Wikipedia:Archived articles for deletion discussions/2004 June 13

This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of many pages.

This page is kept as an historic record.

The results of these debates were to delete the relevant articles.

Please do not edit this page.

James Hoare
His band was deleted for being unknowns, and the only other thing he seems to be known for is a few bit parts in TV movies. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 01:45, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. blankfaze | ?�? 04:33, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a vanity press. - Aaron Hill 12:13, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * We just have to get this guy together with the idiot who keeps posting the TV and movie substubs I've been screaming about! Delete. - Lucky 6.9 06:02, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete unless significantly more notable than is obvious. Rossumcapek 18:33, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Patimokkha
This should really be at Wikisource Theon 04:35, Jun 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Wikisource and delete. Johnleemk | Talk 07:43, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Moved to wikisource Theon 14:26, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)

List of internet emoticons and List of internet emotions

 * Isn't this the sort of stuff that can be found on hundreds of websites? Do we need it here?  RickK 06:05, Jun 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, if there is anything there which can be added to Emoticon (which is a reasonably nice article on the topic), then someone may wish to do so. &mdash;Stormie 06:10, Jun 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. We don't need a list on this, there no standard definition of what emotions some of them stand for or how they are supposed to be represented (ie :) or :-)).  The emoticon article (and wikipedia as a whole) is fine without this content. --Starx 00:08, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Emoticon is fine. Actually I find most such lists irritating because only a relative handful are actually used with any frequency; the rest appear only on lists of emoticons, need to be explained whenever used, and are used only in order to have the pleasure of explaining them. :P  :\  Dpbsmith 01:19, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Isn't that what encyclopedia entries are for? Voyager640 04:41, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * People not only say things should be deleted because they CAN'T be found on hundreds of websites, but also because they CAN? Seems kind of absurd. Keep. --Tothebarricades.tk 02:26, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are a few interesting ones in the Emoticons article. This further list of 15 is just a waste of space. It doesn't link back to the main article, it isn't comprehensive and it is already all over the internet. Michael L. Kaufman 05:09, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)

Monic Tribes
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debates and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issues or the deletions should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.