Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates/Beeblebrox/Questions

Individual questions
Add your questions below the line using the following markup:

Question from Gerda

 * Thank you, satisfied. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you, satisfied. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Question from Peacemaker67

 * I would say that the banning was a walk-up start and should have been handled at ANI, but the rest has had little effect on either side of what was basically a content dispute. It was a huge time sink and the benefits were minimal because it was almost entirely about content, not conduct, and ArbCom isn't here to look at content. It has also been weaponised against good-faith editors, with a recent attempt to re-litigate it. I hope ArbCom will steer clear of these sorts of cases in the future, unless behavioural problems have proved intractable and unable to be dealt with at ANI. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:40, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * As I said I'm not actually familiar with the details of this case and basically just skimmed one page of it to address the specific point you raised in your initial question. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:58, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * It has come to my attention that your reply was not in fact a response to my answer to your question, but rather the same reply you left on 20 different candidate question pages. This feels less like you wanted to ask a legitimate question and more like you wanted to spam your pet grievance all over the election. I have to say I fins this extremely distasteful and I find myself regretting I replied to you at all since by doing so I unwittingly enabled this behavior. It's just tacky to do something like that. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I asked the same question of every nominee, and my intention with my follow-up comment was to draw to the attention of all nominees my concerns about the acceptance of the case and of its outcomes. I was inviting you to review the case and give your view on whether accepting it was the right decision, an entirely legitimate question to ask a potential Arb. It was not intended as some sort of "gotcha" or attention-seeking action. My concerns about the decisions taken by ArbCom in this case are legitimate and based on evidence. Your views on these matters will sway some editors' votes. Surely raising this issue is acceptable conduct in a ArbCom election, when candidates' views on the role and actions of ArbCom are being scrutinised? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * You're dodging the issue I raised. The way you responded, I can't even say with confidence that you read the replies since you spammed the exact same message to 20 of them in rapid succession. You asked what looked like a genuine question, but when you got genuine, reasoned answers they all got the exact same response. Let's reverse it and say there was a candidate here who, in response to every single question, made it about their own pet issue, as if they hadn't even read the question. . How would that look? Pretty bad. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * You're dodging the issue I raised. The way you responded, I can't even say with confidence that you read the replies since you spammed the exact same message to 20 of them in rapid succession. You asked what looked like a genuine question, but when you got genuine, reasoned answers they all got the exact same response. Let's reverse it and say there was a candidate here who, in response to every single question, made it about their own pet issue, as if they hadn't even read the question. . How would that look? Pretty bad. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Question from Carrite

 * Thank you. Carrite (talk) 17:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Carrite (talk) 17:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Question from WereSpielChequers

 * Thanks, I'm happy with that answer.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  22:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'm happy with that answer.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  22:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Question from Rschen7754
a

Question from Banedon






Question from WBG


Thanks, in advance, for your answers. &#x222F; WBG converse 09:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)