Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2014/Candidates/Geni/Questions

Individual questions
Add your questions below the line using the following markup:

Questions from Rschen7754
I use the answers to these questions to write my election guide. As a break from past years, I am not assigning "points" for the answers, but the answers to the questions, along with other material that I find in my research, will be what my guide is based on. Also, I may be asking about specific things outside the scope of ArbCom; your answers would be appreciated regardless.



Thank you. Rschen7754 22:30, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Questions from EllenCT


Thank you for your kind consideration of these questions. EllenCT (talk) 06:09, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Questions from Collect


Thank you Collect (talk) 12:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Questions from Gamaliel
Thanks in advance for your answers. Gamaliel ( talk ) 18:40, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Questions from Everyking

 * How do you feel about the ArbCom's practice of deciding cases through private deliberation? Would you push for greater transparency, up to the point of holding all discussions on-wiki, so long as sensitive personal information is not revealed? Would you be prepared to make a personal pledge to make all of your own comments in public, unless sensitive personal information is involved? Everyking (talk) 01:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I tend towards the position that the primary priority should be getting the correct result quickly. If that means things are largely hashed out in private so be it.©Geni (talk) 15:56, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I think the nature of the communication&mdash;public or private&mdash;influences the correctness of the result. I believe that transparency typically yields better and more responsible outcomes. If that is true, shouldn't the nature of the communication be a priority? Everyking (talk) 01:17, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Questions from Rich Farmbrough


All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 02:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC).