Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Candidate statements/Lifebaka

lifebaka

 * Looking over the other candidates these past two weeks, I haven't seen all that much diversity in them. Pretty much all the strong candidates have lots of involvement at ANI, RFA, other arbitration, etc.  While there's nothing wrong with this, I'd like to supply at least some sort of alternative.  So, here I am, metaphorically standing as a candidate (I do most of my editing seated, to be honest).


 * As far as arbitration itself goes, I'm a complete outsider. I've never participated in any case in any way.  I do, however, learn fast (then again, so do we all; the learning curve for Wikipedia is pretty steep), so I should be fine in the long run.  I assure voters that I wouldn't be running if I didn't feel I am capable of doing a good job on the Committee.


 * Most of the time I've been active on Wikipedia, both before and after becoming an admin earlier this year, has been spent around the various article deletion processes, at first AfD and then the CSD and DRV. I've worked at DRV for nearly a year now, and am active in editing the CSD policy page and the talk pages of all three.  The skill set used in making the decisions for these processes is entirely different from those used at ANI and the like, which I believe would be a useful asset to ArbCom.  I also hope it gives me a slightly different perspective than most of the other candidates.


 * My thoughts on what ArbCom should be doing are pretty much what everyone else says. It should be fast and responsive.  Supposing that I am elected, I will do my best to be both, insofar as I am able.  Beyond that, I'll try to cause as few drahmahz as possible.


 * Well, here goes nothing. I sign here, right?  lifebaka++ 16:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Questions for the candidate
 * Discuss the candidate
 * Discuss the candidate