Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2013/Candidates/28bytes/Questions

Candidates are advised to answer each of these questions completely but concisely. Candidates may refuse to answer any questions that they do not wish to, with the understanding, however, that not answering a question may be perceived negatively by the community.

Note that disclosure of your account history, pursuant to the ArbCom selection and appointment policy, must be made in your opening statement, and is not an optional question.

Individual questions
Please ask your individual questions here. While there is no limit on the number of questions that may be asked, please try to keep questions relevant. Try to be as clear and concise as possible, and avoid duplicating questions that have already been asked.

Add your questions below the line using the following markup:

Questions from Rschen7754
I use the answers to these questions to write my election guide. There is a large correlation between the answers to the questions and what the final result is in the guide, but I also consider other factors as well. Also, I may be asking about specific things outside the scope of ArbCom; your answers would be appreciated regardless.

The questions are similar to those I asked in 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012; if you've already answered them, feel free to borrow from those, but make sure the question has not been reworded.



Thank you. Rschen7754 02:12, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Questions from Collect
I also use these questions in my voter guide, and the latter four were actually general questions asked in 2012, which I asked be used again.



Thank you. Collect (talk) 00:38, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Question from Piotrus
(Note borrowed from Rschen7754): The questions are similar to those I asked in 2012. If you've already answered them, feel free to borrow from those, but make sure the question has not been reworded.

Thank you, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Questions by Gerda Arendt
Thank you, precious candidate, for volunteering. Thank you for a thoughtful answer that I support, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Question from User:HectorMoffet
The number of Active Editors on EnWP has been in decline since 2007.

This decline has been documented extensively:
 * In our own "Editor Trends Study"
 * In popular media ("Nobody wants to edit Wikipedia anymore")
 * In scholarly literature ("How Wikipedia’s reaction to popularity is causing its decline")

This raises several questions:



Question from Carrite

 * Thank you. Carrite (talk) 03:21, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Carrite (talk) 03:21, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Question from user:Ykantor

 * Will it be possible for you to refer to "Lying" as well? for instance, an editor deletes a supported sentence and say in the edit summary, that ""already written in the article "firmly opposed" or "opposed to any form of" means the same"". But it is not in the article, and the quotes are definitely not the same. (It is just an example, and I have no intention to use your reply anywhere). Ykantor (talk) 14:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Will it be possible for you to refer to "Lying" as well? for instance, an editor deletes a supported sentence and say in the edit summary, that ""already written in the article "firmly opposed" or "opposed to any form of" means the same"". But it is not in the article, and the quotes are definitely not the same. (It is just an example, and I have no intention to use your reply anywhere). Ykantor (talk) 14:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Will it be possible for you to refer to "Lying" as well? for instance, an editor deletes a supported sentence and say in the edit summary, that ""already written in the article "firmly opposed" or "opposed to any form of" means the same"". But it is not in the article, and the quotes are definitely not the same. (It is just an example, and I have no intention to use your reply anywhere). Ykantor (talk) 14:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Will it be possible for you to refer to "Lying" as well? for instance, an editor deletes a supported sentence and say in the edit summary, that ""already written in the article "firmly opposed" or "opposed to any form of" means the same"". But it is not in the article, and the quotes are definitely not the same. (It is just an example, and I have no intention to use your reply anywhere). Ykantor (talk) 14:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Will it be possible for you to refer to "Lying" as well? for instance, an editor deletes a supported sentence and say in the edit summary, that ""already written in the article "firmly opposed" or "opposed to any form of" means the same"". But it is not in the article, and the quotes are definitely not the same. (It is just an example, and I have no intention to use your reply anywhere). Ykantor (talk) 14:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Will it be possible for you to refer to "Lying" as well? for instance, an editor deletes a supported sentence and say in the edit summary, that ""already written in the article "firmly opposed" or "opposed to any form of" means the same"". But it is not in the article, and the quotes are definitely not the same. (It is just an example, and I have no intention to use your reply anywhere). Ykantor (talk) 14:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Questions from user:Martinevans123

 * Dear 28bytes, your sensible answers fill me with hope and encouragement. Thank you very much. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Dear 28bytes, your sensible answers fill me with hope and encouragement. Thank you very much. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)