Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/Sam Blacketer

Support

 * 1) This is a Secret account 00:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Kurykh  00:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --Docg 00:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Anthøny  00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Cla68 00:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) --U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 00:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) spryde  | talk  00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Qst 00:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Angus McLellan  (Talk) 00:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) ~ Riana ⁂  00:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 12)  Baka  man  01:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Captain  panda  01:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) maclean 01:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) Fred Bauder 01:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) —  Rlevse  •  Talk  • 01:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 17)  SQL Query me!  01:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) Weak support. --Coredesat 02:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) Again, I regret that I must support this candidate. May God have mercy on your soul, Sam. DS 02:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) Anarchia 02:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) Mike H. Celebrating three years of being hotter than Paris 02:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) Always been impressed with your input. Yes, a bit young in wiki-years, but I've seen enough to overrule that objection.  — bbatsell   ¿?   ✍  02:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 23)  krimpet  ⟲  03:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 03:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 25) Cryptic 03:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) Support -Dureo 03:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 27) futurebird 03:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 28)  M er cury    03:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 29) Videmus Omnia  Talk  03:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 30) Hús  ö nd  03:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 31) Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 32) ~Sasha Callahan (Talk) 04:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 33) Support. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 04:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 34) Strongly. --JayHenry 05:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 35) I dorftrottel I talk I 05:35, December 3, 2007
 * 36) RyanGerbil10 (Говорить!) 05:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 37)  Spebi  06:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 38) Crockspot 08:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 39) No concerns.  Neil   ☎  10:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 40) Has been around long enough to have my trust in him...-- Cometstyles 12:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 41) Don't see why not. Stifle (talk) 12:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 42) Kittybrewster  &#9742;  13:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 43) B 13:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 44) Splash - tk 13:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 45) -- lucasbfr talk 13:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 46) After further reading his answers and browsing his history, I support. Shem(talk) 14:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 47) Chris 16:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 48) GDonato (talk) 16:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 49) Spike Wilbury <b style="color:#000000;">♫</b>  talk  16:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 50) [[Image:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]] KTC 16:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 51) From my interactions?, Of course. &mdash; Rudget contributions 17:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 52) A good choice. Acalamari 18:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 53) Justforasecond 18:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 54) Spartaz Humbug! 19:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 55) Carolmooredc fact he is willing to admit there is a problem with people trolling around pushing a variety of "nationalist" positions good; just hope he's a'gin people doing that!
 * 56) JoshuaZ 19:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 57) – Quadell (talk) (random) 20:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 58) Smokizzy (talk) 20:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 59) -- Cactus.man   &#9997;  20:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 60) Support - sure, sounds good. -- Schneelocke 22:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 61) W.marsh 22:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 62) Support Bramlet Abercrombie 22:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 63) 6SJ7 22:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 64)  Lawrence Cohen  22:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 65) Support. Good answers to the questions.  Eluchil404 00:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 66) EconomistBR 00:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 67) Support <span style="font-family:Verdana, sans-serif">Bastun BaStun not BaTsun 01:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Jd2718 04:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Strike vote to move to oppose. Reasons here and analysis there. (Large number of opposes. The tranche is better off incomplete than with arbitrators without the fullest community confidence). Jd2718 (talk) 18:35, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - Good answers, good statement, seems level-headed. FCYTravis 06:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Everyking 06:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) <font face="Harlow Solid Italic" color="black">DarkFalls  talk 07:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Support -- Cirt 10:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC).
 * 5) 'Support -- Euryalus 10:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Support. Sjakkalle (Check!)  12:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Support Dan100 (Talk) 13:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Support -- Versa geek  15:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Support -- Fram 15:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) -- Y not? 16:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Support - <font color="#003900">Gallo <font color="#007600">glass 18:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Support as a strategic vote, since he's preferable to some of the other candidates. WaltonOne 18:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Support -- SECisek 20:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) <font color="#000088">Ry<font color="#220066">an<font color="#550044"> P<font color="#770022">os<font color="#aa0000">tl et hw ai te  20:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) RMHED 20:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) Support. Opposes precipitate action, and supports discussion. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) Support - Good answers to the questions.  Jaakobou <sup style="color:#1F860E;">Chalk Talk  21:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) Support, sensible and not overly quick to judge. Guy (Help!) 21:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) Merzbow (talk) 23:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) Support--Aldux (talk) 23:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) Michael Snow (talk) 23:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) Support Good answers to questions. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 02:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 23) Support - Peripitus (Talk) 02:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) Support. Viriditas 03:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 25) --<font color="#330000">M <font color="#334400">P <font color="#338800">er <font color="#33cc00">el 04:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) - Jeeny (talk) 03:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 27) Support, Stepp-Wulf (talk) 04:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC).
 * 28) Support FeloniousMonk (talk) 04:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 29) Johnbod (talk) 11:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 30) Support Skinwalker (talk) 18:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 31) Support Modernist (talk) 00:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 32) A basically sensible person who is interested but not obsessed with the noticeboards and arbitration cases. Seems like a good thing to have on board. Thatcher131 02:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 33) Support, good answers, level headed, fair. Dreadstar  †  04:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 34) Support Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 35) Kusma (talk) 08:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 36) Ravenhurst (talk) 13:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 37) Support The cat on your userpage has the right idea though... :) Homestarmy (talk) 18:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 38) Terence (talk) 18:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 39) <font color="#0000DD">&gt;<font color="#0066FF">R<font color="#0099FF">a<font color="#00CCFF">d<font color="#00EEFF">i a n t &lt;  23:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 40) Support --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 04:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 41) Support. Good answers to questions, and the opposition arguments are weak. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 42) Support Wimstead (talk) 08:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 43) Support. Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 08:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 44) Support.--BozMo talk 10:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 45) Support - dave souza, talk 14:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 46) Support. --Fang Aili talk 18:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 47) Support -  Hαvεlok   беседа   мансарда  19:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 48) Dekimasu<small style="color:darkgreen;">よ! 04:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 49) Sandstein (talk) 07:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 50)  <font color="#008000">semper fictilis  14:41, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 51) RxS (talk) 17:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 52) Hiding T 17:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 53) Physchim62 (talk) 23:41, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 54) <font color="007FFF">Mattisse  00:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 55) Wizardman  00:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 56) <font color="#FF0000">N <font color="#0000FF">F <font color="#808000">24 (radio me!) 02:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 57) Support -- EdJohnston (talk) 03:34, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 58) Support. Sam has been a very thoughtful editor and admin, and although he hasn't been an editor long, his judgment has been good and his calm temperament impressive; I have no doubt he will make a great arbitrator. I was tempted to oppose this candidacy because I fear that the workload of arbcom will reduce the quantity of Sam's  excellent article-writing, but I regretfully concluded that I should respect Sam's choice to pursue other priorities.  --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 59) Support --PTR (talk) 14:34, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 60) Support. —— Martinphi   ☎ Ψ Φ —— 06:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 61) Support Taprobanus (talk) 18:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 62) Support - excellent track record, good at consensus building. But please keep contributing to articles! Warofdreams talk 19:30, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 63) Support, why not? Bearian (talk) 19:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 64) Support. Was concerned that this candidacy has attracted a relatively low number of votes, but reading the answers to the questions, I can support per Thatcher. This candidate will provide something different for ArbCom. Carcharoth (talk) 11:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 65) Support --<font face="Futura">A. B. (talk) 13:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 66) Support -- Ynhockey (Talk) 16:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 67) the wub  "?!"  19:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 68) This guy has a very compelling statement, and no significant issues have been raised in the opposition. Grand  master  ka  08:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 69) I'm in. Ling.Nut (talk) 12:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 70) feydey (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 71) Support--Alf <sup style="color:green;">melmac 21:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 72) Support <font color="#ff004f">S<font color="#ff001f">a<font color="#ff1000">u<font color="#ff4000">d<font color="#ff6000">a d e 7  23:12, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 73) I must join other editors in expressing concern that so sensible a fellow has volunteered for the meat-grinder. Best of luck if you make it in. Mackensen (talk) 15:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 74) Support wbfergus undefinedTalk 21:38, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 75) Support. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 06:31, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 76)  Maxim (talk)  00:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 77) Support  Yahel   Guhan  05:45, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 78) Support. Loom91 (talk) 07:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 79) PeaceNT (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 80) Support NoSeptember  20:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 81) ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 22:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 82) Support dv dv   dv d  22:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 83) Support. --Muchness (talk) 00:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 84) Cool Hand Luke 00:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 85) Support, probably consistent, at least in part, with Walton's reasoning. Joe 07:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 86) Support, has many viewpoints which I find disagreeable, but has clearly come to those views through thoughful and intelligent observation about the way things are on the English language wikipedia, and thus I feel bound to respect even those views, while myself tending the other way. We need more thoughtful people than we need people with the right views on the arbitration committee. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 10:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 87) SupportPharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 88) Support <font style="color:#22AA00;">Tewfik <font style="color:#888888;">Talk 18:04, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 89) Sluzzelin talk  20:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 90) Support Consistant worker, keep it up Sam!-BlueAmethyst .:*:. (talk) 23:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 91) Support deeceevoice (talk) 23:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 92) Support Sarah 23:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Rschen7754 (T C) 00:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) <small style="background:#fff;border:#090 1px solid;color:#000;padding:0px 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap">east<big style="color:#090">. 718 at 00:29, December 3, 2007
 * 3) Nufy8 00:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  <font color="#FA8605">ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 00:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]] <font color="Blue">Alex '<font color="Red">fus '<font color="Green">co5  02:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Too new. Zocky | picture popups 02:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) BobTheTomato 03:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) <font color="#CC0018">T <font color="#0000C0">M F Let's Go Mets - Stats 06:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) —  Nearly Headless Nick   {C}  09:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) WAS 4.250 09:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) The candidate has to be around for longer. Although he can perhaps already get a grip on our dynamics, building community trust takes longer. -- ★ čabrilo ★ 10:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) --Mcginnly | Natter 16:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Ral315 — (Voting) 17:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Oppose Edivorce 18:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) Oppose Ripberger 20:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) Crum375 21:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) Weakly oppose.  Don't know well enough to trust, and there are other candidates I'd rather see elected.  GRBerry 21:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 23:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) Too soon I think but maybe next time. WjBscribe 23:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) Addhoc 00:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) Atropos 05:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) This is a case of "not this time" rather than "no", per reasons given by GRBerry, WJB and Dcabrilo. Orderinchaos 01:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 23) Oppose Haber (talk) 01:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) There are other, more qualified candidates this time around. Christopher Parham (talk) 02:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 25) Tim Q. Wells (talk) 04:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) Oppose.Sweetfirsttouch (talk) 18:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 27) Davewild (talk) 19:46, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 28) Wily D  22:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 29) Oppose - The arbcom is evil, so any candidate who chooses to participate in it in any manner shows poor judgment. Gentgeen (talk) 04:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 30) There are more appropriate candidates. John Vandenberg (talk) 04:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose for now. I'm not sure why Sam hasn't answered my question, which was just a request to expand on a part of his statement that wasn't clear to me. Chick Bowen 06:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Struck. Chick Bowen 23:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) I dislike aspects of his statement. Phil Sandifer (talk) 15:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose -- Editor is too accommodating of fringe minorities to be a satisfying arbitrator. He would probably give them too much leeway in allowing them free reign over this opensource encyclopedia. ScienceApologist (talk) 16:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose. Alæxis¿question? 17:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Added many trivial links on Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Summary table. None of the links provides any evidence for Sam's claim of diplomacy skills. Arbitrators should back up their claims. &mdash; Sebastian 07:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Chaz Beckett 10:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose --RelHistBuff (talk) 15:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose KleenupKrew (talk) 13:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose Vote changed per very recent development. SashaNein (talk) 00:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Oppose - Maybe next year? --<font color="#3333FF">健次 (derumi)talk 02:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Oppose, sorry. Maybe next time. Zagalejo^^^ 20:05, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose --Lucretius (talk) 03:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, users need 150 edits to article before 1 Nov to vote in this election. <font face="Verdana">WjBscribe 03:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose. Would not trust his judgement in my limited experience of his doings here. Grace Note (talk) 04:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose Luqman Skye (talk) 06:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose --Pixelface (talk) 09:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose -- R OGER D AVIES  talk 09:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) --Aqwis (talk – contributions) 15:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose, Per Nuffy8--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) (talk) 21:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose needs more time/ experience. JERRY talk contribs 01:13, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose per Zocky.--cj | talk 09:36, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Weakly oppose, for the only reason that other candidates are better poised for this role. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 15:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) opiumjones 23 (talk) 01:16, 16 December 2007 (UTC) cant decide
 * 2) Oppose. Gen. von Klinkerhoffen (talk) 01:24, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose: I have to agree with the "too new" line, here. Geogre (talk) 12:04, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose (weakly), in favor of other candidates. — <font color="#FF9933" face="monotype">xaosflux  <font color="#00FF00">Talk 15:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose. Moved from support. Reasons here and analysis there. (Large number of opposes. The tranche is better off incomplete than with arbitrators without the fullest community confidence). Jd2718 (talk) 18:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose. --JWSchmidt (talk) 20:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose. Jonathunder (talk) 23:57, 16 December 2007 (UTC)