Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Candidate statements/Dream Focus

Dream Focus
I don't believe any one person should be able to decide if an article is deleted, or even a significant portion of itself deleted. Nor should this be decided by just whatever three random strangers are around at the time a third party moderator is called for. If dozens of people have contributed to an article over the years, and none of them had a problem with its size, then why should the opinion of a handful of people who don't care about the subject at all, be able to decide this? Most users will never bother to post their opinions unfortunately, and most people don't return to reread an article they liked, or mark it to watch, to keep track of what's going on. I might not always make the right choices straight away, but I do patiently discuss things, try to figure everything out, and then make a rational decision. I will listen to all sides of any argument, and work to settling things in a fair and logical way. Dream Focus (talk) 21:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * If there is ever a arbitration called for, to settle a dispute between editors, I'll make certain the "its too long, and I prefer short articles" excuse for editing is never considered valid. An article is judged by its context, not its length.
 * The size of an article is never an excuse to erase information from it. If the information is valid to the article, it should remain.  If it can be put on a side page, so be it.  If not, leave it alone.  I doubt most people mind scrolling down to read through a lengthy article, if they are interested in the subject.


 * Questions for the candidate
 * Discuss the candidate
 * Discuss the candidate