Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates/KrakatoaKatie/Questions

Individual questions
Add your questions below the line using the following markup:

Question from Peacemaker67

 * I would say that the banning was a walk-up start and should have been handled at ANI, but the rest has had little effect on either side of what was basically a content dispute. It was a huge time sink and the benefits were minimal because it was almost entirely about content, not conduct, and ArbCom isn't here to look at content. It has also been weaponised against good-faith editors, with a recent attempt to re-litigate it. I hope ArbCom will steer clear of these sorts of cases in the future, unless behavioural problems have proved intractable and unable to be dealt with at ANI. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I would say that the banning was a walk-up start and should have been handled at ANI, but the rest has had little effect on either side of what was basically a content dispute. It was a huge time sink and the benefits were minimal because it was almost entirely about content, not conduct, and ArbCom isn't here to look at content. It has also been weaponised against good-faith editors, with a recent attempt to re-litigate it. I hope ArbCom will steer clear of these sorts of cases in the future, unless behavioural problems have proved intractable and unable to be dealt with at ANI. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Question from Leaky caldron




Questions from Carrite

 * Thank you. Carrite (talk) 03:56, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Carrite (talk) 03:56, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Carrite (talk) 03:56, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Question from Vanamonde

 * With the caveat that I fully accept that Icewhiz was being a jerk and needed a TBAN: I'm referring to FOF 3.2.4, and specifically to the "inappropriate ethnically derogatory comments" piece of the finding. That sort of comment is a routine part of sourcing discussions in politically fraught areas of history. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah, I think I see. If it becomes a problem, please bring it to ARCA so we can address it. I was looking at it from the standpoint of his behavior only. Katietalk 18:14, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I hope to goodness it doesn't become necessary, but if it does, I will be sure to. I think it can be difficult, with an editor who engages in superficially civil battleground behavior, to pull out specific examples of problem edits; nonetheless, in this case y'all could have done a better job of that. Thanks for the response. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I hope to goodness it doesn't become necessary, but if it does, I will be sure to. I think it can be difficult, with an editor who engages in superficially civil battleground behavior, to pull out specific examples of problem edits; nonetheless, in this case y'all could have done a better job of that. Thanks for the response. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Question from WBG
Thanks, in advance, for your answer. &#x222F; WBG converse 09:53, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Questions from FeralOink
Thank you! --FeralOink Thank you! I am satisfied with your answers, and appreciate the details.--FeralOink (talk) 10:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)