Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2009/Comments/MBK004

This is a public page for voters who wish to comment briefly on the candidacy of MBK004 or the way they have voted in relation to the candidate. For extended discussion, please use the attached talk page.

Voting in the December 2009 Arbitration Committee elections will be open until 23:59 UTC on 14 December 2009, at which time this page will be archived.

To cast your vote, please go to your personal SecurePoll ballot page. Only votes submitted through the SecurePoll election system will be counted.

Candidate statement • Questions for the candidate • Comment on the candidate • Discuss the candidate

Comments

 * Neutral. Good answers to questions, and appears to be a decent, balanced, intelligent and perceptive person. But there is little evidence of conflict resolution. People who have been doing conflict resolution for some time, and have been doing it well, are most appropriate for this conflict resolution post. SilkTork  *YES! 23:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Staying out of the public eye gives me little to see how you'll respond in certain situations, and how open and fair you will be for that matter. Working with the community and being aware of matters are two very separate things. Ncmvocalist (talk) 16:17, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Support - While I would like to see more work in dispute resolution areas, his platform and question answers are good enough for me to support, see User:Camaron/ACE2009 for details. Camaron · Christopher · talk 21:45, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong oppose because years later, he still maintains in userspace a false statement that I vandalized Wikipedia while my RFA (as User:Shalom was in progress.) Maintaining such material indefinitely on Wikipedia is not appropriate. Ha HA HA YEAH!!! Chutznik (talk) 17:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * See User:MBK004/RfA. Chutznik (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC)