Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates/Opabinia regalis/Questions

Individual questions
Add your questions below the line using the following markup:

Per WP:ACERFC2020, there is a limit of two questions per editor for each candidate. You may also ask a reasonable number of follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked.

Questions from Mikehawk10


Thank you for your time. I look forward to your responses. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Questions from Kudpung
Thank you for your answers,. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Betteridge's law of headlines is a good analogy. I have just one follow up question based on my 2 Qs and your excellent answer to 's Q1. This is absolutely not a request to reexamine any former Arbcom cases, or even to ask you how you would have voted on them -  I never ask candidates how they would have voted on other cases:


 * Thank you again for your answer . Ironically, as far as I can make out, the general consensus among past and present Arbs is that they do not consider examination to be part of their role, even if some comments are ostensibly mendacious or purely vindictive. So thank you again. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you again for your answer . Ironically, as far as I can make out, the general consensus among past and present Arbs is that they do not consider examination to be part of their role, even if some comments are ostensibly mendacious or purely vindictive. So thank you again. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Questions from A7V2


Thanks for your answers. For Q2 I was deliberately vague about "types of editors" though the examples you give are the kind of "types" I had in mind. A7V2 (talk) 01:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Questions from Kolya Butternut



 * Hi Opabinia regalis, I think there maybe some misunderstanding here. My question was meant to ask whether it is helpful to investigate behavioral evidence about old socks which may be potentially connected to an active master. My question isn't meant to be limited to the example case, but any active masters with old sock evidence. (I was actually told that if I think there are accounts with similarities to Daner's creek that I can post them at SPI.) Thank you. Kolya Butternut (talk) 23:10, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Question from Littleolive oil
Removed please see talk page.

Question from Atsme

 * Thank you for throwing your hat in the ring and for your responses to my questions.
 * Thank you for throwing your hat in the ring and for your responses to my questions.
 * Thank you for throwing your hat in the ring and for your responses to my questions.