Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates/Donald Albury/Questions

Individual questions
Add your questions below the line using the following markup:

Per WP:ACERFC2020, there is a limit of two questions per editor for each candidate. You may also ask a reasonable number of follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked.

Questions from Mikehawk10


Thank you for your time. I look forward to your responses. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 23:39, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Questions from Kudpung

 * Thank you for your answers, . Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your answers, . Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your answers, . Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Questions from Horizon of Happy
In your long history as an Administrator, what is your single best example (or top three if you prefer) of you attempting to resolve the sort of dispute that reaches ArbCom? What is your general perception of the nature of disputes that are accepted by ArbCom? Horizon of Happy (talk) 11:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Questions from A7V2


Thankyou for your answers! A7V2 (talk) 01:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Question from Epiphyllumlover

 * Oh, wow. I did not know about the complications to the image competition. Thank you for sharing it with me. On the other hand, Reward board has been less of a problem, although that could be due to low activity more than anything else.--16:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, wow. I did not know about the complications to the image competition. Thank you for sharing it with me. On the other hand, Reward board has been less of a problem, although that could be due to low activity more than anything else.--16:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Question from Hijiri88


It wasn't really a "second question", but I think you misread me; the hounded user (me) was placed under a topic ban, but since no evidence of disruption on the part of the hounding party was presented other demonstrating the fact of the hounding, they were not placed under a similar topic ban until the community stepped in about six months later. Honestly, I did not really know how arbitration worked (a fact several users, not just the one who was sanctioned, seemed to want to take advantage of): I assumed that the committee would disregard as tainted evidence presented by someone who was clearly hounding one of the parties to the dispute, and so did not seek to demonstrate any further disruption on their part beyond hounding, until after the proposed decision had been posted and it was too late. So they were left, temporarily, free to undo my earlier edits to that topic area (to which they had originally followed me), with me unable to report them publicly. At this point, six years on, the only effectiveness the IBAN has now, as far as I can see, is that every few months/weeks (or every few days, if I'm especially active -- the last time it happened was three days ago) someone says out of the blue "Hijiri88 has an IBAN" as a chilling effect to force me out of a discussion. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 01:24, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above appears to have crossed a line. I apologize for that. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 01:00, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Question from Atsme



 * Thank you for volunteering, and for your response to my question.