Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Candidate statements/Kmweber

Kmweber}}}|

 * My beliefs on the Arbitration Committee are fairly well-known, but if you're out of the loop...I think it's utterly illegitimate. However, I do recognize that my efforts to either formally eliminate it or, (preferably, for a variety of mostly symbolic reasons) simply convince the community to ignore it altogether are not likely to be successful in the short term.  It's a long road ahead, and while I'm traversing it I need to find a way to minimize its negative impact on the community in the meantime.


 * The Arbitration Committee (yes, I have a better name for it, and besides what it engages in is not "arbitration" in any sense anyway, but I digress...) operates primarily by exercising power it does not and has never legitimately possessed. Though, true, the members are elected by the community (ignoring for a minute the fact that one man who is not all that special and also exercises power he does not and has never legitimately possessed holds a veto over anyone he disapproves of), the Committee itself was never created by the community.  It was forced upon the community, and so regardless of how its membership is chosen it remains illegitimate.


 * So why do I want to participate on an illegitimate committee? Frankly, I don't.  As a member, I will vote to decline any and all cases submitted to it, politely suggesting instead that the involved parties go to a legitimate form of dispute resolution, such as RfC, mediation, or any other mechanism that may be created by the community (and therefore has legitimate authority).


 * I'm not an opponent of hierarchy and authority in the abstract. I am an opponent of de facto authority that does not have its source as an express creation of the community.  The Arbitration Committee is the latter, and a vote for me is a vote for restoring power to where it rightfully belongs.


 * Questions for the candidate
 * Discuss the candidate
 * Discuss the candidate