Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2014/Candidates/Salvio giuliano/Questions

Individual questions
Add your questions below the line using the following markup:

Questions from Rich Farmbrough


All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 02:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC).

Questions from Rschen7754
I use the answers to these questions to write my election guide. As a break from past years, I am not assigning "points" for the answers, but the answers to the questions, along with other material that I find in my research, will be what my guide is based on. Also, I may be asking about specific things outside the scope of ArbCom; your answers would be appreciated regardless.



Thank you. Rschen7754 22:30, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Questions from EllenCT


Thank you for your kind consideration of these questions. EllenCT (talk) 16:59, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Questions from Gamaliel
Thanks in advance for your answers. Gamaliel ( talk ) 18:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Questions from Collect

 * 1)  Thank you. Collect (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  Thank you. Collect (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  Thank you. Collect (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  Thank you. Collect (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  Thank you. Collect (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  Thank you. Collect (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1)  Thank you. Collect (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Questions from Fæ

 * (Indentation seems impossible with the ACE template, so just indenting in the normal way)
 * Thanks for your reply, which at least does not attempt to dismiss the finding of fact that I was harassed.
 * You seem unwilling to supply any specific evidence for your general claim that "some editors have been known to try and dismiss legitimate criticism by labelling it homophobic harassment...", which many may read as a issue for anyone who feels that being openly LGBT is the reason behind harassment targeting them on the English Wikipedia. A basic rule of thumb for Arbcom cases is that extraordinary claims require substantial evidence, it is a shame not to see that in play during the election.
 * Unfortunately the impression you have given is this you are more interested in using tactics to dismiss my reputation (after 2012 I don't think I was left with any reputation on this project, so it seems pointless) rather than addressing the question posed, which might have actually helped to gain you votes if answered well. So let's just leave it, I have experienced this sort of political run-around on LGBT matters so many times, I can see this is fruitless.
 * I look forward to seeing the election results, let's hope the outcome is the best it can be to achieve a more welcoming and diverse project with Arbcom leading the way. --Fæ (talk) 12:42, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * You seem unwilling to supply any specific evidence for your general claim that "some editors have been known to try and dismiss legitimate criticism by labelling it homophobic harassment...", which many may read as a issue for anyone who feels that being openly LGBT is the reason behind harassment targeting them on the English Wikipedia. A basic rule of thumb for Arbcom cases is that extraordinary claims require substantial evidence, it is a shame not to see that in play during the election.
 * Unfortunately the impression you have given is this you are more interested in using tactics to dismiss my reputation (after 2012 I don't think I was left with any reputation on this project, so it seems pointless) rather than addressing the question posed, which might have actually helped to gain you votes if answered well. So let's just leave it, I have experienced this sort of political run-around on LGBT matters so many times, I can see this is fruitless.
 * I look forward to seeing the election results, let's hope the outcome is the best it can be to achieve a more welcoming and diverse project with Arbcom leading the way. --Fæ (talk) 12:42, 4 December 2014 (UTC)