 19:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 65) Oppose Ripberger 20:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 66) Oppose As the above comments show, has some weaknesses.--Bedivere 20:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 67) —Ruud 21:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 68) I'm sorry, but not ready for ArbCom yet. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 23:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 69) EconomistBR 00:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 70) Oppose - <font color="007FFF">Mattisse  01:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 71) Oppose.  Me rk  i  n  s  m  um  01:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 72) Oppose ×Meegs 01:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 73) Oppose - Perhaps next year? --<font color="#3333FF">健次 (derumi)talk 05:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 74) Chaz Beckett 05:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 75) Oppose, sorry. Jonathunder 05:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 76) Weak oppose I like you though. Atropos 05:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 77) John Vandenberg 10:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.